First Degree Murder Conviction

881 Words2 Pages

To be found guilty of first degree murder, it must be proven that killed someone with malice aforethought, meaning it was planned, premeditated. First degree murder is to kill malevolence, to kill either intentionally and deliberately or recklessly with the utmost disregard for human life. Premeditation may be fashioned immediately and does not require a lengthy period of contemplation. The death penalty is recognized in Thirty-eight states. Capital first-degree murder or aggravated first-degree murder is categorized in killings viewed as deserving of capital punishment. Life imprisonment or death penalty is the punishment resulted in a conviction. States who do not recognized the death penalty, aggravated murder carries life imprisonment. When aggravated or capital murder is committed in a heinous or monstrous fashion, it is considered homicide (Lippman, 2006). To plan or deliberate is premeditation. Depending on the circumstances and the person, there must be an amount of time needed to plan and commit murder (actus reas). There must a period of time long enough for the person to form the intent (mens rea) to kill for them to be fully aware in their mind to consider the murder (Lectlaw, 2010). In California, first-degree murder includes the “willful, deliberate, and premeditated,” or to what is committed in the perpetration, or the attempt to perpetrate, certain felonies, which includes burglary, excluding petty offense of shoplifting (Cal. Penal Code S 189) (Lectlaw, 2010). The “mens rea” of first degree murder is that the person, with time and intent, planned out or premeditated the murder. The “actus reas” of first degree murder is the actual act of committing the murder after planning it (Lippman, 2006). ... ... middle of paper ... ...t I do not think that the evidence presented is enough for a conviction to sentence any man or woman to death. This case was publicized way too much on national television. Just like the rape case for the Kobe Bryant trial, there was way too much media involvement, resulting in the leak of the victim’s name which started the case to downhill from there. If the media was not heavily involved which led to the victim being pressured by scrutiny and threats, Kobe Bryant probably would have been convicted of rape with the victim being a witness on the stand with her testimony. Don’t get me wrong, if a person proven guilty of murder, especially as heinous as this crime was, they deserve the death penalty but only if there was “no shadow of a doubt” hard pieces of evidence, more real proof, not circumstantial evidence, are connecting that person to the crime.

Show More
Related

  • The Model Penal Code (MPC)

    263 Words  | 1 Pages

    Murder should include the elements of purposely, knowingly, or recklessly under circumstances showing extreme indifference to the value of human life (Brody & Acker, 2010).

    Read More

  • Capital Murder Informative Speech

    508 Words  | 2 Pages

    1st degree murder is murder with malice aforethought. Malice aforethought is a murder that was planned out. 1st degree is also murder with the intent to kill and it is

    Read More

  • Essay On Scott Peterson

    941 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ut right because i don’t think that any other sentence would be okay. This outcome was correct because he doesn’t get to walk as a free man or even live his life how he was and he doesn’t have the chance to hurt anyone else. If you hurt your child and your wife, who that is supposed to be who you love and protect the most when you are an older man. When you choose to hurt them, your own family i believe you will hurt anyone then. I think that the defendant did receive a fair trial because there were more than 6 jurors, there were about 9, because of the ones who got kicked off, due to different reasons. I think that it was many different point of views. I believe that he received no special treatment, there was so many points and evidence against him, including the lies, and everything he lied about. I think that there was no special treatment to even go his way.

    Read More

  • Does Jodi Arias Deserve the Death Penalty?

    954 Words  | 2 Pages

    Few trials have been polarized to the extent that the Jodi Arias murder trial has. There are several factors set out in determining the proper punishment in a case like this, but does this trial meet all the criteria? There is a lot of evidence to go over in respect to the Jodi Arias trial and much of it is very compelling, but do people understand the difference between a woman guilty of murder and a woman who is legally eligible for the death penalty. Many people do not recognize the boundaries between legal and personal belief when it comes to murder trials. People tend to have a preconceived notion of the crime committed and their own ideas regarding the death penalty, but not many people take into account the specifics that must be met in order to enforce a law. So the question now remains; did Jodi Arias commit a murder that is eligible for the death penalty? More importantly, should Jodi Arias receive the death penalty based on the criteria? Jodi Arias should receive the death penalty because she has been convicted of murder, and also because the murder fits all criteria set forth by the state of Arizona in regards to being eligible for the death penalty.

