Fraternal Polyandry in Tibet

1377 Words3 Pages

Although the various phenomena that involve multiple males involved with one female, have always been fascinating to anthropologists, there does not seem to be one common explanation for polyandry. This failure has raised questions about the similarities between the different societies in which this type of behavior is observed in. From the point of view of Berrman (1975), polyandry does not have a same manner in all societies and the basis, function, costs and consequences of polyandry must be studied individually in each society (Goldstein, 1981).

Polyandry is the rarest form of marriage and has been observed in only four societies: the Toda, the Marquesans, the Nayar and the Tibetans (Lee,1982). Even in polyandrous populations, most of the marriages seem to be monogamous. However, cultural definition for an ideal

marriage in these societies is polyandry. It is often presumed that men have more tendency to marry more than one woman and not women to have more than one man at the same time, that is why polyandry termed unnatural (Lee,1982). There are various factors that have an effect on a society to adopt polyandry.

Extreme poverty has been among the main factors that may influence a society to practice polyandry. A polyandrous marital system may serve as coping mechanism to lessen hardships caused by resource scarcity in societies where families cannot support population growth (Lee,1982). This system works by regulating the population size. The justification is that a woman in union with more than one man cannot produce any more children than a woman with one man in a given duration of time and thus very few offspring are produced as a result.

...

... middle of paper ...

...with an individualistic approach. Younger siblings will therefore defect from the polyandrous marriage system in considerable numbers (Levine, 1988). The population will grow as a result since more woman of reproductive age will exposed to risk of conception. This negative feedback pattern

observed in Tibet served as an efficient process to quickly maximize or minimize population growth depending on resource availability.

Works Cited

Goldstein, Melvyn C.

1981 New perspectives on Tibetan fertility and population decline. American Ethnologist 8(4): 721-738, 325-327.

Lee, Gary.

1982 Family structure and interaction: a comparative analysis. 2nd ed. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press

Levine, Nancy E.

1988 The Dynamics of Polyandry: Kinship, Domesticity and Population on the Tibetan Border. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Open Document