Correction Of Error In English

1670 Words4 Pages

Correction of students’ errors is an integral part of the educational process. The effectiveness of this type of activity, ultimately determines the effectiveness of the educational process as a whole. Proper error correction and feedback are the main components of the professional competence of foreign language teachers. The teacher should control students' speech literacy. However, permanent and persistent correction of errors makes the process of language acquisition ineffective because foreign language learners often experience psychological pressure, fear of mistakes, worry and fear of foreign speech in this situation. At the same time, without negative feedback students are likely to develop so-called "fossil" in their speech (Shahin, 2011). It is the wrong linguistic form on a regular basis stated in the speech and continues to repeat itself in a distorted form, regardless of how great the impact of the target language (ibid). Facing with an error, the teacher must quickly find an effective, methodologically justified and psychologically loyal way to deal with it. There are different types of strategies to deal with this problem. This essay attempts to evaluate the most popular error correction strategies in spoken English used by second language teachers. In order to choose which strategy to use teachers have to decide which error to correct and when to correct. Errors are classified according to the aspects of language, such as phonetic, lexical and grammatical (Krashen, 2003). Depending on the influence on speech recognition there are also strong and weak errors (ibid). If the student's work has obviously expressed communicative nature and focuses on the content only those errors that impede understanding should be corre... ... middle of paper ... ...lass and they prefer to correct erroneous utterance immediately. Studies show that over 50% of corrective feedback strategies used in the classroom was the recast even though it is considered as less effective one (Lyster and Ranta, 1997). As researchers conclude that it would be more beneficial and effective for the second language learners to have a chance for self-correction which is likely to increase students’ critical thinking ability, teachers are expected to use only those strategies which will lead to self-correction. However, all the strategies have their advantages and disadvantages. That is why type of error, whether it is phonetic, grammatical or lexical, and the students’ proficiency level and age should be taken into account by the teacher, because the same strategy may have different results according to the students’ levels and age (Dabaghi, 2010).

Open Document