Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The law of self-defense is undergoing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The law of self-defense is undergoing
Self Defense Are Important To Us Americans
“It’s been said that a man’s home is his castle, but what rights does this afford a homeowner in defense of this castle?” (Purves). People take advantage of this law to use deadly weapons to supposedly defend them. They do not even think about getting away from situations where they feel like they could end up in danger, they feel like they are allowed to use our guns under the Castle Doctrine laws. “The Castle Doctrine gives citizens in their homes – and in some states, cars or workplaces the right to protect themselves, other people, and their property by force – in some instances even deadly force” (Purves). Allowing people to use violence instead of self defense, half the states allow to this occur. “The laws differ from state to state, and what may be considered self defense in one state, might be grounds for a murder or manslaughter, indictment in another” (Purves). Half the states say people should just leave so it does not escalate to bigger conflicts which are the best way to handle a situation. “States like California allow citizens to protect their homes with deadly force if they feel that they or another person are in physical danger” (Purves). The person needs to be sure that they are in danger before even thinking about using deadly force and this is how it should be in every state. Every state should be like California in the duty to retreat law, and it needs to be changed soon because innocent people are dying.
One problem to this ongoing violence is the no duty to retreat law which is saying that you can stand your ground and fight. “A person who is not engaged is an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she had a right to be has no duty to...
... middle of paper ...
...NN, 21 Mar. 2012.
Web. 28 Oct. 2013
Fish, Stanley. “Stand Your Ground, Be a Man.” New York Times. New York Times, 22 July
2013: n.pag. Web. 31 Oct 2013
Gavin, Mary L. “Self Defense Kids Health.” Teens Health. Nemours Foundation, May 2013.
Web. 23 Oct 2013.
Glifford, Bill and Becca Zeifman. “Stuck to Our Guns.” eLibrary. Mens Health, 01 Sep. 2005.
Web. 25 Oct. 2013.
Kellman, Laurie. “Trayvon’s Mom: Clarify Stand Your Ground Laws.” Yahoo News. Yahoo
News, 29 Oct. 2013. Web. 30 Oct. 2013.
Purves, Brendan. “Castle Doctrine from State to State.” The House Issue. South University, n.d.
n.p. Web. 31 Oct. 2013.
“Stand Your Ground Law: Defense vs Agression.” TheLedger.com. TheLedger.com, 13 Aug.
2013. N. pag. Web. 31 Oct. 2013.
White, Jeremy B. “Does California, Like Florida, Have ‘Stand Your Ground’ Law?”
SacBee.com. Sacramento Bee, 18 July 2013. Web. 31 Oct. 2013.
As the government became more involved with tracking these guns they began to run into trouble with people not registering their weapons that fit the guidelines of a firearm that needed to be registered. So the NFA realized that changes needed to be made and it stated that gun owners who already owned the weapon did not have to have it registered. Its main objective was to prohibit interstate traffic in firearms and ammunition, it also denied guns to specific classes of individuals such as felons, minors, fugitives, drug addicts and the mentally ill. Despite all these provisions the law was not one hundred percent effective when came down to the specifics, as criminals were still able to find a way to retrieve firearms. This leading to
Individuals’ right to keep and bear arms in self-defense should be further restricted. For example, George Zimmermann – neighborhood watch citizen responsible for the teenager Treyvon Martin’s death
Since the inception of the Brady Act, over 118 million applications for firearm transfers or permits were subject to background checks. About 2.1 million applications, or 1.8%, were denied.
The article ‘Stand your Ground’ Laws Encourage Vigilantes is a short opinionated piece written by Cynthia Tucker. It covers the topic of self-defense laws more commonly known as stand your ground laws and how she feels they help spread racism towards black citizens, and why they should be repealed. To get her point across to the reader she uses examples of a few high profile cases that demonstrates her opinion. The article also states information about the ...
Is it any coincidence that the states with the loosest gun laws in America tend to contribute to the highest amount of national gun deaths and injuries? This is one of the main questions we should be asking when deciding what is best for our country and its citizens. Although gun control has been an ongoing issue, certain events like the Virginia Tech, Sandy Hook, and the Aurora, Colorado mass shootings have increased our attention to this topic. Although I believe that Americans possess the right to own a firearm, I believe there should be detailed screening and control systems to keep guns out of the wrong hands, to prevent more gun violence from happening in the future.
Oakley, Ann. “Beyond The Yellow Wallpaper.” Reproductive Health Matters 5.10 (1997): 29-39. JSTOR. Web. 7 April 2011.
