The Great Recession Case Study

1354 Words3 Pages

In the hyper competitive world of today’s mega corporations controlled by the sway of the stock market, giant old industrial era companies rule over the automobile market in the United States as well as large parts of the global automobile market. Companies such as General Motors, Chrysler, and Ford were at the center of it until the economic crisis now known as the Great Recession of the late 2000s. The whole market was declining in sales with General Motors and Chrysler taking the biggest hits while Ford only suffered decline at a comparable to foreign auto-makers, Honda and Toyota, due to restructuring in prior years. However, the tipping point was edging closer to bankruptcy with General Motors and Chrysler that ultimately resulted …show more content…

Basically, the government forced Chrysler to merge with Italy’s Fiat SpA as well as used this opportunity to enforce stricter policies towards “greener” automobile technology. However, even though they did all this to stop the auto makers from cutbacks, closures, and layoffs, the companies ultimately had to do so due to restructuring and the poor economic state of the market at the time. By doing so, is the United States government acting within the public’s best interest by using tax payers’ money to buy out each company to correct their faults or is it allowing companies that have grown “too big to fail” a pass on unethical business practices? To greater explore this situation, I will be using the Christian faith’s, specifically the Benedictine community’s, core values in deciding if the bail out the automobile industry was the best ethical …show more content…

They actually lost about $9.2 billion dollars after the sale of all the stock. (Auto Industry Bailout) This is definitely not acting for the common good, they abuse their power to control what is done with our money when we could be helping each other or it could be going to better causes if it were still in our hands. The Saint Vincent Monastery actually had a similar case where in order for individual monks to get personal items such as clothes, soap, or other items, they would have to talk to one of the abbots. Ultimately, this led to favoritism, minor benefit to the individual, and led many people away from the life. However, today each monk is given a budget for the year that they are responsible for instead of having how their money is spent chosen for them against their will. I am not saying that individuals should not pay taxes, instead I believe that they should have a greater say in what is done with their money. For instance, if there was a system such as the presidential election/congress system where there is a popular vote had weight but there was also a weight for a select group to limit the maximum funds. Note this system is technically in place with congress, but when you have a system that chooses when it gets a raise, what its benefits are, and where money goes that can ultimately lead to benefitting their careers or

Open Document