Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The dangers & opportunities of the common core
The dangers & opportunities of the common core
The dangers & opportunities of the common core
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The dangers & opportunities of the common core
Common core has been the program calling all the shots in most school systems in the United States. Since the year 2008, the common core standard testing has been sneaking its way into the school systems. The common core has brought up many different situations within the schools. One situation consists of determining the education level of students by using the same standardized test. Another situation is by requiring teachers to teach to a certain test, even though students do not fully learn what they are being taught. The government should not be able to evaluate students and teachers by one certain test. Attention must be brought up to how common core has changed our education system to the unproductive side, but then explain how our schooling systems can fix the problem that has been made. The common core can be fixed for the best, but the most fulfilling way to fix this problem is to get rid of the program altogether. The best results of students’ education can truly be viewed accurately once the common core is fully out of the school curriculum.
The first problem of the common core started in the beginning. When common core was introduced to schools, some administrators did not have time to think through the pros and cons. This resulted in administrators not considering the best methods and budget distributing for their schools’ benefits. Workers and classrooms were then changed to meet the requirements needed for the common core to take place. Librarians are examples of this because they are losing their jobs due to salary cut backs, having to transfer their jobs to become a teacher to help teach the common core, and some libraries are even being completely shut down for the use of testing areas. The reason for these ev...
... middle of paper ...
...of taking the common core out of the school systems, this can better prepare students for not just college but also in the future as an adult. Common core also makes it unfair for students to succeed in their education because of the different learning levels of students. Once the teachers relate to the students and their needs of education, students then should not have a problem succeeding in education.
Works Cited
Bushaw, William J., and Shane J. Lopez. "Public Education In The United States: A Nation Divided." Phi Delta Kappan 94.1 (2012): 9-25. Academic Search Premier. Web. 17 Apr. 2014.
DelGuidice, Margaux and Rose Luna. "Cut To The Core: Better Luck Next Year." Publishers Weekly 261.2 (2014): 22-23. Academic Search Premier. Web. 17 Apr. 2014.
Traeger, Patricia. "The Negative Effects of Common Core." Examiner.com. N.p., 13 Nov. 2013. Web. 17 Apr. 2014.
Today, public schools follow a set of standards called Common Core. Despite its good intention, Common Core could potentially do more harm than good. Common Core standardized tests for example create stress and pressure for students and teachers. If students fail the tests they might have to retake the grade, and the teachers of those students are held responsible. Common Core is not necessary as other countries, like Finland for example, has successful students without the need for tests like the standardized
Of the teachers I have spoken with most have agreed that the common core has been rushed, with not enough time and/or money to adequately prepare. The goal was a noble one – to have the United States a global leader in education. But the curriculum was basically just dumped in the teacher’s laps. Testing the system in a select few school districts would have been a better way to gradually implement the new curriculum.
The Common Core Standards prepare students for a competitive global economy and has been designed to leave room for tailoring to specific state populations who must adopt at least eighty five percent of the standards, leaving fifteen percent to tweak. The Common Core Standards were designed by a diverse group of teachers, experts, parents, and school administrators to reflect aspirations for student achievement and an understanding of the realities of the classroom.
Common core is not a new method. America has set standards since at least the 1950’s and many schools have since then implemented a curriculum supporting this ideal. These standards in language arts and mathematics are supposed to help the nation prepare students for college and their future careers. The effects of common core, both positive and negative, lead to the debate on whether or not it should still be implemented in schools today, but thanks to federal funding it has made it hard to get rid of the program. It is because of this that the governor of Louisiana, Bobby Jindal has decided to sue the federal government for violating the 10th amendment. Although many can agree that having standardized goals gives both the students and staff
(2014) exclaimed that why do 62 percent of parents think the Common Core is not perfect for their kids, despite it has fascinated some entrepreneurs such as Bill Gates and the secretary of education. In a case in point, parents should get more involved in the education of their children if they do not approve of measures being used. She agrees to the idea of a federal government using incentives to adopt their specific education program, but then again she only sees that parents complaining and not taking action. In another context, “parents have no choice about whether their kids will learn Common Core, no matter what school they put them in, if they want them to go to college, because the SAT and ACT are being redesigned to fit the new national program for education”. (Pullmann, J. 2014, September 24, p. 1). In fact, Porter (1989) states that the Common Core standards became as opposing to teachers and teaching occupation, and the tactics are not good strong enough for enabling teachers to be dependent. The teacher is often understood to be the planned without rules. Moreover, some voices against the criticism of the common core, they believe that it is meaningless because districts are still permitted to select which material goes out with stem the basis stated by the Common Core
In 2009, the Common Core Standards were implemented throughout the United States. Although the Common Core only affects how the Math and Language Arts standards are taught, there still have been many flaws pointed out and heavily criticized by many parents and professionals alike. Mostly criticized is the fact the cursive handwriting is not taught anymore, how different the standards are then what they were like before, no creativity is encouraged,
