Comparing 1984 And Animal Farm By George Orwell

779 Words2 Pages

More than sixty years after 1984 and Animal Farm were published, they remain as quintessential books for everyone to read. The political commentary of these novels resonates with everyone. Both works of literature warn the public about the dangers of an abusive government. Orwell uses a bleak setting in both novels to appeal to the public’s widespread fear of desolation and isolation. The themes of the books are unanimously acknowledged to be still relevant to modern society. These core elements of 1984 and Animal Farm transcend time and nationality. 1984 and Animal Farm remain as timeless works as literature by using character archetypes, a bleak and desolate setting, and powerful themes to express universally applicable messages. 1984 and Animal Farm remain eternally relevant by employing archetypes to enhance the meaning of both. Orwell uses the ruler archetype for the characters of Napoleon and Big Brother to supplement to the message of the books. The dangers of a totalitarian dictator are reflected in both novels. In Animal Farm, even though Napoleon seemingly promotes equality, he rises to a position of power and abuses it. He breaks all of the Seven Commandments as soon as they are inconvenient and manipulates the working animals. Despite promising Boxer the best medical care, he sends him to the knackers as soon as he outlives his purpose (Animal Farm 122). Napoleon suppresses any form of dissent from …show more content…

The values of these works of literature are still pertinent to today’s society. Orwell utilizes dangerous totalitarian dictators to warn the public about oppressive governments. A stark and isolated setting serves as a backdrop for terrifying experiences. The fundamental elements of 1984 and Animal Farm surpass cultural barriers and profoundly impact all readers. By carrying universal characters, setting, and themes, both novels live on as timeless works of

Open Document