Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of globalization on social
10 impacts of globalization on development
Impact of globalization on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of globalization on social
The world 's socio-economic is affected by globalisation for more than two eras. Ghaus-Pash (2004) quoted that new chances for economic growth have been furnished through globalisation process (e.g. direct foreign investment, exchange of technology and free trade) to some countries like America and United Kingdom. Meantime, globalisation in other countries such as Latin America and Africa connote rising economic deprivation and inequality as a result of their incapability to cope with new and rapid developments (Ghaus-Pash, 2004). In response to rising monetary deprivation and inequality, civil society organisations (CSOs) impose vital and crucial progress to assist the public authorities in recent epoch. According to the World Health Organization …show more content…
The 'activitist’ was a term revived in Eastern Europe and Latin America, stressing that civil society was a means to depict efforts in generating independent public spaces in circumstance of authoritarian states. Currently, ‘civil society ' symbolises changes introduced between the society and the state which led to setting up self-organised institutions (Michnik, 1985). Developments of formal international instruments and human rights groups in Western countries are examples illustrated the influences of civil society in setting up independent public spaces. The term ‘neo-liberal’ refers to civil society with domain outside the political parties, targeted to reallocate and to democratise the state 's power. These civil societies proceed to generate public place and the atmosphere for individuals to behave and to communicate freely without constraint of state and capitalism. Besides, some scholars like Salamon and Anheier (1996) and Kaldor (2003) used other terms like ‘third sector’ or ‘non-profit sector’ to describe above-mentioned versions of civil society. In other words, these civil societies are organisations assisting both the state and the market, but not to dominate them (Kaldor, 2003). Voluntary associations, non-profit organizations and charitable entities are some examples of civil society rendering social services besides …show more content…
Therefore, scholars (e.g. Lewis, 2002; Edwards, 2004; Mersha, 2009) proposed two common approaches to define civil society in the contemporary epoch: the ‘associational’ and ‘public sphere’. The ‘associational approach’ denotes that civil society mainly comprised ‘non-market’ organisations lying between the state and household, namely social movements, membership organisations and trade unions. On the other hand, the 'public sphere’ or ‘deliberative’ approach ' illustrates civil society as a domain with public controversy on formation and determination of society (DFID, 2004). Edwards (2009) supposed that both approaches of civil society are a 'good thing ' to public authorities and the society. He perceived that the former is more desirable for a more delegated and inclusive society. Meanwhile, the latter form of society deems to defend and to broaden public controversy as well as to improve participation of the excluded groups (e.g. rural women and poor people) (Edwards, 2009). The operational definitions and notions of civil society range from official and formal associations to informal and small social groups, yet commonalities are observed in their
ABSTRACT: Totalitarian political systems in the socialist countries of Eastern Europe destroyed and repressed the civil society that used to exist in them. The authoritarian and totalitarian ethos was formed under a powerful influence of ideologies of the communist parties and politocracy in these countries so that the political ethos of politicians dominated the political ethos of the citizen. The breakdown of the real socialism and its unsuccessful attempts to complete accelerated liberal modernization of these societies caused turbulence of social values in addition to the general moral chaos. The moral crisis has deepened; anomie increased as well as the society’s inclination to commit crime. This makes difficult the creation of the cultural matrix of the civil society and its moral values. The liberation and development of the political ethos of the civil society as an element of the democratic political culture require structural and mental changes in these societies. They imply abandoning the value matrices of the traditional and political societies based upon collectivism, tribalism, authoritarianism, egalitarianism, ethnocentrism, etatisme and mythologization of the past. They require the use of the citizens’ active potential as well as that of their associations, their readiness for political commitment, self-initiative, respect of the general interest and a courageous defense of freedom and social justice.
In this essay I shall make a critical comparison of different theories and approaches of community organising. By focusing on main aspects of Paulo Freire and Saul Alinsky’s models of community organising I shall discuss how applicable these models are in the UK. By drawing examples from experiences of applying Root Solution Listening Matters (RSLM) and Participatory Action Research (PAR) frameworks in my practice. I shall demonstrate relationships and differences between the two. By addressing key elements of theories of power and conflict I shall highlight the main characteristics of both and use these theories as lenses to view some problems in the communities. By comparing models of community enterprise I shall reflect on future opportunities of a budding community enterprise. Finally by outlining the methods of evaluation I shall reflect on my chosen framework for evaluation of my work.
