Boethius’s argument is entirely contingent upon his definition of eternity. Boethius says that God has the ability of foreknowledge and knows all things past, present, and future because of his eternity. Eternity is defined by Boethius as being outside of temporality, to be inside of the temporal realm you have a beginning and an end whereas God does not. Instead of residing in the present that is known by humans God resides in an eternal present wherein God sees all things. Through this definition we see that God knows all things for the fact that he exists outside of time, his argument thus follows. Once we recognize that God is eternal and resides in this realm of an eternal present the idea that God has foreknowledge is no longer applicable. God therefore does have knowledge of the future but not through foreknowledge but through as Boethius states “a moment that never passes.” Through this eternality and living in a momen...
... middle of paper ...
...at God does not have sight of all things past, present, and future would dilute his perfection. Largely what Boethius has done for my beliefs in accordance with the ideal that God sees all things is to now reject the idea that Mormonism holds. Mormonism believes that God does not see all things; I would argue that by this deficiency he is not eternal. In the sense that he cannot see all things he therefore is temporal therefore he had a beginning and will thus have an end and therefore is not eternal. Eternality is a key attribute of God otherwise he would not be God therefore Boethius’s definition of eternality is substantial and accurate further his classification of free will is substantiated through this definition. God is thus blatantly eternal in the sense that he has been and always will be he is also eternal in the definition that Boethius supplied.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Boethius' Consolation of Philosophy In the Consolation of Philosophy, Boethius addresses many solutions to the never-ending problem of evil. In Book IV Boethius offers a solution to the problem based on the distinction between “Fate” and “Providence.” Boethius defines both of these terms and explains his own version of the problem and how to solve the problem using the differences between “Fate” and “Providence.” However one may argue against Boethius’s solution and offer a solution themselves.... [tags: Papers]
697 words (2 pages)
- In the Consolation of Philosophy, Boethius confronts his unjust imprisonment with reason to illustrate how virtue always overcomes evil and how God as the supreme good can neither cause nor condone wickedness. Boethius places an increased emphasis on God’s eternal goodness to prove He can neither causes nor condone wickedness, intending to provide comfort for the virtuous affected by injustice. Boethius’s belief concerning the interaction of evil and justice in the Consolation of Philosophy intends to comfort the virtuous from the seemingly wicked world.... [tags: Consolation of Philosophy]
1459 words (4.2 pages)
- When somebody asks me if I believe in God, I always have responded with a firm confirmation. Without hesitation, I am confident in my Catholic upbringing and belief in God. However, I have never truly been asked, “Why?” by anybody expecting an in depth answer. I have gone my whole life in ignorant confidence of my belief but never truly considered the reason or nature behind my faith. This semester, we have analyzed different thinkers, philosophers, and theologians as they discussed their ideas.... [tags: God, Omnipotence, Religion, Augustine of Hippo]
1122 words (3.2 pages)
- Now and Then: A Discourse on Issues of God and Time The classical understanding of God's relationship with time, eternity, and his knowledge of the future, as exemplified by Classical thinkers such as Boethius, Aquinas, and others, creates problems in regards to creaturely freedom. The question is typically phrased, "Since God is never wrong, if God knows at one moment that one of his creatures will perform some act at a moment which will occur after the moment he knew of the act, then will his creature perform this act?" I maintain that God does not know the future, because, first, God's knowledge of the future destroys creaturely freedom, second, God is always ever Creating, and, finally,... [tags: Essays Papers]
1824 words (5.2 pages)
- Explain the reasoning of the Ontological argument as a proof for the existence of God. Ontological arguments, by their nature attempt to prove the existence of God using deductive reasoning to a point of logical necessity. Constructed as an a priori proof Anselm’s ontological argument works from a position of faith in an attempt to strengthen his belief in the existence of God. Anselm asks the question, ‘can what I know about God, be thought of as correct?’ However, the argument does, in some forms, attempt to prove the existence of God reductio ad absurdum.... [tags: Ontology, Ontological argument, Logic, God]
1025 words (2.9 pages)
- In the Proslogion, Anselm tries to prove the existence of God and his powers through the ontological argument. This argument redirects the argument of God’s existence from science and observation to logic, where Anselm explains that there has to be a being that nothing greater can be thought of, and that is God. One of Anselm’s main topics of contention is God’s omnipotence and whether He is actually infinite. In the Proslogion, Anselm talks about God’s omnipotence and if it can be disavowed because of self-contradictory statements, how God’s non-action gives him more possibility and power, and how being all-powerful can lead to God being both merciful and yet not feel the pains of sinners.... [tags: God, Omnipotence, Ontological argument]
1231 words (3.5 pages)
- One of the most intriguing and admittedly baffling arguments for the existence of God is the ontological argument. It was developed by St Anselm in the 11th century, and the reason said argument is considered unique is because it is an a priori argument rather than an a posteriori argument , which most other arguments for the existence of God tend to take form. It attempts to prove the existence of God, not through any physical evidence, but rather by claiming that the very definition of God is proof enough of his existence; that he is an underlying truth in much the same way mathematical truths are inherently known.... [tags: Ontology, Ontological argument, Existence, God]
1063 words (3 pages)
- Dear Jenny, I apologize to hear about the loss of your mother. I understand that you would like to discuss how the issues that you have relates to gods existence. The specific question is whether this problem of evil contradicts the traditional idea of God. The key points in the two arguments that are being held in regards to whether or not the problem of evil contradicts the traditional idea of God is that Augustine argues the reason why God is an all knowing foreseeing God and how actions are done out of choice.... [tags: Free will, God, Predestination, Choice]
1739 words (5 pages)
- Plato was born in Athens, Greece around 427 B.C. He was always interested in politics, until he witnessed his mentor and teacher, Socrates, death. After learning of the callousness of politics, Plato changed his mind and eventually opened up The Academy, which is considered if not the first, one of the first Universities. Students at the Academy studied many different fields of science, including biological and astronomical. The students also studied many other fields, such as math. Plato developed many views that were mathematical in nature.... [tags: World Literature]
1039 words (3 pages)
- “Evil is Nothing” Her argument of Evil is Nothing is very simple. She begins by speaking with Boethius and getting at the definition of what is good and how that is related to God. She starts out by stating that they agree on the fact of God. Then they come to the agreement that God is the good itself. They then state that there is nothing that can go against God and still have power because God is all-powerful and all good. Lady Philosophy then says, “No one could doubt that God is omnipotent,” and Boethius responds by saying no one in their right mind could deny it.... [tags: essays research papers]
546 words (1.6 pages)