    Read More

  • Cyntoia Brown Murder Case Study

    613 Words  | 2 Pages

    Cyntoia Brown the police departments identification team said Johnny Allen, the man Cyntoia murdered appeared to be in the position he was when they found him that he was in when he was shot. His positioning was with his hands folded under his head like he had been asleep when he was shot, and not reaching for a gun like Cyntoia said. If she was killing him out of self defense then there was no reason that she needed to steal his wallet, two guns to sell for money as she stated in her confession to the police department, and then drove his truck to a nearby walmart. Instead, she should have contacted the police and stated that she was a minor that was solicited for sex and shot her abuser out of self defense, but she didn’t do this. She fled the crime scene and stole from the man she murdered, this looks really bad for her case to prove that she was the victim that stood up to her

    Read More

  • Case of Sylvia Likens: Tortured and Abused

    1406 Words  | 3 Pages

    First degree murder is classified by murder with a malicious intent; it also includes murder while committing a crime. Second degree murder is the act of killing a person with no prior intent. Involuntary murder, which is sometimes called third degree murder, is murder that results from a disregard for human life; this would include acts such as drunk driving. Finally, voluntary murder occurs when a person with no prior intent to kill enters a circumstance in which his emotions get the best of him and murder occurs.

    Read More

  • Second-Degree Murder

    398 Words  | 1 Pages

    There are many differences between first-degree murder, second-degree murder, voluntary manslaughter, and involuntary manslaughter. If someone is not aware of the laws it could get tricky for them. A first-degree murder is when it was planned ahead of time, premeditated, intentional killing that’s a felony murder. For example a man was planning how to kill his wife to try and hide evidence because she cheated on him with his best friend for about 2 years. When investigators arrive to the scene they will observe and determine it was first-degree murder because of the way that things were made. The charges for this crime are life in prison without the possibility of parole

    Read More

  • ' The Stranger, And Meursault's Trial For Murder?

    1702 Words  | 4 Pages

    Murder is defined by Curtis (1910) as the act of killing another human being (p.639). This is done unlawfully and with malice aforethought. Most of the time, those convicted of murder are found guilty for reasons of previous violence with the victim, intention on the action, and how much they dwelt on their feelings (Spackman, Belcher, Calapp, & Taylor, 2002, p.616). For example, if the defendant had a history of violence against the victim, intended the action, and dwelt on their feelings, they were most likely to be convicted of

    Read More

  • In Cold Blood Research Paper

    942 Words  | 2 Pages

    First is homicide. What does homicide mean? Homicide is the killing of a person (human being). Among homicides are murder and manslaughter, but not all homicides are a crime. A non-criminal homicide includes self-defense, a hunting accident or car wreck (can’t be reckless driving). Suicide is a homicide, but in most cases there is no one to prosecute if the suicide was successful, but if someone assisted or attempted suicide they could be charged for the crime. (Remember the meaning of homicide by remembering that cide, is from the Latin word cida, which refers to killing, while the Latin homo means "man.” So homicide means “killing a man.”) (Vocabulary.com, 2014) In the first 48 video “Red Handed” part Anthony Julian “Tony” Montoya was shot and rushed to the hospital where he later died. Apparently two people came to the door in ski masks and Mr. Montoya answered the door and when he went to shut the door a gun was shot and he was hit with the bullet. In “In Cold Blood” Herbert Abraham’s family member, had been trying calling him and could not get in touch with him. The family member called the police and asked them to see if they could check on him. When they police arrived they could see that a window was cracked open. The police knocked on the door and didn’t get a response. The police went into Mr. Herbert Abraham’s apartment...

    Read More

  • Scott Peterson Research Paper

    470 Words  | 1 Pages

    This trial was not based on facts but based on emotions. “Prosecutors didn't have a murder weapon, cause of death, witness, or a definite motive” (Kristal Hawkins, pg.9). All the evidence pointed to Peterson's innocence and yet the jury decided upon his fate because of his emotions through out the trials. “They cited Peterson's apparent lack of emotion as a factor in their decision” (Hawkins, Pg.10). With lack of evidence against Peterson, the jury should not have convicted an innocent man.