The “Stand Your Ground” law was first adopted in the state of florida in 2005. This law did not gain national attention until the shooting death of unarmed teenager, Trayvon Martin, in Sanford, florida, where the shooter, George Zimmerman used the “Stand Your Ground” law as his basis for defending himself against Trayvon Martin to the Sanford Police Department. However, George Zimmerman’s legal defense team did not utilize the law to argue his innocence during his trial. But the damage had been done because soon after other cases in florida began to sprout up with “Stand Your Ground” as the driving force.
“A handgun ban is not realistically enforceable. Confiscating guns would require house-to-house searches and alienate the very individuals whose compliances is essential to the success of any regulation. If gun ownership were prohibited, organized crime would step in to provide the firearms that will continue to be procured with criminal intent” (Done Kates). Over the past decade, the media has reported an increase in the severity of violent crimes as individuals have killed and hurt many others, including kids. Since 2006 there have been over 200 mass murders in the United States. Between 2006 and 2011 alone, the FBI has counted over 172 cases of mass killings, not including those unreported from different police agencies to the FBI (“Murders
Stand your ground is a subject that has been plastered in many community’s backyards across the nation, a subject that has left many senseless killings. Self-defense has two laws that represent and explains the two perspectives of views. The Castle Doctrine laws strengthen the right to self-defense by eliminating the duty to retreat from a threat in one’s own home or on one’s own property, so when one build on that concept they come up with stand your ground laws which extends the Castle Doctrine, any place where a person has the right
If a person don’t carry a concealed weapon, how will they be able to protect themselves and their precious family from vicious criminals? Shall issue states are states that citizens may apply and be considered by the state for a gun permit which is also known as concealed carry. John R. Lott, is an economist and has received his Ph.D. in economics from UCLA. He claimed "shall-issue" concealed carry laws reduced murders by 8.5%, rapes by 5%, aggravated assaults by 7%, and robbery by 3%, according to a 2000 analysis of FBI crime data” (Lott, John R.) This refers to how concealed carry reduces crime and information was reported by the FBI compared to the other states that don’t allow concealed carry. This quote shows real evidence on how guns
With many recent incidents that involve guns between 2012 and 2013, gun control laws have become a hot topic in America. On one hand, after the horrific incident like the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting at Newtown in 2012, most people wanting to limit guns from getting into the wrong by setting up a rigorous system that control who can and cannot obtain a gun. On the other hand, we have the people who believe that with such rigorous system in place is violated the individual rights that granted and protected by the United States Constitution. They believe that the rigorous system will prevent people from defending themselves and could be a violation of their privacy. Regardless of which side is right, if we want to understand more about our current conflict, we have to look back on how this hold debate started. The District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court case in 2008 that found the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 unconstitutional, which influence the individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense by questioning the Second Amendment and laws that restrict a person from acquire guns.
This debate has produced two familiar interpretations of the Second Amendment. Advocates of stricter gun control laws have tended to stress that the amendment’s militia clause guarantees nothing to the individual and that it only protects the states’ rights to be able to maintain organized military units. These people argue that the Second Amendment was merely used to place the states’ organized military forces beyond the federal government’s power to be able to disarm them. This would guarantee that the states would always have sufficient force at their command to abolish federal restraints on their rights and to resist by arms if necessary. T...
Stand-your-ground Law - "Stand-your-ground Law." Wikipedia. The World of the. Wikimedia Foundation, 28 Mar.
“A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The right of all Americans to bear arms is a right the Founding Fathers held to equal importance as the Constitution itself. Gun control laws directly violate this right and therefore should not even be under consideration. Even if that issue is overlooked, gun control advocates state that in order to reduce firearm related violence, gun control laws must be implemented to remove the violence caused by firearms. Although this may seem reasonable, the consequences of such laws are ironically counterproductive; they exacerbate the problem instead of fixing it. Besides the fact that the American Constitution guarantees its citizens the right to bear arms, the idea of restricting gun ownership in order to reduce firearm-related violence would ultimately fail given the previous experiments of gun control in England and in numerous states.
As you can see, these four nonviolent civil rights organizations have paved the way for a lot of the civil rights that our society has today. In many ways, these groups had very similar traits and goals, like to be able to end segregation and improve the civil rights of African Americans. They also shared practices of nonviolence to get there through strenuous sit-ins, marches, and the freedom rides. These groups acted very similarly throughout their fight, but they also had their differences. NAACP was a group who worked behind the scenes through the judicial battle while CORE was credited for leading the charge of the Freedom Rides. SCLC and SNCC were considered pretty similar by most standards, but even they had their differences with age