Movie Review: Food Inc.

1128 Words3 Pages

Food Inc. directed by Robert Kenner gives viewers an eye opening experience to the politics of the industrial food manufacturing and processing system. Kenner is an award winning documentary director and producer since the 1970’s. He has perfected his craft in Food Inc. by allowing the viewer to better understand where processed food comes from and the corporations that own it all. The film takes a look into three of the most popular goods of corn, beef and pork. There becomes a better understanding of the corn industry and how almost all processed food can be traced back to the genetic modification of corn. Beef can be tied into this scenario with the newer practice of feeding cattle corn. The film takes some interest in explaining how corn …show more content…

The film highlights the potential thoughts of previous food company CEO’s now being the political figures that decide their laws and regulations. There is no one governing their decisions that continue to allow the companies to function in unethical standards. The film also highlights the topics of patenting of seeds and how the financial benefits for the companies has destroyed America’s corn farmers. Our nation has become so dependent on cheap and fast food that we have allowed the government to turn a blind eye to the mistreatment of workers in the industry to keep our dollar menus. The film urges us to make smarter decisions about our food consumption which in turn will help bring down the cost of the smart foods we should be …show more content…

To be specific, the film goes into some detail about the chicken farming industry. They give the opinions of two different chicken farmers. The viewer first gets the opinion of “Vince”. Vince has multiple chicken farming houses and does not see anything wrong with the company’s practices. He highlights how much money the industry has brought to his town and how much it has helped people survive. To counteract his opinion, the film shows chicken famer “Carole”. She gives the point of view of how degrading the industry is to its producers and how they have financially crippled the chicken farmers. Both points of view can be seen as valid facts from both sides of the

Open Document