In their debate over the ratification of the Constitution, the Federalists and the Anti-federalists present an alternative regime perspective on what the Constitution and the American government is believed to be today. A criticism the Anti-federalists had of the Constitution was that it was too vague. For instance, in regards to the nature of power, the Anti-federalists argue that the central government’s limitless power is dangerous because it is susceptible to abuse. However, Publius argues that “in every political institution, a power to advance the public happiness, involves a discretion which may be misapplied and abused” (Federalist, 252). Publius makes the case that power and the nature of power open ended and it can be used for good or evil. The Federalists do not give explicit explanations for what they mean because meanings of words are expected to change constantly. The Federalists intended for the Constitution to be living and evolving, which is often over looked by people. When talking about the Constitution the first thing that comes to mind is the Bill of Rights, but what people are unaware of is that the Federalists did not think a b...
... middle of paper ...
...e “Talented Tenth” specifically (Dubois, 104). Similarly, Douglass states that there is “hope in the thought” and that there “are forces in operation, which must inevitably, work the down fall” of this unjust system (Douglass, 29, 38). On the other hand, Coates, unlike the others does not seem to be hopeful of change, or rather he is not hopeful that white Americans will wake up from their dream or quit feigning ignorance on this issue. There is only a “small chance of the Dreamers coming into consciousness” (Coates, 146).
As outsiders of the American polity, the Federalists and Anti-federalists, Tocqueville, and the black American intellectuals/statesmen reveal what is often unnoticed by people today. Their texts not only inform people what is not already evident in society, but they spur people to reevaluate the nature of the democratic society that they live in.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The government of the United States has many policies and procedures that we as citizens has to live by some more controversial than some; some policies and procedures has been questioned and some has been justified. I will state some questions about some of these policies and procedures and answer them accordingly. The first pertains to the federalists and the anti-federalists. Explain the differences between the federalists and Anti Federalist. Why did the anti-federalists want a bill of rights.... [tags: United States, Immigration to the United States]
1101 words (3.1 pages)
- Early on in our nation’s history there were two primary political parties that sought to gain the upper hand as it related to implementation of policy and building the government. The two parties were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Each party’s membership held prominent names of individuals who would help build our earliest policies and shape the constitution. The Federalists sought to build a strong central government. They were concerned over a perceived resistance from the first thirteen states to any changes that they wanted to implement.... [tags: United States Constitution, Federalism]
711 words (2 pages)
- Around the late 1780s, America realized that the government it was using did not work. The States were divided, not together since the Articles of Confederation only loosely bound them together. Each State had different foreign treaties, different laws, even different money. The Constitution was proposed, which would transform the states into a united nation with a single, republican government. Two parties arose who disagreed over whether it should be ratified or not; the federalists and the anti-federalists.... [tags: United States, U.S. state, Republic]
1206 words (3.4 pages)
- From the settling of English citizens to the New World in Jamestown, Virginia; or the settlement of pilgrims in Plymouth, Massachusetts; the Early American people endured battle, victory, hardship, and pressure for quick revival as a nation. They were an underdeveloped society who fought to claim land that was not rightfully theirs, and would become close to succumbing to foreign countries and one very close to them: Great Britain. Through steady and great defiance, the Early Americas developed a strong government, although facing several challenges during the establishment, that would soon withhold competent government officials and decisions that would enhance a new and stronger nation tha... [tags: United States, United States Constitution]
1551 words (4.4 pages)
- The texts of the Federalists and Anti-federalists, Tocqueville and black American statesmen/intellectuals provide alternative regime perspectives because they are all points of views from outside of the American polity. The Federalists and Anti-Federalists are the founders who present new meanings to the current understanding of the Constitution. Tocqueville is the alien who analyzes democracy in America, questioning the elements of democracy that make a good government. The black American intellectuals are luminal figures that comment on the social injustice of the world we live in.... [tags: United States, United States Constitution]
1197 words (3.4 pages)
- The Tenth Amendment was ratified along with the rest of the Bill of Rights on December 17th, 1791, as well, unlike most other amendments, it gave rights not only to the people, but also to the state governments. The Tenth Amendment was passed in order to delegate powers to the state governments and the people that the national government does not have, this amendment states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people” There was conflict over the Tenth Amendment, as well as with the Constitution and the rest of the Bill of Rights, which was between the two parties at that ti... [tags: United States Constitution]
1382 words (3.9 pages)
- “The Conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added (US Constitution, Preamble).”After the leaders of the United States wrote the Constitution, they had to get all thirteen states to agree to it. Some states didn 't want to agree unless they could add some specific rights for individual people. So in 1791 the United States added ten new rights to the Constitution.... [tags: United States Constitution]
1018 words (2.9 pages)
- When the United States declared itself a sovereign nation, the Articles of Confederation were drafted to serve as the nations first Constitution.Under these Articles, the states held most of the power; but due to an almost absent centralized government, colonists were ill-equipped to deal with such practices as regulating trade both between states and internationally, levying taxes, solving inter-state disputes, negotiating with foreign nations, and most importantly enforcing laws under the current notion of "Congress".... [tags: Early American History]
701 words (2 pages)
- The Constitution, when first introduced, set the stage for much controversy in the United States. The two major parties in this battle were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, such as James Madison, were in favor of ratifying the Constitution. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, such as Patrick Henry and Richard Henry Lee, were against ratification. Each party has their own beliefs on why or why not this document should or should not be passed. These beliefs are displayed in the following articles: Patrick Henry's "Virginia Should Reject the Constitution," Richard Henry Lee's "The Constitution Will Encourage Aristocracy," James Madison's "Federalist Paper No.... [tags: History Historical Politics Political Essays Comp]
1659 words (4.7 pages)
- Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists From 1787-1790 the development of the American Constitution was a battle between two opposing political philosophies. America’s best political minds gathered in Philadelphia and other cities in the Northeast in order to find common ground in a governmental structure. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists had both some political thoughts that agreed as well as some political thoughts that disagreed. However, both parties would compromise and ultimately come together.... [tags: essays research papers]
348 words (1 pages)