Victor Frankenstein Film Analysis

942 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Commentary on frankenstein

The creation of life is said to be something only God has the power to do, but what if man could create life as well. James McAvoy 's character Victor Frankenstein and his assistant, Daniel Radcliffe 's character Igor, discover the way to create life in the movie Victor Frankenstein. The movie Victor Frankenstein was produced by John Davis in 2015. Victor Frankenstein is one of many movie or screen adaptations of the book Frankenstein written by Mary Shelley, in 1818. In recent generations, Frankenstein has been a modern day cult classic with multiple variations of movies, television, and cartoons being produced. When Frankenstein successfully creates an undead monster, he raises questions about creation by God and man made creation. For the …show more content…

Science fiction enthusiasts like the movie because of the different ideas brought forth in the movie. These concepts range from the machine Frankenstein builds, to the idea of building a man made monster, and bringing the monster to life with lightning. Scientists, whose fields of study are anatomy and biology, use movies like this one to gather ideas and inspiration. Whoever read the original story of Frankenstein, he or she would probably watch this movie because it puts a twist on the original without changing too much of the storyline. The audience shapes this movie 's point by what the ratings were, how much money was spent watching the movie in theaters, and people 's personal comments about the movie. Most people who saw the movie gave an average rating of 6 out of 10, and the movie made a little over thirty-four million in the box office (IMDB). The critique of the movie was half and half; half of the people liked this movie, while the other half disagreed with the changes to the original …show more content…

Those who are avid fans of Frankenstein will watch the movie to see what has been changed to the original story; these people are the hardest critics because they are fans. Anyone, who knows the story, will go to the movie for the sake of watching a science fiction movie. Another assumption is that people will already have a mindset of what the movie should be before they see it. If they know something at one part of the movie should happen, but it does not, they will wonder

Show More
Related

  • The Curse Of Frankenstein Comparison Essay

    585 Words  | 2 Pages

    Frankenstein is a horror movie that tells the story of Dr. Henry Frankenstein’s experiment. In search for the fame and glory of playing to be god, he reaches a point where he is able to revive dead people. In this version of Frankenstein’s monster we see a selfish and careless scientist that created a creature with his intelligence. The way the character is shown reflects how ambitious someone can be to reach to be known in the world. This movie makes the people who are watching to feel empathy on the poor creature. This poor creature that did not want to live in a life where everyone is going to hate him for having a horrible aspect and not following rules that he has no idea about.

    Read More

  • Young Frankenstein Film Analysis

    1293 Words  | 3 Pages

    Anyone who has had the chance to read Mary Shelly’s original Frankenstein and watch the movie Young Frankenstein is aware that there is quite a difference when it comes to the two of them. For one it is easy to point out that Young Frankenstein is set out to be a comedy while the original version of Frankenstein is made to be serious. Young Frankenstein is a 1977 film that tells the story of Victor Frankenstein’s grandson. The film adaptation is essentially a parody of the classic tale along with other versions of Frankenstein. It pointed out from the start of the movie that it would run directly parallel with the original tale when Fredrick Frankenstein was mentioned to be the grandson of the infamous Victor

    Read More

  • Who is the Villain in the Frankenstein?

    718 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mary Shelley is the original playwright of 'Frankenstein' and it has been adapted since then by Phillip Pullman. Mary wrote it in 1818 and it was first performed in 1988, at the Polka Children's theatre in Wimbledon. In the play, a doctor called Victor Frankenstein created life from an experiment, a monster, and although Frankenstein had intended the monster (who wasn't to be called 'the monster') to be a kind, caring and loving creature, the way the villagers treated him and turned away in disgust when they saw the monster, was the reason that the monster became evil.

    Read More

  • Comparing Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Kenneth Branagh's Frankenstein

    1196 Words  | 3 Pages

    Most Americans have some idea of who Frankenstein is, as a result of the many Frankenstein movies. Contrary to popular belief Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a scientist, not a monster. The "monster" is not the inarticulate, rage-driven criminal depicted in the 1994 film version of the novel. Shelley’s original Frankenstein was misrepresented by this Kenneth branagh film, most likely to send a different message to the movie audience than Shelley’s novel shows to its readers. The conflicting messages of technologies deserve being dependent on its creator (address by Shelley) and poetic justice, or triumph over evil (showed by the movie) is best represented by the scene immediately preceding Frankenstein’s monster’s death.

