Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
north america women issues in military
north america women issues in military
essay on the changing role of women in the military
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: north america women issues in military
Women’s Responsibility in the Military-The Right to Fight Many women around the world have big responsibilities in the military, and although some people may disagree, I believe they can handle anything a man can handle when it comes to being on the battlefield. Some people think that women should not be able to fight in the military, where as other people think they should be able to fight in the military. Each supporter and non-supporter has their own reasons. Some of the reasons for the non-supporters are because of their gender. They think that because they are women, they cannot handle the challenges that being on the battlefield brings. Women are willing to fight, and they know what can happen, they know exactly what can happen. They are willing to fight for their country, and I believe they should be able to. The men that fight for our country are against women fighting in combat. They believe that women are not capable of doing what they do to defend and fight for our country. The men feel that they cannot trust women to help back them up at war simply because of the fact that they are women. There are some opponents of the ban of women fighting in combat that say that having women and men together in war may lead to women accusing the men of sexual harassment, and it can happen, and it has before. All women that fight in war claim that it is a problem happening persistently, not stopping. It happened to a female soldier in the navy. She claimed she was being sexually harassed by shipmates. She reported one man that just would not stop harassing her and then she waited for him to be brought to justice. Some people say that they have seen commanders “look away” when women reported being sexually harassed, meaning that ... ... middle of paper ... ...s military and they have been for a long time, so why not just make it official that women are allowed to serve in war? Our president influences the decision of women in war. He made the statement “Today every American can be proud that our military will grow even stronger, with our mothers, wives, sisters and daughters playing a greater role in protecting this country we love." The meaning of this is women play very important roles in the military, and they are the reason our military is growing stronger. The pentagon will lift the1994 ban officially in 2016. They are giving it three more years because it takes time for final decisions to be made, although little decision have been made since 1994 and the ban is getting lifted more and more each year. Soon women will officially be allowed to serve in the military, and have thousands of front line jobs open to them.
Women should be allowed in combat roles in the armed forces because they are just as capable as men. To begin, women such as Shaye Haver and Kristen Griest, graduates of the Fort Benning Ranger School, have shown that they can meet the same physical requirements as men. Nevertheless, these women still weren’t allowed to serve in combat positions despite the rigorous training they completed that involved grueling obstacles they had to complete all while carrying 100-pound gear. Does that make any sense to you? It didn’t to me and it certainly didn’t to women like Sgt. Patricia A. Bradford who said “If you have to be able to lift a certain amount of weight in order to do a certain job, then the weight is not going to know whether you’re male or female.” (Women at Arms: On the Ground.). In fact, in some instances women have proved to be even more
With society’s past and present it is apparent that women are still not equal even if they have the title. Men are observably stronger and have a different mentality in situations than women. This is not to say that women should not be in the military but they should have the choice that way they can accept the responsibility and train themselves mentally and physically to achieve the responsibility and respect needed to fight for our country.
Women and the Draft Imagine a big war that has suddenly broken out between America and another country. The military suddenly realizes that in order to better their army and be stronger, they need more people to join and fight alongside them. The military decides their needs are drafted. However, men are the only ones eligible to be apart of the draft. Should this be something that should be changed with the military?
When it comes to being in combat I believe that women and men should have the same opportunity to do whatever they want in the military. So therefore, I agree that women should participate in combat. I believe that a woman is capable to do anything that a man can do physically and mentally. If I was in combat and had to fight with a person of a different gender I would not mind it at and would treat them just like another person I fight with. If someone is willing to give their life for our country I’m all for it does not matter their gender or race. As you read “All Guts, No Glory” by Molly M. Ginty you will see that women have made great sacrifices for their unit they served in and for our country. A women that is willing to go to the front
With a woman in combat, it would keep our service larger. (Sisters in Arms RSS, 2009). Men take up 67%, with woman serving 22% of all of the military in the United States of America today. (Sisters in Arms RSS, 2009) Imagine if that percentage of woman got larger. It would push the men to be better than them, equally making our nations military larger. Therefore, if we have more military, we have more defense for this
So by singing the papers they handed them-selves over to the military life. My point is if they are already in-listed and that women wants to go fight on the front lines with men well let them, because the more men and women we have the stronger the USA’s military will be stronger. Why should women be allowed
...nto a situation of high testosterone, women are not considered to be a threat. Military research now however, has shown that women have the physical stamina to endure battle and do not disrupt the cohesion in the male units and can also be mentally tough without breaking when under fire. Women are not only discriminated against in the military, they are also discriminated against in Philosophy, religion, and Popular Culture.
Do you think it is fair for women not to go into battle even if they want to help out the military? Even though women are thought of being weak, some women are more capable than other men in battle. The issue is that people never think of women strong. They just think of men and how men are stronger. I think that women should go to battle because they train for the same thing as men. If people need examples and why women should be in combat, I will explain and show you why women should have the same rights as men to serve in the military.
