Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on colonial women
An essay on colonial women
An essay on colonial women
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The feminist epistemology has three approaches: feminist empiricist, feminist standpoint and feminist postmodern. Feminist empiricism feel that the traditional ways of obtaining knowledge through social science is still valid; however, gender biases need to be removed in order to fully gain a true knowledge (Travers, 2010, p. 26). Feminist empiricists feel that women are the best tools to obtain objectivity. According to Travers (2010), “women (or feminist, whether men or women) as a group are more likely to produce unbiased and objective results than are men (or nonfeminist) as a group” (p. 27). In the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry, Berger (1988) researched the effects that the pipeline would have on the North. Through out the Inquiry Berger gave evidence on how the pipeline would effect the environment, hunting, fishing and the native economy and the social impacts it would have on the community. Berger (1988) looked at specific impacts that the pipeline would bring and states that it would have cost on welfare, crime and violence, health and heath services, and alcohol (p. 202-205). Berger fails to consider the impacts that the pipeline would have on indigenous women living in the North. Almost all testimonies from the people living in the North are males. There is surely indigenous women living up north and the lack of women’s claims causes a major bias in the social research Berger has conducted. If a women researcher was to conduct this Inquiry up North, I feel that there would be a greater diversity of perspectives in regards to the social impacts the pipeline potentially could cause. According to Travers (2010), “[f]eminist empiricists are critical of the sexism that influences what problems are considered appropriate for scientific study, who gets to study them, what assumptions about gender norms are ignored, and invisibility of women and issues of concern to women in the sciences” (p. 27). Before Berger conducted the Inquiry, who and why was a male researcher chosen, what topics were to be explored, and if there was evidence pertaining to women, did Berger ignore them? Whose views to research are being looked at? (Smith, 1999, p. 187). Even when we look at the people who are chosen to do this research, would the research results be any different if there was an indigenous researcher? (Smith, 1999, p. 127). These questions are all important to feminist empiricists. Research does not just become bias because there is a male researcher, it is because men have been trained a specific way.
In this proposal our team seeks to explore the injustices within the Indian Act. To achieve this our proposed research will examine the target population being the aboriginal woman. The paper will further explore the oppressions faced by the aboriginal women within the Indian Act. In conclusion, this proposal will sum up the negative impact that the Indian Act had on aboriginal women and how it continues to oppress this population within the Canadian National discourse.
As many of these issues are addressed daily, we have to take into consideration that a lot of these claims can be considered ethical in reasoning. In this instance, Jill Filipovic uses rational arguments to provide examples and studies to build a case that women are not just “playing the women card” but that there are real issues that they face simply because of their gender. Even though there are weaknesses within the evidence and claims being made, Filipovic does not violate any values or falsely misleads her audience. There are no signs of Filipovic attempting to prevent or silence the voices of the other side of the argument. Nor does Filipovic use her article to relay emotional stories of women being discriminated against causing her audience to be overwhelmed, causing them to loose sign in the true issue at hand. It seems that her purpose is to inform the readers in hopes that it will bring about change or awareness. Finally, Filipovic does not, in any way, attack any individuals or groups of people. She does dress the topic of discrimination between men and women but the topic is never addressed
Feminism and Indigenous women activism is two separate topics although they sound very similar. In indigenous women’s eyes feminism is bashing men, although Indigenous women respect their men and do not want to be a part of a women’s culture who bring their men down. Feminism is defined as “The advocacy of women 's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes.” In theory feminism sounds delightful despite the approaches most feminists use such as wrong-full speaking of the opposite gender. Supposedly, feminism is not needed as a result of Indigenous women being treated with respect prior to colonization. Thus, any Native woman who calls herself a feminist is often condemned as being “white”. This essay argues that Indigenous women may
‘Women and men are different. Equal treatment of men and women does not result in equal outcomes.’ (Corsten Report, 16: 2007) According to Covington and Bloom (2003) numerous feminist writers have demonstrated and documented the patriarchal nature of our society and the variety of ways in which the patriarchal values serve masculine needs. ‘Despite claims to the contrary, masculinist epistemologies are built upon values that promote masculine needs and desires, making all others invisible’ (Kaschak, 11: 1992).