One of the main issues with Common Core was how it was and still is being taught. The actual intent is now blurry because every teacher teaches differently and has interpreted it in their own way. This applies especially to those teachers who dislike Common Core and find it unnecessary to try and fit their given standards. Common Core itself has created more standardized tests than our education system has ever provided over the course of a school year (“Psych Today”). The problem with standardized tests is that there is no room for complex thought, can’t account for non-verbal learning, and unable to avoid cultural bias. (“Preparing America’s Students for Success”) Along with the increase of standardized tests, the weight of them towards a student’s education has increased as well. This has created an outburst from the students who are currently going through this newly developed curriculum. Students believe that having a standardized test account for how ready they are for college simply isn’t fair. The most common way that teachers seem to prepare their students for these standardized tests is by repetition which is a form of memorization. They have them take multiple practice tests in order to “prepare” them for what to expect during a test. This is ironic because Common Core was designed to abandon the old emphasis on memorization and
The article states Common Core has become scapegoat for many arguments in (or adjacent to) education most of are not related to CCSS. There are viable arguments from both those who oppose Common Core and those who support it. The essential goal to remember is kids need to learn skills for new jobs. Will they be ready, and who is to blame if they are
Valerie Strauss wrote an article titled “Why I once liked Common Core but changed my mind- one principals view” which is the letter from one principal to another discussing why she no longer supports Common Core. Carol Burris is a highly decorated principal from one of New York’s top high schools and she is writing to Jayne Ellsperman a principal in Florida who shares most of the same thoughts. The main issues with Common Core here is work and stress put on students. Burris states that her faculty began pulling her aside and asking questions about there elementary students who were stressing out. “Homework was taking hours to complete- even for first and second grade children.”(Burris) and when Burris pulled up the elementary standards and read the kindergarten level. “ I confess that reading this kindergarten standard made my jaw drop.…” (Burris) Now in what world should a top preforming high school principal be floored by kindergarten standards. Common Core is asking to much from out children and they are pushing them to
Furthermore, the Common Core State Standards provides the opportunity for teachers to increase their proficiency in teaching students to enhance their understanding and articulation of a wide range of topics that would be beneficial towards their post educational life experiences as reflected in the amount of states that have increased their overall educational grade. Due to a current rise in critical thinking skills needed in today’s society, there has been an increase in the necessity for well-developed critical thinking skills amongst adults who wish to be successive and become a productive member of society and it starts with elementary school and continues into college with the Common Core State Standards. By accepting the Common Core State Standards, schools have the chance to gain access grants to be used in incorporating the standards, making updates to the educational infrastructure, and alleviates the costs associated with adopting the Common Core State Standards. If a state has not adopted the Common Core State Standards and the current State Standards do not meet or exceed the Common Core, than it may be in the best interest of the
Common Core is a controversial issue concerning many different kinds of people. Teachers are concerned because they feel like the new standards implemented restrict their abilities to create a lesson that fits their specific student’s needs. Students are concerned because of the increased amount of testing associated with Common Core. Parents are concerned because they have no say in what their children learn. Lastly, the government is concerned because of the state our country is in education wise and how far behind we are falling.
Considering our students, the education system has left myself as well as many other students battling with weaknesses due to the constant worry to compete rather than teach. The requirements and the motives of No Child Left Behind has made a negative impact on myself, due to teachers teaching the test in order to keep their funding. The Common Core and No Child Left Behind are both numbers driven. While teachers focus on keeping their funding, the government is focused on ranking and less about the minds of our future, our students.
College-Ready Education has established shared valued by focus in on challenges in the education fields. I live in the state of Georgia and our education program just introduced the Common Core to our students last year. We have yet received the results and many students such as my own had a difficult time understanding the core. Introducing and learning new skills for both teachers and students can be a difficult time within a school year. Educators working on the Common Core feel this is a great learning experience for students to face the real world when entering college. In the article the main objectives is to support teachers as they go through modernization.
Every student learns differently and needs a different approach. If I am able to implement Common Core Students, and still reach all of my students, I am all for it. I agree that something needs to be done for the students to help them be more successful throughout their school year, and beyond. Students in Alaska sadly have been known to be below other students nationally and Common Core may be just the thing, to give them the needed boost. I have some students who would love to go to a college in the lower 48, but feel they would never be accepted because “Alaska’s kids just are not as smart as them other kids”, as quoted from some of my students. I know it will take time for my students and I to acclimate to the new, but I am going to give Common Core Standards a chance with an
Imagine being in a line with twenty random people. You all have different strengths and weaknesses and you all are expected to know the same things as the person beside you. This is what common core does to students. It turns them into cookie cutter students where everyone knows all the exact same things with nothing more or nothing less. Common core was created to make college and career ready students. They claim to have “real-world learning goals” meaning that the learning goals they have created will help students in real world situations. With common core all there is, is a middle point for students to get to. Students that excel in one subject will never be pushed to learn more and students that struggle in a subject will