In her poem ‘The Flesh and the Spirit’, Bradstreet uses the form of the poem to create unique personalities in her characters, using them to argue in favor of following God. First, Flesh uses insulting phrases while Spirit uses reason in her words. Next, the syntax of the poem, while Spirit is speaking, shows an intelligent argument instead of the pushy manner that Flesh is conversing in. The imagery and comparisons that Spirit use tells the audience of the treasures that await them when they follow God and shows the difference between the motives of the two sisters. Finally, Bradstreet uses the poem itself to compare it to the audience and herself. Flesh and Spirit are the Yin and Yang of this poem. Where Flesh is using harsh words to push …show more content…
Flesh uses parataxis while she is speaking. Some examples of this are “Dost honor like?”; “For riches must thou long full score?”; “Behold enough of precious store.”; and “Affect’s thou pleasure?” (Bradstreet, 234). Bradstreet consistently falls back on parataxis to show the audience that this is Flesh’s argument, using it to show how unreasonable Flesh was being in trying to get Spirit to abandon God’s teachings. Spirit uses hypotaxis as her main form of communication. The primary example of this was in her argument against Flesh. “Thy sinful pleasures I do hate / Thy riches are to me no bait / Thine honors do, nor will I love / For my ambition lies above.” (Bradstreet, 235). In this passage, Spirit says that the pleasures of Flesh’s sins are of no temptation to her and that she will find greater pleasures once she achieves her goal of following God. The way that Bradstreet writes Spirit makes her sound dignified and wise. All throughout her argument, Spirit uses phrases similar to these that have double meanings. Overall, Bradstreet uses Spirit’s elegant speech to convince the audience that following God is their best …show more content…
Flesh argues that “Earth hath more silver, pearls, and gold / Than eyes can see or hands can hold.” (Bradstreet, 234). This use of imagery is to try to tempt Spirit with worldly goods, but Spirit rebutted the argument by stating what riches she will receive when she reaches God. “My crown not diamonds, pearls, and gold, but such as angels’ heads enfold.” (Bradstreet, 235). Already the audience hears tales of these wonderful riches, more precious than anything in this world, only matching in value to what is bestowed to the angels. Bradstreet does this once again while describing the gates of heaven. “The gates of pearl, both rich and clear / And angels are for porters there / The streets thereof transparent gold.” (Bradstreet, 235). These two passages were written not only as a persuasion for Flesh to follow God but for the audience to follow him as well. Spirit intentionally uses an exaggerated (or maybe not, no one can really know) description of Heaven in order to stem a desire for this place more beautiful than any here on Earth. Both Flesh and Spirit use imagery in their argument, but the purpose of imagery in this poem was to try to get the audience to agree with
When reading about the institution of slavery in the United States, it is easy to focus on life for the slaves on the plantations—the places where the millions of people purchased to serve as slaves in the United States lived, made families, and eventually died. Most of the information we seek is about what daily life was like for these people, and what went “wrong” in our country’s collective psyche that allowed us to normalize the practice of keeping human beings as property, no more or less valuable than the machines in the factories which bolstered industrialized economies at the time. Many of us want to find information that assuages our own personal feelings of discomfort or even guilt over the practice which kept Southern life moving
Anne Bradstreet’s inability to perfect her work before it was released frustrated her to the point where she internalizes the book’s imperfections as a reflection of herself. Bradstreet uses an extended metaphor of a mother and a child to compare the relationship between herself as the author and her book. Rather than investing her spirit in God, she repeatedly focuses on trying to improve the quality of her writing with no success, “I washed thy face, but more defects I saw” (Bradstreet 13). Like a mother protecting her child, Bradstreet’s attempts to prevent critics from negatively analyzing her work of art (20). Her continuous obsession about people’s opinions consumed in the Earthly world and essentially distracted her from developing a spiritual relationship with God. Bradstreet was enveloped by her dissatisfaction with her to the point of ridiculing herself, “Thou ill-formed offspring of my feeble mind” (1). It was obvious that her mind and spiritual
“Among all my experiences of God’s gracious dealings with me I have constantly observed this, that He hath never suffered me long to sit loose from him...” (Bradstreet 68). Anne Bradstreet is showing her devotion to God and is focusing on his love and mercy. Bradstreet found inspiration in William Shakespeare but more importantly what drove her poetry was religious beliefs. Being born into a Puritan family, Bradstreet became accustomed to Puritan behavior and had a strong belief in God. Jonathan Edwards, another strong believer in God, had the same Puritan beliefs but thought if a person shall sin they would be destined to end up in hell. Edwards is an extreme pastor and this is shown in the sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.” The two being the ideal Puritan religion have strong opinions on viewing God
In both The Martyrdom of Saints Perpetua and Felicity and Appeal to the Christian Women of the South, the women in the stories are using scripture to explain and justify the claims they make about their faith and the faith of others. They do this by sharing stories about their life and events in their lives to show how the spirit has been moved into them. Both texts describe how these women see themselves as readers of the Bible, what religious authority each is claiming, and what new social reality each woman is arguing that is in keeping of God’s will for human beings.
The first part in this poem, "If ever two were one" (1) sets us with expectations to continue with the reading. These words show that Bradstreet and her husband were really in love, that this love could unite two persons and make them one. Bradstreet and her husband think, act, and feel much like they are part of each other. The tone of this poem tells us that she is a very religious, because she speaks of praying and the heavens. We get the impression that she is a very dedicated person, to her family and to God. She...