Feminism analyzes how men have more social power than women and as a result, they use their social privileges above women (Ravelli and Webber 70). Likewise, feminism examines the political and social inequality occurring between both genders and highlight the patriarchy of men (Ravelli and Webber 70). Patriarchy is used to describe how male dominate the culture and the social system (Ravelli and Webber 71). When feminists understand a women’s experience, they consider her race and social class this is the concept of intersectionality (Ravelli and Webber 73). In intersectionality, they recognize the oppression women experience various for every individual (Ravelli and Webber 73). In the Aboriginal community, violence occurs because of the men’s inability to be superior. Although functionalism and feminism explain the disruption in the Aboriginal community, functionalism demonstrates a greater responsibly the police force has for the
Mcnab, Miriam. "Aboriginal Women's Issues". The Canadian Encyclopedia. Toronto: Historica Canada, 2006. Web. 8 Feb 2006
Aboriginal women in Canada do not suffer direct (physical) violence only (e.g. domestic violence, rape, sexual assault) but also suffer indirect violence which is structural violence as explained by Galtung (1969). Structural violence is a hidden form of operational violence against women (Farmer 1996). It is built into the fabric of many societies today (indigenous politics, 2005). There are well documented evidence on gender inequalities which leads to inadequate human development and expectancy of life in general (Indigenous politics, 2005) These evidences show the lack of governmental support for working women which is universal (including Canada who is low on the GII) (GII report 2014). Structural violence is built maintained in the society through socio-cultural and political constructions/norms (Confortini 2006) which are used to manipulate, dominate and control women (Canadian women’s
Thornton, Margaret. "Feminism And The Changing State: The Case Of Sex Discrimination." Australian Feminist Studies 21.50 (2006): 151-172. Academic Search Complete. Web. 19 May
Moving toward critical analysis on the basis of gender and power relations signaled a shift of focus from the methodological to the epistemological concerns for the feminists. The questions raised were about the source of the behavior and experiences. Even within this view of gendered relation two different types permeated the feminist community – those that subscribed to an essentialist view held that women’s development is uniquely different from that of men and they are much better than men; those that adhered to the social constructionist view took the position that true natures of men and women are unknowable, i.e. the characteristics attributed to males and females are not intrinsic but socially and situationally created. Gilligan (1982)
30, No. 4, New Feminist Approaches to Social Science Methodologies, Special Issue Editors, Sandra Harding and Kathryn
Feminist Theory is an aspect of considering feminism as having been based on socio-phenomenon issues rather than biological or scientific. It appreciates gender inequality, analyzes the societal roles played by feminists in a bid to promote the interests, issues and rights of women in the society. It is also based on the assumption that women play subsidiary roles in the society. The whole idea of feminism has however experienced hurdles in the form of stereotyping by the wider society. This paper tries to examine some of the effects of stereotypes that feminism goes through, what other philosophers say and the way forward towards ending stereotyping.
“Scientists Not Immune from Gender Bias, Yale Study Shows.” Yale News. Yale University, 24 Sept. 2012. Web. 05 Mar. 2014.
As feminism has changed in the Western sphere, women have become driven to be creators of the ethnography (literature, rather than the method of generating it) that pertains to them. Many woman authors and scholars rose in response to the prior, predominantly male work in cultural anthropology. Feminism has also influenced the intersectionality of cultural anthropology, as feminism has expended from just Western, white, straight feminist types that had dominated in the past. Anthropological works, already focused on power relations and other such complexities in cultures, have also undergone significant effort to examine power relations even within categories, and to avoid generalization and homogenization of
Feminist theory is the extension of feminism into theoretical, fictional or philosophical dissertation. It helps to explain the main nature of gender inequality. It further explains the social roles of women in the society such as education, communication, philosophy, sociology and so on (Chodrow, Nancy 1991).
Minas, A. (2000). Gender basics: Feminist perspective on women and men.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.