    Read More

  • Death Penalty In America

    1589 Words  | 4 Pages

    When it comes to the usage of the death penalty in America, we all know Texas isn’t shy about sentencing criminals to death. A few years ago, in 2011, Lawrence Russell Brewer was executed by the Texas government for the murder of James Byrd Jr in 1998 (Barranco). Forensic evidence proved Byrd’s cause of death was due to decapitation when he hit a culvert in the road while being pulled from the back of Brewer’s pickup truck. Despite the evidence, in court Brewer still claimed to be an innocent bystander, because one of his buddies allegedly sliced Byrd’s throat before he was chained to the truck and dragged for three and a half miles (CNN Wire Staff). Even after Brewer’s personal statement which said, “As far as any regrets go, no, I have no

    Read More

  • Why Is Death Penalty Wrong

    940 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since the death penalty has been put in there has been numerous cases where innocent people have been put to death, including Claude Jones. “ The tests revealed that a strand of hair found at the scene of a liquor-store shooting did not belong to Claude Jones, as was originally implied by the prosecution.  Instead, the hair belonged to the victim.  Jones was executed for the murder of the store's owner. The strand of hair was the only piece of physical evidence that placed Jones at the scene of the crime, and this revelation raises the question of whether Texas executed the wrong person for the murder.” (Executed But Possibly Innocent). Cases like this one in specific show the negatives of the death penalty. If there was no death penalty they wouldn't have rushed to execute him on false information and this DNA mix-up would've come to light while he was still in prison. But instead of him walking free an innocent man was put to death. Another example of a miscarriage of justice is in the case of Cameron Willingham who was executed in 2004 for an alleged 1992 arson and triple murder. ”Arson expert Gerald Hurst said, "There's nothing to suggest to any reasonable arson investigator that this was an arson fire. It was just a fire." Former Louisiana State University fire instructor Kendall Ryland added, "[It] made me sick to think this guy was executed based on this investigation.... They executed this guy and they've just got no idea - at least not scientifically - if he set the fire, or if the fire was even intentionally set.” (Executed But Possibly Innocent). Willingham was put to death on little to no evidence that there was even a crime committed let alone that it was him that did it. He was put to death despite multiple experts saying it wasn't even an arson fire. Even a single wrong death by the U.S. government isn't acceptable and there are many proven to be wrongful convictions that no death penalty could've

    Read More

  • The Importance Of The Death Penalty In The United States

    476 Words  | 1 Pages

    Half of them were innocent people, the death penalty should be banned in America because it is a barbaric and violates the “cruel and unusual” clause in the bill of rights. The 8th amendment of the U.S. constitution prevents the use of cruel and unusual punishment which would interpret the death penalty as violating this restriction. We must look over the “eye for an eye” which shows a revenge mentality, A revenge mentality ends to an endless cycle of violence it is important to send the right message to society. By this killing people who kill people to show killing is wrong is the wrong message to send people. Life in prison should be considered other than the death penalty, this gives the victims family justice and the criminal family a chance as well. On the other hand, death penalty cost taxpayer’s money way more than a prosecutor seeking life without parole. Carrying out one death sentence cost 2-5 times than keeping the same criminal in prison for the rest of his or her

    Read More

  • Definition Essay: Murder

    1307 Words  | 3 Pages

    Murder is considered a serious crime in our country. The loosely defined term of murder implies that a person who kills another human being with intent is known as being the worst kind of violent crime we see in our society. Any unlawful killing requires that a living person be killed and it does not mean that the guilty person feels any hatred or spite in order to plan and execute the act of murder. Moreover, the destructive acts that end peoples lives are classified as homicides which include manslaughter and first and second degree murder. More important, the justice system has put different labels on such crimes, but it also allows room for criminals to get away with murder.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On The Death Penalty

    1343 Words  | 3 Pages

    In March of 1985, Kirk Bloodsworth was convicted and sentenced to death for viciously killing and raping a 9 year old girl. Several eyewitnesses claimed to have all of the evidence the prosecution would need for a conviction and death sentence. However, 9 years later DNA evidence proved that Bloodsworth had not actually committed a crime at all. After being forced to waste 9 years of his life in prison, Bloodsworth was finally released. The Guardian reports that “at least 4.1% of all defendants sentenced to death in the US in the modern era are innocent” (Pilkington). This is a compelling statistic when lives are in the balance. The death penalty has posed countless problems to the United States’ judicial system that could easily be avoided

    Read More

More about First Degree Murder Conviction

Open Document