Peter Singers article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” is an article that starts off talking about the famine in East Bengal India. Written from his view of moral responsibility people should feel when situations of famine like that exist in the world. In this article, Singer uses two main thesis to argue his point of view. The first thesis is the way we respond to situations like the famine in Bengal, India can morally not be justified. The second thesis is the way of life we currently enjoy in our society needs to change. Along with his thesis Singer makes several assumptions, such as Suffering is bad and that if we have the power to change morally we should.
The way we respond to situations like the famine cannot be justified. “I begin with the assumption that suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad”. I agree completely with Singer in his moral belief that people should help others who have less than they do. In this, he argues “the way people in relatively affluent countries react to a situation like that in Bengal cannot be justified. I think if people looked at moral issues differently instead from a position of seeing someone like...
... middle of paper ...
...ulging in materialistic items. Although I would not go as far to say that you cannot enjoy luxury items as long as you are doing your part to better the world around you.
In conclusion Singer gave a compelling argument for how we morally are fundamentally different from where he believes we need to be. Although I believe in his general argument his views are sometimes a little extreme. His article is factual in that we could influence the world if we thought of helping others as a moral duty and not just charity. I believe it should be our duty to help one another and it should not matter if who or what you are helping is in your town or another country. However, I also believe that you can relish in life 's luxury offers at the same time without being morally wrong. Overall, we should be more obligated taking on more responsibility in helping others more than we do.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Peter Singer's paper “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”has made a drastic impact in modern applied ethics. The simple nature of the paper makes for an easy read, yet the point clearly set out by Singer is at ends with the targeted audiences' popular beliefs. Although most will object to Singer's idea by throwing away a basic principle of most moral theories, I wish to deny Singer's solution by showing that the ability to apply Singer's conclusion is not reasonable and does not address the problem's core.... [tags: on poverty and action]
1498 words (4.3 pages)
- This paper explores Peter Singer’s argument, in Famine, Affluence, and Morality, that we have morally required obligations to those in need. The explanation of his argument and conclusion, if accepted, would dictate changes to our lifestyle as well as our conceptions of duty and charity, and would be particularly demanding of the affluent. In response to the central case presented by Singer, John Kekes offers his version, which he labels the and points out some objections. Revisions of the principle provide some response to the objections, but raise additional problems.... [tags: morally required obligations to those in need]
1493 words (4.3 pages)
- Peter Singer is often regarded as one of the most productive and influential philosophers of modern times. He is well-known for his discussions of the acute social, economic, and political issues, including poverty and famines. In his “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, Singer (1972) discusses the problem of poverty and hunger, as well as the way this problem is treated in the developed world. Singer believes that charity is inseparable from morality, and no distinction can be drawn between charity and duty.... [tags: charity, philosophy, duty]
1102 words (3.1 pages)
- Peter Albert David Singer was born on the 6th of July 1946 in Melbourne Australia. Singer is an Australian moral philosopher. He is a utilitarianist that specializes in global issues and is an activist for animal rights. Best known for his book “Animal liberation” (1975) and his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” (1972) that is used in ethic classes all over the world. Peter Singer at this time is a Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University, and a Laureate Professor at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics at the University of Melbourne.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Philosophy of life, Aesthetics]
789 words (2.3 pages)
- “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer is trying to argue that “the way people in relatively affluent countries react to a situation… cannot be justified; indeed,… our moral conceptual scheme needs to be altered and with it, the way of life that has come to be taken for granted in our society”(Singer 230). Peter Singer provides striking examples to show the reader how realistic his arguments are. In this paper, I will briefly give a summary of Peter Singer’s argument and the assumptions that follow, adding personal opinions for or against Peter’s statements.... [tags: Peter Singer]
2018 words (5.8 pages)
- In Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence and Morality,” Singer makes three claims about moral duty; that avoidable suffering is bad, that it is our moral obligation to help others in need, and that we should help those in suffering regardless of their distance to us or if others are in the same position as we are to help. First, I will elaborate on Singer’s arguments for each of these positions. Next, I will discuss two objections to Singer’s position, one that he debates in his writings and another that I examine on my own, and Singer’s responses to those objections.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Duty, Philosophy of life]
1021 words (2.9 pages)
- Peter Singer states two principles on the effects of famine, affluence, and morality which he feels that everyone should abide by. The first argument made is that lack of food, shelter and medicine is bad and can lead to feeling pain and death. I for one, could agree on this assumption just by analyzing it carefully. We see Singer on his thesis elaborate the causes of famine within East Bengal in 1970s. As governments and individuals within the world see the massive flooding’s and mismanagement of food issuing one hopes that we all as a society could take action to help stop such suffering and act on a situation like the impaired damage that happened with East Bengal.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Human, Religion]
904 words (2.6 pages)
- ... Here lies the major difference between the two – a duty is something that must be done in order for the existence of society, whereas charity is voluntary and uncompelled. It is this distinction that Singer wishes to erase, or at least blur. He wants to make monetary help to the distant needy a dutiable action rather than charity on a moral level. In fact, Singer proposes that everyone who possesses a reasonable amount of resources must donate a significant portion of their wealth and assets, reducing their self to “the level of marginal utility” (Singer 32).... [tags: Peter Singer's article Famine]
1260 words (3.6 pages)
- In this essay I will be arguing why a utilitarian could possibly disagree with Peter Singers Argument presented in “Famine, Affluence and Morality.” After reading such an interesting paper I must say as much as I disagreed with Singers viewpoints I almost found it difficult to object them with support. From a utilitarian point of view we are to maximize Happiness by reducing suffering. How can Giving possible make someone unhappy. But as I was thinking a saying came across my mind, “Two steps forward one step back”.... [tags: utilitarian, philosophy, happiness]
939 words (2.7 pages)
- Peter Singer, the author of Famine, Affluence, and Morality is an Australian philosopher who wanted to end suffering and death. Not only is Singer a philosopher he is a utilitarianism defendant. Singer argues about people suffering from death, lack of food and shelter, and medical care is bad and how it can be prevented. He also, argues that we could help to prevent this from happening. Singer explains the issues that are going on in the world but, he particularly focuses on East Bengal because, “constant poverty, cyclone, and a civil war had turned at least nine million people into destitute refugees.” After he listed each way these issues could be prevented or not caused at all he then t... [tags: Poverty, Wealth, Utilitarianism, Food security]
735 words (2.1 pages)