Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Science and faith differences and similarities
Essay on science and religion as belief systems
Essay on science and religion as belief systems
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Science and faith differences and similarities
The Great Debate
Creation by God? The Big Bang? Books, manuscripts, scientific papers, scriptural works, documentaries, ancient artifacts, and countless web sites all deliver differing theories, most with finales of doom. One could logically suppose that a big boom did occur when this mysterious form of existence sprang into being.
Attempting to argue the theories surrounding the birth of the universe, one by the hand of a Supreme Being and the other by an instantaneous explosion of energy, is a useless debate and huge waste of time. Proponents on each side will fervently defend their respective position. Then there are those pesky, relentless Libras adamantly looking for balance who linger somewhere in the middle. They propose that the two theories may not be completely divergent. The time has come to waste some time.
Note: Science does not claim to be a religion and faith-based beliefs are not dependant on physical evidence. Discussing the two processes as equal alternatives will only initiate a needless, heated, and bitter rivalry.
The Hand of Creation
Believing in Creation by God is having faith that the unseen created matter, energy, space, time, and all living things. God is the eternal, self-existent, omnipotent force who designs, creates, and exceeds physical reality.
Overwhelming evidence exists that the majority of known civilizations inhabiting this planet over millennia believed in a God, or Gods, or oodles of Gods who created and ruled the universe. Ancient manuscripts, drawings on cave walls and rocks, and traditional, oral histories illustrate the enormous faith man has always possessed in the existence of powerful, divine beings. Many of those civilizations developed a decent understanding of the cosmos. ...
... middle of paper ...
...t the universe was discovered. The leftover energy from a colossal explosion had created a CMB, or cosmic microwave background. The Big Bang had occurred.
For many years after Hubble’s discovery, members of the scientific community generally agreed with the Singularity Theory proposed by Dr. Stephen Hawking and Sir Roger Penrose. They suggested that in the beginning of the universe, about 13.7 billion years ago, space and time did not exist. A dense, compressed nucleus, called a singularity, was hanging out alone in a sea of nothingness. The singularity was not inside of space and time; space and time were inside of the singularity. The instantaneous explosion of this hot, dense nucleus, aka the Big Bang, was an energy blast like no other. Space, time, the laws of physics, the foundation for all matter, and the forces of nature were all defined in that one moment.
First, I will demonstrate Stephen Jay Gould’s argument against the overlapping between science and religion, which is as follows:
...nning millennia. At some point, a single force may have been responsible for the chain reaction that resulted in the existence of eroded rock. However, this still fails to point towards a god or conscious creator.
Throughout history there has always been discussions and theories as to how the universe came to be. Where did it come from? How did it happen? Was it through God that the universe was made? These philosophies have been discussed and rejected and new theories have been created. I will discuss three theories from our studies, Kalam’s Cosmological Argument, Aquinas’s Design Argument, and Paley’s Design Argument. In this article, I will discuss the arguments and what these arguments state as their belief. A common belief from these three theories is that the universe is not infinite, meaning that the universe was created and has a beginning date. Each believe that there was a God, deity, or master creator that created the universe for a reason. They also believe that
For over a hundred years now a battle has been raging over the origin of the Universe and man. Soldiers of Science have drawn the battle lines with each side using various scientific and non - scientific theories as their weapons.
The Big Bang is a theory that the universe was created in a very large
the first instances of the Big Bang. What this means is that during the Big
Religion and science are complementary elements to our society. The notion that religion and science should not be merged together, does not mean neglecting to understand the parallel relation between these two concepts and will result in a better understanding of our surroundings. This will put an end to our scientific research and advancement because we will be relying on answers provided by religious books to answer our questions. If we don’t argue whether these answers are right or wrong, we would never have studied space stars or the universe or even our environment and earthly animals. These studies have always provided us with breakthroughs, inventions and discoveries that made our lives better.
The first three chapters of A Brief History of Time cover a variety of topics. In chapter one, Stephen Hawking tries to provide a single theory to describe the entire universe. Chapter two describes some of the ideas that scientists, mathematicians, philosophers, and physicians of the past had about gravity and theories of motion. The third chapter in the book talks about the work of many scientists of the past concerning whether the universe is expanding or not. In each chapter, Stephen Hawking describes several different things to solve the huge idea of the entire universe.
While some people may believe that science and religion differ drastically, science and religion both require reason and faith respectively. Religion uses reason as a way of learning and growing in one’s faith. Science, on the other hand, uses reason to provide facts and explain different hypotheses. Both, though, use reason for evidence as a way of gaining more knowledge about the subject. Although science tends to favor more “natural” views of the world, religion and science fundamentally need reason and faith to obtain more knowledge about their various subjects. In looking at science and religion, the similarities and differences in faith and reason can be seen.
When God created the world “by faith is we understand that the world were framed by the word of God, so that the things which we see how did not come into being out of things which had previously appeared” (Athanasius...
Understanding science and religion historically most individuals would assume that the two differ more than they relate. For decades, there has been the overwhelming debate about the differences between science and religion, and the issues that have set them apart from each other. However, personally, when it comes to the views, and goals of the two they share very similar ideologies and attributes.
Genesis 1:1-2 says: “First this: God created the Heavens and Earth—all you see, all you don’t see. Earth was a soup of nothingness, a bottomless emptiness, an inky blackness. God’s Spirit brooded like a bird over the watery abyss.” The Message. There is a long-standing debate over whether the universe sprang into existence as "singularity", or God created it. Singularities are, in the simplest of terms, black holes.
The big bang theory is an attempt to explain how the world began. The big bang theory begins with what is called a “singularity.” This term is used to describe an area in space which defies all the known laws of physics. Singularities are thought to exist at the core of black holes. Black holes are areas of intense gravitational pressure. The pressure is thought to be so intense that matter is pressed together into an infinite amount of pressure. The dense hot mass of the singularity slowly expanded. This process is called inflation. As the singularity expanded the universe went from dense and hot to cool and expansive. Inflation is still continuing on today which means that the universe is continually expanding.
First off, it is important to realize that religion and science have to be related in some way, even if it is not the way I mentioned before. If religion and science were completely incompatible, as many people argue, then all combinations between them would be logically excluded. That would mean that no one would be able to take a religious approach to a scientific experiment or vice versa. Not only does that occur, but it occurs rather commonly. Scientists often describe their experiments and writings in religious terms, just as religious believers support combinations of belief and doubt that are “far more reminiscent of what we would generally call a scientific approach to hypotheses and uncertainty.” That just proves that even though they are not the same, religion and science have to be related somehow.
There is evidence in the human body and in nature that proves God created the world.