    Read More

  • Frankenstein Comparison Essay

    707 Words  | 2 Pages

    These movies show how the original image of Dr. Frankenstein’s creation has changed over time, and how he can be altered into many different forms. Contrary to popular belief, Frankenstein’s creation is not a huge, green, evil monster with neck bolts. The monster is a very enduring character, and his different qualities are shown in Frankenweenie and Edward Scissorhands. Both of the following films dab in the Gothic style, and portray the different qualities from the novel Frankenstein. From dogs to humans with scissor hands, Frankenstein’s monster appears in so many things in pop culture today.

    Read More

  • Viewing Frankenstein’s Monster as a Human

    904 Words  | 2 Pages

    The literary critic Harold Bloom, in his Afterward in the Signet Edition of Frankenstein states that, “The monster is at once more intellectual and more emotional than his creator.” Bloom continues to say that the creature is more human, more lovable, and more to be pitied than Doctor Frankenstein (292). Throughout the novel Frankenstein, the monster portrays more human qualities than his creator Dr. Frankenstein. Dr. Frankenstein appears less human than his creation because he rejects his own creation and he fails to plan for the results of his experiment. As the monster wanders through the novel searching for companionship and acceptance, Dr. Frankenstein refuses to provide the support expected of a parent or creator. While the monster appears human in his attempts to socialize with his peers, Dr. Frankenstein represents the monstrosity that occurs when humans tamper with life.

    Read More

  • Victor Frankenstein: The Real Monster of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    1574 Words  | 4 Pages

    Victor Frankenstein: The Real Monster. & nbsp; Science is a broad field that covers many aspects of everyday life and existence.  Some areas of science include the study of the universe, the environment, dinosaurs, animals, and insects.  Another popular science is the study of people and how they function.  In Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, Dr. Victor Frankenstein is an inspiring scientist who studies the dead.  He wants to be the first person to give life to a dead human being.  He spends all of his Frankenstein is to blame for the tragedy, not the monster he has created, because he is the   mastermind behind the whole operation, and he is supposed to have everything under control, working properly as a good scientist should. & nbsp; Although some critics say that the monster Victor has created is to blame for the destruction and violence that followed the experiment, it is Victor who is the responsible party.  First, Victor, being the scientist, should have known how to do research on the subject a lot more than he had done.  He obviously has not thought of the consequences that may result from it such as the monster going crazy, how the monster reacts to people and things, and especially the time it will take him to turn the monster into the perfect normal human being.&nbsp something that would take a really long time and a lot of patience which Victor lacks.  All Victor really wants is to be the first to bring life to a dead person and therefore be famous.  The greed got to his head and that is all he could think about, while isolating himself from his friends and family.  In the play of  Frankenstein, when Victor comes home and sets up his lab in the house, he is very paranoid about people coming in there and & nbsp; I had worked hard for nearly two years, for the sole purpose of infusing life into an inanimate body.  For this I deprived myself of rest and health.  I had desired it with an ardour that far exceeded moderation; but now that I had finished, the beauty of the dream vanished, and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart. (156)  & nbsp; Victor is saying that he has isolated himself for two years and in the end, he is not at all happy because of the bad outcome.  He also adds, "Winter, spring and summer passed.so deeply was I engrossed in my occupation" (156).  By spending most of his time inside on his experiment, never going out, but mostly worrying about his success,  he has got himself crazier.  This has made him lose sight of his surroundings and judgment & nbsp; Moreover, the monster should not be held responsible for killing Victor's family members and friends as shown in the book and movie, because it is Victor who has brought a dead creature back to life.  He expects the monster to know everything when he wakes up cool, calm, and collected.  But when the monster is awakened, he does not know anything.  He sees a world different from what he is used to, which makes him get nervous and scared, so he&nb has removed him from  dead.  With the dawning of life, the monster has to learn about his new environment.  In the play of Frankenstein, the monster starts to gradually get used to things.  The problems he encounters are with Victor's assistant, Peter Krempe,  Victor's friend, Henry, and other family members, including Elizabeth, and these are reactions to how these people treat him.  These reactions are clearly shown in the movie of Young Frankenstein, where Victor tries to teach the monster how to live like to show off the monster to an audience in a dance routine of sorts.  But then people start to scream,  panic and throw things at the monster, so he reacts by attacking them to defend himself.  In this case, it is clear that Victor tries to push the monster too hard because he wants to be famous.  