The components of marriage, family and loss has played a big role in Anne Bradstreet’s writing of “Before the birth of One of Her Children”, “In Memory of Dear Grandchild Elizabeth Bradstreet”, and Edward Taylor’s “Upon Wedlock and the Death of Children.” In, these writings both authors Puritan culture and their faith plays a big role. In these poems one author starts questioning their God and the other to take honor in their God throughout their grieving process, while both showing different aspects of their everlasting union with their spouse, and the love for their children.
Bradstreet’s last learned lesson is her wealth does not come from the things she gains on earth but her true wealth lies in heaven. She begins Stanzas 37-42 rebuking her thoughts of what will no longer take place in her ash filled home. Furthermore, Bradstreet gives her depiction of the “heavenly” place in Stanzas 43-48; which is built on permanent grounds and consist of expensive furniture all financed by God. In the last Stanzas of the poem Bradstreet begins focusing on the place where wealth is defined:
Anne Bradstreet’s, Verses upon the Burning of our House, July 10th, 1666, describes her feelings over the loss of her home and the difficult position her believes have put her in. Although Bradstreet knew her real home was with the “might Architect” she found it difficult to let go of what she had lost material wise, through the use of personification, imagery and ethos she is able address the path she began to stray from because of these sorrows.
What if I told you that you’d be able to relive the fondest moments of your life as many times as you want in a dream world reality, would you believe me? This may seem far-fetched for some people, but if you take the time to read "The Soul Survives and Functions After Death” by H.H. Price, you’ll start to question your own beliefs about your soul and where it goes once death strikes. Price questions the nature of souls once the inevitable happens and states that the soul goes to another world, a Next World. The idea of the dream world I previously mentioned will make you question your very own beliefs about where your soul will go once life’s inevitable happens to you. So, is Price’s afterlife theory of the Next World really something to
Anne Bradstreet wrote poetry in a time when only Puritan men were publishing writing, mostly about their faith and religion. Thus, she was the first woman in the colonies to be published and received a lot of criticism for it. At this time, there were roles that women were expected to fill, specifically wife and mother roles, and going against these roles could have grand consequences. While her poems may seem simple and domestic, they contain a more complex meaning when looked at closely. Through many of her poems, Bradstreet expressed her frustration towards her society’s gender norms and went against the Patriarchal ideas of the Puritan society.
Religion plays at the centre of the poem as Bradstreet creates an image of the harmonious relationship she shares with her husband. In Puritan culture ‘sex seems to be reduced to strictly a reproductive function’ with sexual passion never being addressed. Similarly, Bradstreet never discusses a physical relationship with her husband but focuses on the spirituality of their connection and thus follows the typical Puritan thinking that sexual connection is not the basis for marriage. ‘Then while we live, in love let’s so persevere/ That we live no more, we may live ever’ captures how religion and spirituality are at the centre of Bradstreet’s marriage. Echoing the typical Christian vows of commitment, Bradstreet finishes with the promise of their love eternal, ‘we may live ever’ through the belief that if they ‘persevere’ and remain true in their relationship it will survive past death. The promise of ‘ever’ is also a biblical reference to the belief that Jesus Christ was the key to ‘be with the Lord forever’ which incorporates the earthly commitment Bradstreet has made with the spiritual one she has made as well. This develops Bradstreet as a true representation of a Puritan as she centres her life and relationships around her religious beliefs rather than focusing on the
Question: The authors of Our Bodies, Ourselves provide a firsthand view of why women’s bodies and sexuality were so central to 1960s-70s feminism. What did these feminists want? What were they being “liberated” from? In other words, what was ground-breaking about this book and how did it represent a significant change?
Anne Fadiman’s "The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down" Critical Analysis: Understanding Religion and Cultural Conflicts and how it Impacts the Society
By reading Bradstreet’s work, a fair sense of what Mrs. Bradstreet was like can be grasped. She clearly stated her opinion of those who objected to her writing: “I am obnoxious to each carping tongue, / Who says my hand a needle better fits.” (Bradstreet,“ The Prologue”155). Bradstreet refused to give up her passion for writing even if it meant going against the opinions of anyone in her colony, including religious leaders. Although Bradstreet referred to herself as being obnoxious, her written works portray an entirely different Bradstreet. She seeks no reward or fame for her writing: “Give thyme or parsley wreath, I ask no bays” (155). Bradstreet seeks no reward for her writing because she doesn’t think her work is very good: “My foolish, broken, blemished Muse so sings” (154). She refers to her writing as her: “ill-formed offspring” (“The Author To Her Book”165). Even after her work is published she is ...
In the first stanza, she clarifies that she will not be writing about war, captain, and kings and that those topics should be addressed by “poets and historians” (Belasco p.153). Bradstreet wants to her writing capabilities to be known, she can only write about common situations. She then display her humbleness, “ but simple I according to my skill” (Belasco p.153). Bradstreet states the tone of her writing in the fifth stanza, “I am obnoxious to each carping tongue..” (Belasco p.153). Anne Bradstreet’s use of language and literary techniques helps her to be able to express her feelings towards her writing. In the first stanza she writes, “For my mean Pen are too superior things or how they all, or each their dates have run.” she uses an irony (Belasco p.153). In this stanza, Bradstreet is displaying her simple creative thinking but in an ironic way comparing it to her inability of writing about certain historic topics. In line thirty-seven, “Let Greeks be Greeks, and women what they are” (Belasco p. 154), she uses alliteration and diction to create a calm effect to lessen the stress of her tone. Anne Bradstreet uses literary techniques to express her thoughts and feelings towards her writings and famous