Grand juries do not need a unanimous decision from all members to indict, but it does need a supermajority of 2/3 or 3/4 agreement for an indictment (depending on the jurisdiction). Even though a grand jury may not choose to indict, a prosecutor may still bring the defendant to trial if she thinks she has a strong enough case. However, the grand jury proceedings are often a valuable test run for prosecutors in making the decision to bring the case.
If the grand jury chooses to indict, the trial will most likely begin faster. Without a grand jury indictment, the prosecutor has to demonstrate to the trial judge that she has enough evidence to continue with the case. However, with a grand jury indictment, the prosecutor can skip that step and proceed directly to trial. If you have more questions about how a grand jury works, or need help with a criminal case, consider speaking with a criminal defense lawyer in your area. In general, a criminal defense strategy for your criminal prosecution will emerge as your criminal defense attorney finds out more about what the prosecutor is planning to do. Because each criminal prosecution is different from every other, a particular criminal defense strategy is unique to the situation at hand. For example, if a prosecutor in one case lays out a story that has the defendant at the scene of the crime, the defense attorney will probably ask questions that may lay out a different story showing the defendant at another location. In addition, how the criminal defendant acts and answers questions that the prosecutor poses will also change the criminal defense strategy. However, this is not to say that a criminal defendant and his or her attorney ...
... middle of paper ...
...offenses." Status offenses are distinguished from delinquent acts by the fact that they are only law violations on the basis of the offender 's "status" as a minor. Some examples of status offenses are:
(1)Underage alcohol consumption.
(2)Truancy from school.
(4)Violation of curfew.
(5)Running away from home.
The court handles status offenses differently than it handles delinquency acts (which would be considered "criminal" if the perpetrator was adult). Usually the court sees "status offense" behavior as a warning sign that a youth is in need of assistance. The cases are often handled by social service organizations and child welfare agencies. Status offenders normally will not be held in secure residential facilities, as the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act has called for a "deinstitutionalization" of status offenders.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- 1. The text lists three inherent contradictions in the job of the prosecutor: (a) Prosecutors have nearly limitless discretion in the most critical matters they must consider, yet they are held to very high ethical standards. One contradiction in the job of the prosecutor is that they have nearly limitless direction in critical matters; however, prosecutors’ are also held to a very high ethical standard. Prosecutors must screen cases to determine which ones need to be prosecuted; nevertheless, this is the source of controversy with most people.... [tags: Criminal law, Crime, Criminal justice, Jury]
986 words (2.8 pages)
- The police in disadvantaged neighborhoods may rely on shortcuts that undermine their legitimacy and can have adverse consequences on the people living in the neighborhoods. This research is consistent with previous research on how structural factors of a community may affect crime (Bursik and Grasmick 1993). Residents who view police as illegitimate have been shown to engage in more violence since the police would not be responsive to their requests (Kubrin and Weitzer, 2003). This has also been shown to decrease members of the marginalized groups cooperation with law enforcement and resolve conflicts within their own groups.... [tags: Crime, Police, Jury, Victim]
1103 words (3.2 pages)
- In chapter twelve, Joel Samaha has discussed various court proceedings before trial. Samaha begins to elaborate the importance of the prosecutor’s decision in determining whether there is a concrete case against the alleged defendant. The evidence at hand ultimately dictates the proceeding of events in court. Along with evidence, the lack of resources might add to the difficulty in charging an individual. Prosecutors are faced with an overload of cases; ultimately prosecutors are forced to prioritize their cases based on their resources and the evidence provided.... [tags: Jury, Court, Crime, Common law]
1586 words (4.5 pages)
- The criminal justice system is composed of agencies and processes established by governments to control crime and impose penalties on those who violate laws. The way criminal justice systems work depends on the jurisdiction that is in charge. Different jurisdictions have different ways of managing criminal justice processes. The components of the criminal justice system are law enforcement, prosecution, defense attorneys, courts, and corrections. Law enforcement has many roles in the criminal justice process.... [tags: Police, Criminal justice, Jury, Crime]
1079 words (3.1 pages)
- The federal and state judicial systems are alike in their framework. “One of the most immediate consequences of the dual court system is the complexity it adds to the criminal justice system” (Neubaeur & Fradella, 2014). When placed side by side, both the federal and state courts have circuit courts, courts of appeals or court of last resort and a supreme court. “The creation and maintenance of a highly decentralized system of federal and state courts exists by design, not accident” (Krotoszyniski, 2014).... [tags: Law, Judge, Criminal justice, Jury]
981 words (2.8 pages)
- “We understand Mr. Rabbit. Please take your time.” the deer prosecutor said. “Yes, well... what did Timothy Barren do to me. WELL, I 'll tell you what Timothy Barren did to me. Timothy Barren set up a snare trap right the path I used every day when I foraged for food. He covered it with leaves and handfuls of grass so I wouldn 't see it. And, when I was on my way to collect a few pieces of fresh lettuce for dinner from Timothy’s neighbor 's garden, I found my let caught up in it.” “What did you do then?” asked the deer.... [tags: Jury, Judge, Prosecutor, Court]
955 words (2.7 pages)
- The presence of a jury in our legal system today is to create a sense of democracy in our society, as the presence of a jury avoids the possibility of corruption, similar to the idea of separate power, it is to assure that no one has enough power to abuse it. The right to a jury will ensure that those who are accused will get as close to a fair sentence as possible. The assigned book stated “the jury’s primary purpose is to protect citizens against arbitrary governmental actions by providing the accused a safeguard against the corrupt or overzealous prosecutor and against the compliant, biased or eccentric judge.” Jury nullification is defined by the assigned textbook as “ the right of juri... [tags: Jury, Voir dire, Not proven, Verdict]
1189 words (3.4 pages)
- The right to trial by jury in the modern times originates from twelfth century England during the reign of King Henry II. This system may originate from an “ancient right for an accused to be tried only “by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land”” (Thomas). In the United States, trial by jury is mentioned in Article Three of the Constitution and the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments. For many people, the jury system seems to be the fairest system and most unbiased way of determining a person’s innocence or guilt.... [tags: Trial by Jury ]
1395 words (4 pages)
- The Role of the Prosecutor All serious criminal cases require the participation of three individuals: the judge, counsel for the prosecution, and counsel for the accused. If any one of these are absent from the procedure, "the criminal justice system is incomplete" (Congress). The prosecutor stands at a critical stage in the criminal justice system as well as playing a critical role before, during and after the trial. They serve many functions throughout the criminal process. Some of which are investigating, plead bargains, questioning both jurors and witnesses, and being involved through the sentencing as well.... [tags: Law Legal]
895 words (2.6 pages)
- Police Discretion Discretion, uncertainly, and inefficiently are rampant and essential in criminal justice. Nobody expects perfection. That would neither be good nor fair. Justice is a sporting event in which playing fair is more important than winning. Law enactment, enforcement, and administration all involve trading off the possibility of perfect outcomes for security against the worst outcomes. Policing is the most visible part of this: employees on the bottom have more discretion than employees on the top.... [tags: Law Enforcement Discretion Psychology Essays]
1423 words (4.1 pages)