    Read More

  • Comparison Between The Film And The Book Frankenstein

    746 Words  | 2 Pages

    Frankenstein is a fictional story written by Mary Shelly. It was later adapted into a movie version directed by James Whales. There are more differences than similarities between the book and the movie. This is because, the movie is mainly based on the 1920’s play, other than the original Mary Shelly’s book Frankenstein. A text has to be altered in one way or the other while making a movie due to a number of obvious factors. A lot of details from the book were missing in the movie, but the changes made by Whales were effective as they made the movie interesting, and successful.

    Read More

  • Frankenstein: Don't Judge a Monster Based on His Appearance

    1505 Words  | 4 Pages

    The book goes into greater detail regarding the monster’s hardships, has a more eloquent and persuasive monster and has a more heartbreaking ending. As a result a reader feels greater sympathy towards the monster in the novel rather than in the play. The monster begins his journey a purely innocent and kind being, but because he has to suffer the misfortune of having such a monstrous appearance he is condemned by society. Frankenstein tells the story of a benevolent being persecuted by man, and has the reader questioning who the real monster is.

    Read More

  • Film Analysis: Young Frankenstein by Mel Brooks

    1078 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mel Brook's film ,Young Frankenstein, is a comedic throwback and famous parody to Univeral's Frankenstein (1931), Bride of Frankenstein (1935), Son of Frankenstein (1939), and The Ghost of Frankenstein (1942). (quote from interview generally describing movie experience).

    Read More

  • Is Frankenstein a reality?

    1948 Words  | 4 Pages

    When Frankenstein, was made into a movie in 1931, a memorable scene from it became the dark and gloomy night Victors creation came to life. The violent thunder and lightning had the audience predicting an intense moment was about to occur. Victor’s dead corpse was raised to an opening at the top of the ceiling where a magnificent display of light is shown jolting the machines connected to his creation. After the corpse was completely descended back into the laboratory, Victor notices a slight movement of the corpse’s stitched on hand. He shouts “Look! It’s moving. It’s alive! It’s alive! Oh in the name of God. Now I know what it feels like to be God.” Soon after,...

    Read More

  • Comparing Frankenstein To James Whale's

    1170 Words  | 3 Pages

    Since the original novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, to the multiple movie adaptations, the monster is almost always predicted as the monster of the story. It may be his physical appearance, from his tall, broad frame, to the signature screws in his neck. It may also be his unnatural upbringing and interpreted evil characteristics. We have grown to fear the monster, which ultimately, has masked the true monster, Dr. Frankenstein. With each coming movie, the good side of the monster is brought to light, while the real monster shows his true colors.

    Read More

  • What Happened To Mary Shelley's Frankenstein?

    322 Words  | 1 Pages

    For not being born like anyone else, for not being created like everyone else, just for being an outcast made out of dead parts of other people. He was seen as an act against God and to the people who are one hundred percent into christianity to where they push their beliefs onto other people, he had to be destroyed. I am not aware to why people are attached to Frankenstein, like really no clue I’m not really into it like that. Though if it’s like how I pick out what books to read it’s because you can feel for the character. You have some sort of relation that you are going through or you see yourself in that place. That’s the only way I can see

    Read More

  • The Fear Of Science

    1571 Words  | 4 Pages

    In a way, the monster is portrayed as science and Frankenstein's fear of and hatred towards the monster or science is expressed throughout Frankenstein. Thus, Frankenstein is a novel which proved to society that science is dangerous. That said, we should not tamper with life using science since it will only lead to disaster. Another novel which expressed society's hatred and fear of science through literature is the Time Machine. The story is about a Time Traveller who believed that there was no difference between Time and any of the three dimensions of space except that the consciousness of a human being moves along Time in a single direction from the beginning to the end of his or her life.

    Read More

  • Frankenstein Romanticism Analysis

    1143 Words  | 3 Pages

    Frankenstein is a novel written by Mary Shelley, telling Victor Frankenstein’s tale as he creates life through science. The first edition of Frankenstein was published during 1818. There is conflict regarding the genre of the novel, as it holds gothic, romantic, and science fiction elements. The story begins with the Robert Walton, a lonely, self educated man, writing to his sister. By Chapter One, the story takes on the point of view of Victor Frankenstein, the son of a wealthy man and woman with two brothers. Victor has a childhood companion named Elizabeth, whom he eventually marries. Victor leaves Geneva to attend the university at Ingolstadt, where he is scolded by a professor on his “wasted” studies of alchemy. Victor begins to study natural sciences, excelling in his

    Read More

More about Victor Frankenstein Film Analysis

Open Document