Stone And Seto's Max Performance Feedback, By Sadri And Seto

1444 Words3 Pages

In Feedback as a gift, Friedrich discusses his points on how feedback should be viewed. The author describes feedback as a gift and if we view it that way it would change our mindsets when receiving it. On another note the article by Stone and Heen, Difficult conversations 2.0: Thanks for the feedback, the main focus is on the benefits we receive from accepting feedback and becoming a skillful receiver. The author also discusses why we as humans reject feedback calling these reactions triggers. In Max Performance Feedback, Sadri and Seto discuss the three different types of feedback. Each articles content is crucial to one’s professional development. In Feedback as a gift, Friedrich makes some good points about how to give and receive feedback. …show more content…

First type is positive feedback. This type of feedback we all love but too much positive feedback can cause us to become complacent with our work. Receiving this type of feedback is definitely encouraging to a worker and it stands out the most due to the fact of how well it made us feel. The next type is negative feedback, which to us means failure. We do not like how receiving negative feedback feels so we usually do not accept unfavorable information. There is also a tendency for the recipient to try to place blame on another individual, constant explanations as well as only fixing the behavior to avoid it in the future. Doing so may change the individual’s actions but if they have no guidance with it he or she may still not perform at a desired behavior. The last type of feedback is no feedback at all. The article states, that no response feedback at all is detrimental to the employee’s performance in the workplace (Sadri and Seto, 2011). There has to be some type of encouragement or motivation for them. The authors have a good rule to follow with feedback, “Since the purpose of feedback is to motivate and inform, we suggest that the ratio of positive to negative information that an individual receives is very important. Three positives followed by one negative is a good ratio” (Sadri and Seto, 2011, p.

Open Document