The First Amendment In The Constitution Of The United States Constitution

2685 Words6 Pages

The United States Constitution is the official document of the United States of America. The framers of the Constitution formed this document in order to establish order, and make sure its writings were diametrically opposed to what they experienced under British rule. This Constitution was to ensure freedom, and protect the rights of the people. While protecting the rights of the people, the Constitution was deemed to be enough for the people. Because the framers wanted more liberties for the people, civil liberties were established and the Bill of Rights was adopted into the Constitution. If we examine the order of the bill of rights as we do the articles of the Constitution, then we could assume that the first amendment would be deemed the most important. The First Amendment says this, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” In particular, Congress decided to mention in the first amendment the act of religion. This is was obviously of grave importance to the framers. The language in this amendment was very clear and demonstrative. It is quite obvious that the US did not want to be associated with any particular religion; neither did they want to prohibit any persons from practicing whatever religion they so decided. It is commonly perceived that this Establishment Clause of the first amendment was so that the US government would not promote in religion over another. In doing this, it was also assumed that there would be no special favoritism shown toward any group of people on the basis of religio... ... middle of paper ... ...se such activities were apparent, this proved that the rejection of RSO status did not hinder the organization in any way from being an active and effective organization (Northwest). Such a case should be an example to organizations abroad. The underlying fact is, rejection does not equal unconstitutionality. As long as people are granted the rights that are outlined, not only in the first amendment and supported by the fourteenth amendment as well, in the Bill of Rights. Because there are sure to be problems that will arise concerning the first amendment, especially concerning speech and religion, cases like these will never suffice to solve civil liberty issues. What government must do as they did in this case is to make sure the rulings are in line with the constitution, and rule in accordance to that which is constitutionally sound and not emotionally befitting.

More about The First Amendment In The Constitution Of The United States Constitution

Open Document