The Pros And Cons Of Beefalo

Imagine playful laughter and trivial quarrels radiating from a family as they enjoy dinner together on a warm summer night. Fully prepared food lies on a red and white-checkered tablecloth, fairy lights line the back porch, and the sun begins to set. Smoke seeps through the area, crafting that familiar summer night smell of a freshly used grill. While most families would grill burgers or chicken, this family grilled beefalo. Beefalo, a hybrid of beef and buffalo, resulted from genetic engineering. Beefalo exists with further hybrid colleagues, such as: the Cama, a cross of a camel and a llama, and a Pizzly, the cross between a Grizzly Bear and a Polar Bear. These absurd crossbreeds did not happen through chance, but rather an engineered experiment

One’s behavior, health, disorder, and characteristics, all depend on he’s genetic code. Genetic engineering, also known has genetic modification, can have various methods, but commonly consists of alternating the DNA in an organism’s genome (Winter). Several instances of alternating the DNA in an organism comprises of changing one base pair of the organism’s DNA, removing a region of the DNA, and gene cloning (Winter). Scientist use genetic engineering to enhance and modify the characteristics of an organism (Knapton). For example, aside from the experimental purposes, the cross between Bison and beef combined each of their best quality to make one enhanced outcome. Due to the cross, the Beefalo has increased efficiency and taste, meaning they can input costs and improve profits. Other examples of genetic engineering include GMO (Genetically Modified Organism) foods, such as fruits and vegetables. Genetic engineering, although used on animals and food for decades, only recently surfaced with concrete evidence towards working on human DNA. This groundbreaking knowledge can provide new medical advances, completely altering the emblematic

Usage of genetic modification to pick and chose features and personality traits of embryos could conceivably occur in future times. Wealthy individuals could essentially purchase a baby with built-in genetic advantages (Simmons). Ethically, these seem immoral. Playing God and taking control over the natural way of life makes some understandably uneasy. Ultimately, religious and moral standpoints should play a role in the future of genetic engineering, but not control it. Genetic engineering’s advantages far outweigh the cost of a genetically formulated baby and