There is often a lot of confusion when it comes to the First Amendment and what can or cannot be said. A lot of people think because the First Amendment protects against prosecution from the government for freedom of speech that they, can say or post online whatever they want. Freedom of speech may give people the right to say anything they want, but not always without consequences. The First Amendment does not fully protect people from being prosecuted for using or directing hate speech at a certain group or person, depending if they’re using “fighting words”. The First Amendment is not only there to protect someone’s right to freedom of speech. It also covers the freedom of “not” speaking, religion, art, or photos, (as long as they’re not child pornography), expressing oneself by what they wear. The First Amendment also covers freedom of press as long as it is not false or slander. To be clear, there is nothing in the US Constitution that separates freedom of speech and hate speech. There is no “clause” or article about hate speech. There are a few exceptions, but nothing that stops one person from speaking ill of another person or group.
The First Amendment in the United States of America’s constitution protects the right of freedom of expression and freedom of religion without government interference. The constitution prohibits the government from interfering the press or individuals to speak freely. The constitution states under The First Amendment, ““Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”. The purpose of the First amendment is to protect unpopular forms of speech and to g...
... middle of paper ...
... and that you could be charged with a crime for it. When I started this paper it was going in a completely different direction until I started doing more research and I’m surprised to learn that hate speech is completely legal. I do not think that hate speech should be completely legal, I think that there should be some amendment to the constitution to make certain things illegal. Right now, with our presidential race happening I have seen so much hate speech recently and to me it is sickening. I fear what will happen if Donald Trump because President because of the hate speech he says at his rally’s and what a big public figure he is. The first amendment was made to protect us from being able to say whatever we want, but what is there to protect us from the hate that people say? If we could get rid of hate speech, then we could possibly start getting rid of racism.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In considering freedom of expression and where to limit it, a careful balance needs to be struck. Too forceful limits on expression can lead to autocratic governments that jail dissident citizens and force its citizens to hide away original thoughts. Yet, laws that give a hall pass to all speech that does not present imminent danger merely allows hate groups to flourish and sow their ideals. True democracy ensures each person is allowed an equal say, regardless of any physical, mental, or personal trait.... [tags: Democracy, Freedom of speech, Hate speech]
1053 words (3 pages)
- In the debate, “Freedom of Speech Threatened on Campus”, four panelist argued either in favor or against the motion. In this case the winners of this debate where the pro side due to their good use of supporting arguments. As for the opposing team they lost audience support due to their weak presentation of arguments. This paper will focus on one of the opposing panelist whose arguments were unsupported. Shaun Harper the Director of the center for the study of Race & Equity in Education, of the University of Pennsylvania argued that freedom speech is not threatened in universities by speech codes rather students who are judging does students voicing their opinion are the ones who are threa... [tags: Hate speech, Freedom of speech, Censorship]
1745 words (5 pages)
- On January 17th of 2015 two men with rifles and various firearms went into the offices of the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Paris, bashing and shooting their way through the building they killed a total of 11 people and injured 11 more. after the incident the two men escaped. A vigorous search for the two suspects was issued and they were confronted by military and a shooting between the men and the military occurred, they entered a building belonging to a signage company and took hostages.... [tags: Freedom of speech, Censorship, Hate speech]
1067 words (3 pages)
- Freedom of speech allows us to freely express ideas, to worship in the way we choose, to agree and disagree with each other and to stay informed. As long as we don’t incite violence on others or any of the other things that the First Amendment does not protect us from, we are free to express ourselves as we wish. An individual can support or condemn anything they want; “don’t eat red meat, it’ll kill you”, “the president should be praised”, “the president should be impeached”, “the Chicago Blackhawks are the greatest hockey team ever.” These declarations can be well thought out, researched and fact-checked, or simply phrases repeated because they sounded good to whomever heard them at the ti... [tags: Hate speech, Freedom of speech, Censorship]
852 words (2.4 pages)
- Living in the United States we enjoy many wonderful freedoms and liberties. Even though most of these freedoms seem innate to our lives, most have been earned though sacrifice and hard work. Out of all of our rights, freedom of speech is perhaps our most cherished, and one of the most controversial. Hate speech is one of the prices we all endure to ensure our speech stays free. But with hate speeches becoming increasingly common, many wonder if it is too great of a price to pay, or one that we should have to pay at all.... [tags: Freedom of Speech Essays]
2303 words (6.6 pages)
- In recent years there have been calls from community leaders across Australia to make amendments to Australia’s Racial Vilification Act (1975), with some arguing certain aspects of it should be modified to promote freedom of speech, while others contend the Act does not do enough to protect certain groups from racism. In March 2014, Attorney-General George Brandis announced plans to repeal Section 18C of the Racial Vilification Act (Lillebuen, 2014), which makes it “unlawful to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate another person or a group of people because of race, colour or national or ethnic origin” (Brett, 2011).... [tags: Race, Racism, Freedom of speech, Hate speech]
1601 words (4.6 pages)
- Thanks to Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (CHRA) and passionate advocates of unsanctioned freedom of speech, Internet blogger Marc Lemire now stands at the apex of a remarkably heated controversy in human rights law. Anti-Racist Canada (2012) recalled that five months after the launch of his Freedom-Site on the Internet in January 1996, Lemire used his website to promote his CD-ROM, via a Stormfront mailing list, that was, “filled to the brim with Pro-White files, including sound files, movies, pictures, and text files.” This CD-ROM caught the attention of Richard Warman, a human rights lawyer and former employee of the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC).... [tags: Hate Crimes, Freedom of Speech]
1309 words (3.7 pages)
- George Orwell’s fantasy is not merely a fantasy. His novel depicts the true nature of the communist utopia, a hypocritical fallacy conceived to give power to the few and destitution to the many. In the book 1984, many methods of instituting and maintaining a communist regime are described with the most prevalent and significant among those being the suppression of free thought, the moral denouncement of innate individuality, and the deceit of the populus making them perceive a perfect, utopian fantasy.... [tags: Hate speech, Freedom of speech, Racism]
1812 words (5.2 pages)
- It is a very common point of view that individuals have the right to their opinions. Indeed, a central feature of autonomy is the freedom of thought, and any person or society which values individual autonomy must consequently treat it as a fundamental right. A fundamental right is one that may not be violated, even for the sake of a public good. As it would be wrong to kill ten carriers of a dangerous disease to prevent its spread to a thousand others, it would be wrong to punish people for holding unpopular or even reprehensible beliefs.... [tags: Hate speech, Freedom of speech, Censorship]
1020 words (2.9 pages)
- The controversial proposed amendments to the Racial Discrimination Act (1975) are of political and social importance. It has been asserted the changes could expose people to racial discrimination and hate speech. However it is also suggested that the amendments allow for more freedom of speech. Attorney General George Brandis sparked controversy with the proposed amendments and argument that the current legislation amounts to ‘political censorship’ (Brandis, 2014 in Griffiths, 2014). Brandis asserted that the current act restricted freedom of speech and controversially stated ‘everyone has the right to be bigot’ (Brandis, 2014 in Leslie, 2014).... [tags: Racism, Hate speech, Freedom of speech, Rights]
1110 words (3.2 pages)