Philosophers have pondered over the subject of free will for decades and there still hasn’t been a definite answer to the question of free will. What does free will truly mean? Is it just a figure of our imagination? Or is it something that has been around since the creation of men? These are only a small fraction of questions the topic of free will arises. Free will can be broken down into smaller and fewer overcomplicated categories. A normal person like you has free will if our universe revolves around the fact of determinism, if you believe this theory, then you’d be considered a compatibilist. Compatibilism allows us to hold people responsible for their actions. You believe that the reason why you have free will is because when something that happens to you is determined by the decisions you made before that event.
That’s one of the underlined surface concepts, another one is hard determinism, which believes that if determinism is true then that means you don’t have free will. Contract to hard determinism is soft determinism, which means that both free will and determinism can be true. Let’s take a moment and break this concept down too; if determinism were NOT true then our actions would be random and not due to our own characteristic and desired values and, therefore, is not due to free will. Example, if a person were to rob a New York bank in broad daylight and get caught, were your actions do to determinism or just caused by a random action? A hard determinist would argue that he had no control of his actions because he does not have free will. So does that mean that the bank robber is free to go on all counts because he didn’t have a choice? That would not be an acceptable ans...
... middle of paper ...
... the future are the results of your previous experiences? Yes. Strawson would argue heavy that Robert Harris was not acting on free will and the reasons for his actions are because of how he was raised and he should be punished with a death penalty. I also believe Strawson’s argument because I don’t think it would be morally correct to punish someone that has done something so heartless and put him to death. Robert grew up in a very painful environment and I don’t think killing him would solve anything for anyone. Do I believe he should be punished? Of course, he should be but not with death. A life for a life? Do we live in such a backward society that we think it is acceptable to kill someone because of they were not in the right mental state of mind? I don’t think so. Robert Harris should be punished and treated for his sickness, it’s only the right thing to do.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The aim of this essay is to prove the reliability of and why Libertarianism is the most coherent of the three Free Will and Determinism views. It refers to the idea of human free will being true, that one is not determined, and therefore, they are morally responsible. In response to the quote on the essay, I am disagreeing with Wolf. This essay will be further strengthened with the help of such authors as C.A. Campell, R. Taylor and R.M. Chisholm. They present similar arguments, which essentially demonstrate that one could have done otherwise and one is the sole author of the volition.... [tags: Free Will, Determinism]
1618 words (4.6 pages)
- Humans have always question if we have free will or if we are unconsciously control by someone, and to understand or to answer the question, first we have to understand what is free will. According to the oxford dictionary, free will is the power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one’s own discretion. However, most philosophers have decided that there might not be one single concept for the definition of free will. The question of free will has been around for ages and philosopher have taken sides.... [tags: Free will, Determinism, Causality, Psychology]
1032 words (2.9 pages)
- Many people argue the theories free will and determinism. Though each have problems, I will argue that free will is correct. Free will is the ability to choose between different possible courses of action. We are giving reason and will as humans which basically shapes who we are as people. Will is the ability to choose to act or not to act while reason is the mental capacity that informs the will of the appropriate action. Libertarian and do not believe in Determinism but in free will. This can also bring us to indeterminism which states that all human actions are not so much determined by the preceding events, condition, causes or karma as by deliberate choice of free will.... [tags: Free will, Determinism, Libertarianism, Causality]
1005 words (2.9 pages)
- In Philosophy, one of the most controversial discussions is whether or not humans actually have free will to make the choices and do the actions that they desire to complete. In order to understand the argument, defining key terms like free will, deliberation, and determinism is vital. One Philosopher, Daniel Dennett, explores the topic and issues of free will and determinism in his 1984 book Elbow Room. I disagree with Dennett view and I believe that humans do not have free will. We are controlled by several things, like our evolutionary past and genetics, or environment, and they all play into determinism.... [tags: Free will, Determinism, Daniel Dennett]
1860 words (5.3 pages)
- A man is said to be morally responsible if and only if he acted freely when he performed whatever action it might be. A man is not held morally responsible if he did not act freely and the act was simply caused by prior factors which there is no control over. The freedom of the will argument states these hypotheses. Determinism is the thesis that there are conditions that make future events happen the way they happen. Philosophers then interpret determinism to be compatible or incompatible with free will.... [tags: Free will, Determinism, Causality, Libertarianism]
1114 words (3.2 pages)
- One of the most widely discussed topics in the field of philosophy is the concept of determinism. Determinism is “the thesis that only one continuation of the state of things at a given moment is consistent with the laws of nature” (Inwagen). In other words, people do not act of our own accord but rather by the hand of a greater force in a predetermined series of events. The theory of determinism opposes that of free will, which is the belief that we have the choice to do whatever we want to do.... [tags: Free will, Determinism, Libertarianism, Causality]
971 words (2.8 pages)
- As some believe that we humans have free will, they believe that we have the freedom of choice and the freedom of action. But, if all of our actions have a reason behind them, or if there is a causal explanation behind each of our choices, it is difficult to say that we actually have the freedom of will. For this reason, determinism challenges free will, as the determinist believes that all of our decisions are governed by some form of natural law, and that all of our behaviors are explainable by this law.... [tags: Free will, Causality, Determinism, Metaphysics]
960 words (2.7 pages)
- Humans are not truly free, they have free will but much of their lives are determined by other external causes. To be a soft determinist or a compatibilist, there are certain conditions that must be followed. One is the belief in the free will, another is the belief in determinism- or that actions and thoughts have causes, and the final is that both free will and determinism can go together. This view still allows for people to be morally responsible for their actions while suggesting that it is possible that there where underlying means to the thought of that action.... [tags: Free will, Causality, Determinism]
1317 words (3.8 pages)
- Consequence argument means taking a radical claim between compatibilism and determinism. Compatibilism is the free will to do whatever one wishes to do because it is in their own nature. In the free will debate of “Consequence Argument,” Peter van Inwagen, the author of An Essay on Free Will, takes on a compatibilist view by arguing that determinism is not true because one cannot be held responsible for their own actions. Determinism is the belief that human actions or free will have either a positive or an effect in the future.... [tags: Free will, Determinism, Libertarianism]
1133 words (3.2 pages)
- Determinism and Free will Suppose that every event or action has a sufficient cause, which brings that event about. Today, in our scientific age, this sounds like a reasonable assumption. After all, can you imagine someone seriously claiming that when it rains, or when a plane crashes, or when a business succeeds, there might be no cause for it. Surely, human behavior is caused. It doesn't just happen for no reason at all. The types of human behavior for which people are held morally accountable are usually said to be caused by the people who engaged in that behavior.... [tags: Philosophy Philosophical Essays]
1001 words (2.9 pages)