According to Macfarlane et al. (2008), institutions of high-income countries tend to define global health in terms of their “working relationships with low and middle-income countries.” Furthermore, the authors pointed out that global health problems tend to be framed and addressed through the lens of industrialized countries. They also found that recent definitions of “global health” in the literature are predominantly written by authors from institutions in high-income countries (Beaglehole & Bonita, 2010; Koplan et al., 2009). According to Frenk and Moon (2013), global health should be defined by two key elements: its level of analysis, which involves the entire population of the world, and the relationships of interdependence that bind together the units of social organization that make up the global population (i.e. nation states, private organizations, ethnic groups, and civil society movements). Would you agree with critics of global health who claim that it is a modern incarnation of colonial
The world we live in today is going through enormous changes in economics, technology, culture, politics, etc. The effects of the changes are not so clear, since it is hard to predict how each sector would affect the other and how society will be affected. However, analyzing past and present occurrences provides some information for experts to interpret society’s reaction in the future to different transformations. Globalization can be seen as a process in which societies around the world come together and expand through the combination of different forces. This paper will explore the effects of globalization on US companies, US society and economy, and the implications for other countries in the post-industrial world.
This theory explains the relationship between "Institutions" and "Individual actions" are aground in "practical reasoning" to which the individual connect with, and adjust the accessible institutional sources to devise a game-plan. Sociological institutionalists contend that associations regularly grasp another institutional practice, not on the grounds that it advances the methods closes effectiveness of the association but since it moves forward the "social legitimacy" of the association or its members. At the end of the day, association's affiliations get a handle on specific institutional structures or practices in light of the fact that a definitive is generally esteemed inside a more extensive social environment. Institutions have authority and power which influences the individual's activity. Eventually, this is an issue about the wellsprings of social power. A divide of the sociological institutionalists highlights the route in which a cutting edge condition of opening up administrative degree setting numerous practices on societal associations by "public fiat".
(Turner and Killian 1987) cited in (Diani 1992, p. 4) define social movements as a “collectivity acting with some continuity to promote or resist a change in the society or organisation of which it is part. As a collectivity a movement is a group with indefinite and shifting membership and with leadership whose position is determined more by informal response of adherents than by formal procedures for legitimizing authority”. Turner and Killian regard a social movement as a peculiar kind of collective behavior that is contrasted to regularity and institutional behavior. Additionally, Turner believes that social movements do not necessarily coincide with movement organisations, although these organisations can carry out a large part of the movement tasks and it is often help to control and speak for movements (Diani 1992).
Many historians and sociologists have identified a transformation in the economic processes of the world and society in recent times. There has been an extensive increase in developments in technology and the economy as a whole in the twentieth century. Globalization has been recognized as a new age in which the world has developed into what Giddens identifies to be a “single social system” (Anthony Giddens: 1993 ‘Sociology’ pg 528), due to the rise of interdependence of various countries on one another, therefore affecting practically everyone within society.
Activities and philosophies that advocate for the connecting of communities with socially sentient beliefs and actions is what have come to be referred to as civic engagement. They are thus individual or collective actions aimed at addressing issues that are deemed to be of public concern. They can be manifested in many ways including; public service, civil activity, service-learning, crusading and advocacy to mention but a few as the list is endless.
In academic discourse concept reemerged in the 1980s in France and then spread in most European countries, Latin and North America, and Asia. In the beginning of 21st century the social economy is considered as a possibility for a “third way” of development after the collapse of state-controlled economies and the criticism of liberal economies.