People may think its ok for our women of America to participate in combat, but I do not agree with that at all. I think woman should leave combat to the men of our country. These women can get hurt or anything it’s too much of a risk, also as a man I don’t think anybody would feel comfortable fighting a woman. We should be trying to do everything we can to protect the women that is proudly serving our country, and not putting them in harm’s way. Women should be protected at all times as well as being respected at all times also, putting women out there in danger is basically concerning and mind blowing. Then say if the woman gets badly hurt on duty or anything the man or men would feel bad about it. If I myself was to serve into the military,
...h injuries, etc., and we need them for those jobs. Why put them on the frontlines when they don’t even have the physical strength to do so? There would be a few women that would be strong enough but we have to think of the compatibility of the whole unit and how they would react to each other (Weathers 4). We don’t want the men or women feeling uncomfortable while fighting for our freedom. If the men feel like the women would slow them down then we unquestionably don’t need to have women fight on the frontlines. Women should not fight on the frontlines because of equality with men, war is not about being equal. There are some good points about women fighting on the frontlines alongside men but there are more cons than pros. Women should not fight on the frontlines along side of men for many reasons, especially because women are naturally weaker than men.
To begin with women have already been in supporting services that put them on frontline and enemy territory. Women in the U.S. military have been putting themselves on the same standard of risk for decades. “They currently make up about 20 percent of the national armed forces. Of the approximately 280,000 females who have been deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan in the past 12 years, 152 have died and at least 800 have been wounded”. (Fortin, 2013) In my experience as combat photographer, my gender had no impact on the missions I was assigned. My male counterparts did not view me as a liability, but as fellow soldier. My ability to keep up and successfully complete my tasks was not hindered by chromosomes. There are numerous MOS’s (military occupational specialties) that while not specifically being considered a combat centric job requires females to be stationed in considerably hazardous areas. These jobs range from military police to combat photographers, and even linguists. Women have already been on the frontlines for years, it was just never officially stated by military higher ups. By officially stating that women can be allowed in combat positions, it would just reinforce a progressive change already implemented in modern
Across the history, women Suffer from luck of their right. Culture and civilization was not respect women and put them in the lower layer in their social pyramid. Kill them were they alive, while other give them a life with a lot of misery and obstacle, which is the same thing or killing them better than these life . At the few previous centuries, the world growth and become more opening. people understanding that they are needing women in a lot of job outside their home as men. Sadly, when we came to combat sector, we stop thinking logically. It is men major one hundred percent . If we look to the book (1001 things everyone should know about women's history) which written by Constance Jones (2000) we can find that only 88013 women among history had the ability to take part in military by give a variety of services. Some country actually these day try to make it happen. For instance the first country was allowed women in military was Norway around 1985. Then, it followed by thirteen other countries. It still small percentage compared with the world. It is the right of women to join army and take part in combat, because they are capable as men in adapting with situation. Also, they have equally amount in cerebration and they have the right to decide their own destiny.
Many agree, that in certain military occupations, women can function at the same level as men. The controversy about having women fighting with men in wars is the fact that they have a different physical structure, deal with stress and emotions differently , are more susceptible to injury and just don't have the killer instinct necessary to get the job done. Although the last statement might appear to be a stereotype, most women would not be capable of supporting the demanding rigors of war-like situations. It would be a great mistake to allow women in these stressful and dangerous situations.
Women have always played significant parts in the United States military throughout the years; even though in the early years they where not allowed to enlist, they still performed certain duties that was vital to the military. However the roles that women have played have often been limited to certain duties. Women in the past where limited in what they where allowed to do, but more and more opportunities are opening for them as times change and women continue to fight for equal rights.
The problem with the United States Armed Forces is that women are not allowed in combat. Not including women in the combat policy will not strengthen the Armed Forces but will weaken them. Women in the combat are a controversial topic. During the several wars, women were used in a many capacities, including nursing, spying, supplying and maintaining camps, as well as the occasional combat activity as necessary. The controversy of today has a lot to do with the role of women in combat, and how their presence will impact male soldiers. There have been very few women in history that is given credit for being a war hero. Why should a man always be the hero when a woman is capable of doing the job as well? For many years women have been have been doing the job for a lot longer than that, but never got the credit they deserved. This problem affects everyone because it decreases morale. This problem is not getting any better. Women train in the same manner as the men, but never get to use their training. This is a fraud, waste and abuse, and a definite waste of money. Throughout history, women had to fight for equal rights. For example, the Nineteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified and women won the right to vote. The civil rights movements of the 1960s inspired a second wave of keen activism confronting the inequities women faced in virtually all areas of American life. State and federal laws were passed outlawing discrimination in employment and education, and women responded to their new opportunities with enthusiasm. This is a form of discrimination. As a woman I am angry about the fact that women are not assigned to combat duty equally with men.