For a lot of people physical appearance is an intricate part of a person’s sense of identity and a connection to their roots or even their personal religion. Appearance can also play a big role in the workplace. We will take a look into how companies can regulate appearance through dress codes, height/weight restrictions, and hair based on what is deemed “appropriate” and can this be successfully done without discriminating.
Formal regulations on appearance have been put in place by many companies for various reasons. One being, some jobs call employees to have direct interaction with customers and you only have one chance to make a good first impression. Certain physical attributes have been heavily associated with different stereotypes which can be hard for some people or customers to look past and not judge off appearance alone. For example, if you walk into a doctor 's office and the receptionist or nurse has five face piercings and tattoo sleeves that might scare the patient off because those things are not physical attributes we typically associate with medical professionals. If done properly regulations can help a company.
Regulations on appearance have become very popular and can vary from
…show more content…
Uniforms can come with both positive and negative advantages. A positive advantage is additional advertising. Having employees work in a standard given uniform can create extra advertising when they go different places while still in their work clothes. Another benefit is uniforms can create a more professional look. Also depending on the company it can help the customers. For example, Target does a great job at this with their employee uniforms. Employees at Target wear a bright red polo with the store 's logo and a pair of khaki pants. They’re very simple be effective. Having a uniform in place allows for customers to find an associate easily if they assistance or want to get more information about a
Having some sameness can create a safe environment in schools. Having school uniforms can help decrease in-school violence, theft rates and gang colors. School uniforms can also eliminate distraction that clothes can cause. According to a study done at a Long Beach middle school overall school crime decreased by 36% when they enforced a mandatory program. If people did not have to wear school uniforms gang rates may go up, theft rate would be higher and it would help the school see who belongs at school and who doesn’t. You need school uniforms to have a safe environment for people to teach and learn.
Currently television networks and stations require a set appearance and weight standards for news reporters, newscasters, weather forecaster. Our society looks at the news and weather to see not only the news and weather but the persons. They believe that physical attractiveness and pleasing body image have long been known to have marketplace advantages. Therefore many organizations set appearance standards for their employees, because they think that will project a particular image and as well as a favorable working environment. (Harvey & Allard , 2012, p. 231)
In the realm of work the appearance of someone’s body has a significant impact on their success according to Lorber and Yancey. In the text it was emphasized how height is idealized in the work world because it shows authority and being superior to peers and competition. Weight, height, race and jaw shape all are characteristics that have been observed to play a particular role in decision-making for leaders, e.g. the men with looks far from ideal had rarely moved up in military status in comparison to those with more idealized looks (253).
All human beings are conscious of their appearance. Society conditions the individual to meet distinct appearance criteria and sets forth an image that is deemed “attractive”. This struggle to fit norms, known as lookism, is discriminatory in its nature. Defined in 2000 by the oxford dictionary as “’prejudice or discrimination on the grounds of appearance’”, this new “ism” has risen to the surface in recent years (Ambrosetti 52), showing the prominence of its affects. Human beings construct circumstances that rule their realities. Gender, ethnicity and culture are all cultural constructions that have no true meaning once removed from society. That being said, lookism is biases of identification that influence one’s
You are less likely to be picked on or “judged” by other people if you are wearing uniforms. Because when those uniforms come on you are looked upon as equal. On the other hand when you wear your own clothes there is always the kid the does not have the “cool” clothes, or their clothes are not good enough, don’t match, doesn't follow the dress code. But suddenly that all goes away with a uniform.
The perception of the "ideal beauty" is an arbitrary and abstract concept that is constantly being modified as a result of the times. People are influenced by the images they see in the media to determine what the ideal beauty is. The media is manipulative and deceptive in nature, and it continues to carry harmful suggestions about ideal beauty despite the concrete evidence of damaging effects to people of all ages. Fortunately, it seems there may be shifts in the media that are beginning to portray men and women more realistically.