This chapter began by introducing the concept of a civil society. Chirico (128) described it as people organising outside of government channels to meet social objectives. She pointed out that social movements in the past have focused on communities within nations while the current movements focus more on involving people from diverse parts of the world in order to promote human welfare regardless of where in the World they happen to be. Chirico shared a quote from Simmel (128) that really resonated with me and, in my opinion, captured such a complex concept into a short and simple sentence. He said that “Humanity is the collective life, the same people who from other perspective are organized into societies, polities economies, families, and so on”. I take this to mean that we are all, basically, the same; we are all humans who are trying to make it through whatever life we have been given to live. People are just people. I think the concept of civil society is one that I wish more people would understand and embrace instead of holding on to prejudice, judgement, and ignorance. According to Chirico (128), individuals who help do so out of a sense of shared experience by recognising that everyone is a victim of global problems and that anyone can help. There are endless ways to participate whether it be through a formal organisation such as NGO’s, The Red Cross, Doctors Without Borders, and The Peace Corps, through non-profit organisations and advocacy, or more individually by making donations, sponsoring a child, mentoring, volunteering in their communities. These are regular people who volunteer, and sometimes risk their lives, to fight for equal rights and treatment for all.
Pressure groups are known to be small and extremely diverse formed on the basis of interest and activities, their functions give them a high public profile where minds are influenced and driven to make change. “A Pressure group is an organisation which seeks to influence the details of a comparatively small range of public policies and which is not a function of a recognised political party” (Baggott, 1995: p.2). An aim of pressure groups is to generate support which can influence political agendas; this can directly persuade the government to consider taking action. In this essay I will concentrate upon exploring on various issues on pressure groups, discussing the relationship between the groups, their use of the media and their status as “insiders” and “outsiders” in the political process. Pressure groups have two main types of groups the insiders and outsiders, which each promote a common cause with a different relationship with the media and political party making one as an unheard voice in the public sphere. To the public Pressure groups is another form where the public can engage in politics, participating directly in the political process. I will also intricate in this essay the growths of pressure groups due to the use of the media and their political engagement. The size of a group is a basic indicator of how much public support they get especially those that posse’s open membership, they mobilise through demonstrations, protest involving some non members through organised events. The different types of well known pressure grou...
There are several sources of literature that illuminate community development work from different attitudes, “The politics of community development” being one that will be critiqued in this assignment. Throughout their narrative, Powell and Geoghegan give a commentated survey of community activists. This book examines the construction of organisations,
The term globalization is one that is an exceptionally wide-ranging term and it is used to explain a wide variety of definitions. Many people link the term globalization with the how the world is connected on an international and a local scale. One example of this is how Inda and Rosaldo illustrate globalization as being in “a world full of movement and mixture, contact and linkages, and persistent cultural interaction and exchange” (Inda and Rosaldo 4). On the other hand, they also imply that although movement and connections are prime components of globalization, disconnection and exclusion also form globalization (Inda and Rosaldo 30). Global flows of economic and social structures are not fluid and constant; they have the power to exclude and immobilize as well as enhance movement and include certain beings. In the 60s, the term `global village' was used by Ma...
Globalization, the acceleration and strengthening of worldwide interactions among people, companies and governments, has taken a huge toll on the world, both culturally and economically. It’s generating a fast-paced, increasingly tied world and also praising individualism. It has been a massive subject of matter amongst scientists, politicians, government bureaucrats and the normal, average human population. Globalization promoted the independence of nations and people, relying on organizations such as the World Bank and also regional organizations such as the BRICs that encourage “a world free of poverty” (World Bank). Despite the fact that critics can argue that globalization is an overall positive trend, globalization has had a rather negative cultural and economic effect such as the gigantic wealth gaps and the widespread of American culture, “Americanization”; globalization had good intentions but bad results.
In today’s globalizing but still fragmented and dangerous world, nations more than ever need effective governments to provide security, social cohesion and order, governance, infrastructure and basic services. They need, too, a vigorous private sector to mobilize the productive forces of the market, thereby creating national wealth and a strong national economy linked to international trade and markets. These two alone are not enough, however. Without the balance and political integration provided by the action of a third sector “civil society” too often the outcome is to centralize even more power in an already highly-centralized public sector and to concentrate even more wealth in an elite segment of the private sector. A dynamic civil society is needed to bring much greater political voice, social engagement, and economic participation to grassroots citizens. The three sectors need to work together in cross-sector partnerships to advance social progress and reverse the growing gap b...