What helped start the civil war was the death of Caesar 's daughter, Julia, in 54 BC. Julia was married to Pompey to help create a political alliance between him and Caesar, but when she died during childbirth, Caesar and Pompey’s relationship ended. After Julia’s death Caesar had gone off to effectively complete his conquest of Gaul , while Pompey became sole consul.
Caesar had been the conqueror of Gaul for eight years and had used this position to launch massive conquests, attaining wealth and prestige and making him as powerful as anyone in Rome. Caesar wanted to still be in control of his army until he had been elected to his new office, but his opponents in the senate wanted him to present himself as a private citizen in Rome before his election so they would be able prosecute him.Caesar well knew that he would
be helpless as a private citizen in the presence of the enemies who were seeking to destroy him. In December of 50 BC, Caesar wrote to the Senate agreeing to resign his military command if Pompey would do the same, but Pompey refused.
Caesar was attempting to hold onto his command until he could be elected consul. Caesar 's enemies didn 't want this, not only so they could prosecute him but so he wouldn 't have the ability to get another mili...
... middle of paper ...
...s Caesar was a very intelligent man, he was also very foolish and made mistakes that greatly affected the Roman Republic. Caesar started a civil war with his own brother in law out of his own stubbornness. He would rather go to war with the citizens he was
wanting to rule, rather than just giving up his armies and moving on with his life. Caesar also superiority complex, after becoming dictator he had his face put on the Roman currency, which is normally only done for someone who has passed away, so by him doing this it just seems like Caesar is sending out the message that he is here, and that he is in charge of of every and anything. Caesar made himself as much of a king as he possibly could in any way possible. Julius Caesar did not always do what would have been best for the Republic, he mostly put himself first and did whatever would benefit himself the most.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Fall of the Republic was more than a single man, but Julius Caesar was definitely to blame for being a large part of the destruction of the Roman Republic. Caesar was responsible for the fall of the Republic for several reasons, the the civil war from which the Republic never really recovered in January of 49 BC, Caesar 's appointment as dictator for life in 44 BC, and bringing into power the many of the men who would be important in the next set of civil wars. What helped start the civil war was the death of Caesar 's daughter, Julia, in 54 BC.... [tags: Julius Caesar, Roman Republic, Augustus]
1305 words (3.7 pages)
- How was it possible that under the dictatorship and after the deification of Julius Caesar the Roman republic fell, when it had been structurally sound for four centuries before. When the republic was established around the end of the 6th century B.C.E., the Romans made clear that they wished to avoid all semblance of the monarchy that had ruled for two centuries before. (T.J. Cornell, The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000-264 BC), London and New York: Routledge, 1995; p.... [tags: Fall of Roman Empire]
2913 words (8.3 pages)
- To what extent were the Marian reforms responsible for the fall of the Roman republic. During the last century of the Roman republic, the system of government was drastically changed and eventually fell apart, not only because of Marius and his military reforms, but also because of the dictatorship and proscriptions of Sulla, seven consulships of Marius, political alliances of the first and second triumvirates and the growing corruption and ineptitude of the senate. By allowing more people into the army, giving them a personal reason to join, and forcing them to grow stronger, Marius made the military considerably more effective, which naturally lead to the swift gaining of territory and the... [tags: Julius Caesar, Roman Republic, Roman Empire]
1878 words (5.4 pages)
- Much ink from the historians’ pens has been spilled seeking to explain the reasons behind the fall of the Roman Republic. As Gruen notes, “from Montesquieu to Mommsen, from Thomas Arnold to Eduard Meyer…the Republic’s calamity has summoned forth speculation on a grand scale. How had it come about?” (1) Certainly, from one perspective, it can be said that the attraction of this event is to a degree overstated: it is based on the belief of the stability of political systems, of the deterrence of the possibility of radical changes in political worldviews and general social arrangements and structures.... [tags: Empire, Anarchy, Collapse]
948 words (2.7 pages)
- The fall of the Roman Republic was an event that forever changed the face of the Roman world. It ushered in a new age of dictatorship. Men like Cicero did not want people such as Caesar to become dictators. His letters record the events of the day and his opinions of what was happening, and his thoughts on the events of that era. Cicero felt that the Republic fell because of Caesar’s lust for power, and it was his obligation as a Roman to do his best to challenge his ideas on changing the Republic into dictatorship.... [tags: Roman Empire, Julius Caesar, Augustus]
1817 words (5.2 pages)
- The Weimar Republic would have continued to be a functional government far longer than achieved if not for the defeat of WWI, the economic burdens imposed by the Versailles Treaty, and the flawed Article 48 which all contributed to the down fall of Germany’s first attempt at a legitimate Democracy. This paper will argue that the societal, economical, and constitutional aspects all played a role in the hopeless Democracy Germany attempted which ultimately lead Germany into a totalitarian state that would further shake the world with the rise of the NSDAP and Adolf Hitler.... [tags: World History ]
1406 words (4 pages)
- Events which stretch as far back as the reforms of the Gracchi brothers’ meant that the Rome was facing a Republic that was already deteriorating before Pompey had stepped into power. While Pompey’s quest for power was harmful, many other factors were also baleful to the Republic, and were hence instrumental in its decline. Gnaeus Pompeius’s measures to gain power were harmful because it was primarily a paradox to the principles of being part of a Republic with all its notions of shared and short power.... [tags: Roman History Essays]
790 words (2.3 pages)
- The Roman Republic ultimately failed due to the lack of large-scale wars and other crises that had united the Roman populous early in the history of the Roman Republic. Roman leadership and honor became compromised. In the absence of war and crisis, Rome’s leaders failed to develop the honor and leadership necessary to maintain the Republic. The Roman Republic was founded in 509 BC after the ruling Tarquins abused their extensive power as monarchs and were overthrown. The goal of the Roman Republic was to have a strong government, governed equally by the patricians and the plebians, and to avoid another Roman Monarchy.... [tags: war, crisis, leadership, honor, Rome]
878 words (2.5 pages)
- The roman republic came into existence at the termination of the Roman kingship in 507 B.C.E. The last king of Rome, Tarquin the Proud, was expelled by Collatinus and Brutus, as a result of his arrogance involving the matter of one of his relations raping the wholesome Roman matron Lucretia and her subsequent suicide. The rape of Lucretia was really a representation of the frustration that the roman citizens felt regarding the kingship. The later kings had little regard for roman values and the roman populus, which they used as something of a slave labor force.... [tags: European History]
521 words (1.5 pages)
- The Second Republic and Its Fall One of many hurdles that Nigeria had to overcome in the attempt to return to civilian rule, and then to have such a new system entrenched, was the fact that competitive politics encouraged recourse to sectional identification. On the one hand, there is need for a understanding of the nature of the dynamics of Nigerian society, especially with regard to the phenomenon of ethnicity. On the other hand, the theoretical formulations which already exist concerning the nature of politics in segmented societies must be confronted so that a closer approximation between such themes and the sociopolitical realities of Nigeria can be achieved (Joseph, 1987:43).... [tags: Nigeria Federal Government Military Essays]
3792 words (10.8 pages)