In many companies, especially fashion industries, promotion for merchandise is mainly targeted to attract a youthful and attractive youth. One of the most noticible tactics of this example is advertising, usually showcasing a beautiful and lean supermodel. However, businesses are now hiring good-looking employees, in an attempt to lure in more customers. Recruiting people as "walking billboards" is controversial, considering the chances of being employed would be biasied, due to how a worker may look. Steven Greenhouse, the author of "Going for the Look, but Risking Discrimination" provides the reality of how looking a certain way for a job, is associated to prejudisim. In contrast, Mr. Cohen's analysis depicts that "being able to find a brand enhancer, or... a walking billboard, is critical." However, I disagree with Cohen, because there is more to a product than just an attractive representative.
Rhode reasons that we should abolish the practice of allowing individuals or institutions to discriminate others purely based on their physical appearance. She contends “the financial, physical and psychological price of appearance demands closer attention and collective action.” Her objectives are that if we can promote more “attainable, healthy and inclusive ideals of attractiveness”, the denial of gender inequality in the workplace will reduce significantly. She further emphasizes that the society is in need of moving away from our excessive celebration of physical appearance to focus more on creating a supportive environment that address the importance of mental and physical well-beings. Yet, these critics and proposals seemed a little overly ideal and
Everyone in today’s society has pressure put on themselves because of the way they look. No matter if you are the most gorgeous/handsome person on this planet, that specific person has their own faults with their image. Financial success now a days puts pressure on others image. For instance, for women to work at “Twin Peaks,” “Hooters,” “Bone Daddy’s,” “Bombshells,” or any of the other sports bars, you either have to have one of the following, “Boobs, butt, pretty face, or a flat stomach.” If you are hired with one or the other, let’s face it… you will get talked about and or made fun of. As for men, it is pretty much the same. Just as the new “Tallywackers” that opened up in Dallas. People (women mostly) that go into the restaurant, get to choose their server before they sit down. To others that is completely unfair, because their body image depends on their pay that night. With how bad people are getting teased/bullied, changing to the opposite sex, getting plastic surgery and etc. no one seems to have tried to do anything about any of it. It is probably because we have all kinds of different ways with technology to make someone feel beautiful and good about themselves, that it does not need to be fixed. Though in some cases, others do not have money to do what
As the practice is becoming increasingly popular, mainstream acceptance has given birth to a society that values appearance over ability and ultimately leading on to discrimination in practically every field. There is an overwhelming amount of evidence that indicates that appearance has become a vital contributor of success at the workplace and even in educational institutions for that matter. A study by researchers from Rice University and the University of Houston indicated that candidates with facial scars and blemishes faced lower odds of being remembered by their interviewers which lowered their ratings and evaluations (as cited in ...
Uniforms and dress codes effect many parts of society. They are used in schools, teams, and many workplaces. However, they are a widely debated subject. There are many benefits to uniforms. They can reduce bullying, encourage unity, and give a school, team, or workplace a more professional look.
School uniforms should definitely be used in school systems. Uniforms are both good for schools as well as for the students. Wearing uniforms will help build a sense of unity within the school. Instead of everyone as a separate team, everyone will be in the same team. Wearing uniforms will help free students of the stress of what to wear in the morning. Wearing school uniforms will help improve student individuality and improve their self-esteem.
Appearance matters because some facial qualities are useful in guiding adaptive behavior that even a trace of those qualities can create an impression. Specifically, the qualities revealed by facial cues that characterize emotion and identity, which are overgeneralized to people whose facial appearance resembles the unfit. Although people tend to admonish the statement ‘don’t judge a book by its cover’, they also repeatedly defy that warning in their day to day routines, responding to people on the basis of their physical
School Uniforms are a logical choice for the public school venue. Uniforms prevent students from a lower income background to be singled out for poorly made or cheap clothing, prevents use of gang colors, allows for certain safety measures, and allows teachers to form impressions of students based on actions and work rather than dress code choices.
Uniforms provide students with school uniqueness. Students will stand out in field trips and other school activities feeling a sense of belonging. A bond will then form and unite more students together.