Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
personal cultural identity
personal cultural identity
how to think about cultural identity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: personal cultural identity
“We see things not as they are but as we are.” Discuss this claim in relation to at least two ways of knowing.
“We see things not as they are but as we are.”
This statement can be interpreted in different ways, but the way I interpret it is that opinions and perspectives vary from person to person, due to the variety of personal factors that make up their identity. These factors can include personality, age, culture, race, life experiences, interests, career, and countless others. There are two ways of looking at this statement, literally and figuratively. In the literal sense, I will explore what factors cause differences in vision in people. In the figurative sense, I will discuss what factors play a role in differences of opinion and perspective in people.
In order to start discussing this statement, we must first define it. We are going to define “things” as objects, people, issues, and situations in the world around us. We are going to define “see” both in the sense of visually seeing with your eyes, and looking at issues from a different mental perspective.
You can think of this statement in a literal sense, where we define the word “see” as what someone physically sees with their eyes. This statement is true in that sense, in situations such as in that of a colorblind person, or a blind person. From a medical point of view, people having visual problems can be a result from illnesses or diseases such as glaucoma, optic neuritis, Ischemic optic neuropathy, or lobe tumors (1). These visual problems affect a person’s ability to gain knowledge through sense perception.
According to Plato, all of our knowledge is based upon perceptual experiences, such as seeing or hearing. Sense perception is a way of...
... middle of paper ...
...tive and their perspective are at all similar? I believe that our perspective is our reality, and our reality comes from what we experience.
The human mind is a complex matter and there are countless processes and activities that go on in our brains. To my knowledge, and through my life experience, I can say that reason, emotion, and past experiences are the majority of what determines my perspectives and opinions. Others may disagree with what I believe, but that is because they have a different perspective than me, because they have a different life than me. Thus, they have proven my point.
Word Count:
1550 (text only)
1613 including title and bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
(1) http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/sym/vision_changes.htm Site Accessed on Jan 23rd 2010.
(2) http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/01/060118205940.htm Site Accessed Feb 3rd 2010
In Seeing, Annie Dillard writes about the things people do not see, and the things people choose to see. Dillard does this to make the reader aware of what is around them. People have the attitude of “what you see is what you get.” (Dillard pg. 13) Dillard believes that people do not actually want to see what is really there. That people only want to see what makes them happy. Dillard goes on to discuss all the things we see and do not see, ending by stating “if we are blinded by darkness, we are also blinded by light”. (Dillard Pg.17) Dillard is saying that if you look hard enough there is always something to see.
ABSTRACT: The aim of this paper is to defend a broad concept of visual perception, according to which it is a sufficient condition for visual perception that subjects receive visual information in a way which enables them to give reliably correct answers about the objects presented to them. According to this view, blindsight, non-epistemic seeing, and conscious visual experience count as proper types of visual perception. This leads to two consequences concerning the role of the phenomenal qualities of visual experiences. First, phenomenal qualities are not necessary in order to see something, because in the case of blindsight, subjects can see objects without experiences phenomenal qualities. Second, they cannot be intentional properties, since they are not essential properties of visual experiences, and because the content of visual experiences cannot be constituted by contingent properties.
If we only know a little about the object, we should not immediately distrust what we do not know of
The 'doctrine of recollection' states that all true knowledge exists implicitly within us, and can be brought to consciousness - made explicit - by recollection. Using the Platonic concepts of 'Forms', 'particulars', 'knowledge' and 'true opinion', this essay explains what can or cannot be recollected, why all knowledge is based on recollection, and why the doctrine does not prove the soul to be immortal.
...he physical world, and believing that knowledge comes from what is seen and heard can confuse what reality is perceived as. Plato’s “The Allegory of the Cave” and Salvador Dali’s painting “The Persistence of Memory” show us how realities can be confusing and turn out to be something different. However, each and every one has a reality of his or her, to which they believe is true. If so, hopefully that reality is rational.
Everyone has a different perception than another, such a different perception that should be taken into account by other people. Whether people are blind or crazy, some people of this world are impaired so their lives are limited. The unknown can be very mind-boggling to these impaired people. Though at the same time there is a strong possibility that there are also even more unknown things to unimpaired people. Plato’s “The Allegory of the Cave” and “Seeing” by Annie Dillard suggest that knowledge and reality are both a matter of perception based on experiences; and as such, great care should be taken by anyone who attempts to redefine the perceptions of another.
“Everything we see hides another thing, we always want to see what is hidden by what we see. There is an interest in that which is hidden and which the visible does not show us. This interest can take form of a quite intense feeling, a sort of conflict, one might say, between the visible that is hidden and the visible that is present.” (Magritte)
“ To believe only in what you can see seems a peculiar form of blindness ( Wolpe
...se which…belong exclusively to the mind…things are sensed through understanding, understood through senses (Montaigne 414)”.
Perception plays a huge role in someone’s life. “When a distinction is made between sensation and perception, sensation is frequently identified as involving simple “elementary” processes that occur right at the beginning of a sensory system, as when light stimulates receptors in the eye. In contrast, perception is identified with complicated processes that involves higher-order mechanisms such as understanding and memory that involve activity in the brain” (Goldstein, 1980, p. 7). It is simply the ability to see, hear, or become aware of something through the five senses. Perception aids us to navigate through the world, avoid danger, make decisions, and prepare for action.
Appearance is what we perceive around us; it is sometimes known as the empirical, which means known through the senses. Reality is most commonly defined as all that exists regardless of whether it is perceived or not; in other words, it exists independently of anyone’s perception.The metaphysical problem of reality and appearance can be described as the difficulty of telling the objective from the subjective. One of the proboems of reality and appearance has already been illustrated by Plato, which is that reality is genuine as opposed to deceptive. He suggests a rationalist approach to answering this question relying on reasons that focused on our senses. Our sensory knowlege and experiences are our only perceptions of reality, but that can still mean that its not really there. All that us humans have are our own paradigms of what reality “really is” which is based upon a series of assumptions and beleifes that in turn, determines their views of reality.
Each one of us lives in our own unique world of perception. As individuals, we may experience life in an entirely different way through our senses and life experiences. Therefore, perception can be tricky since it is very personal to each one of us. According to the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, perception has three meanings; (1) “the way you think about or understand someone or something,” (2) “the ability to understand or notice something easily,” and, (3) “the way that you notice or understand something using one of your senses” (2014, para. 1). C.S. Lewis said, “What you see and what you hear depends a great deal on where you are standing. It also depends on what sort of person you are” (n.d., para. 11). In other words,
As human beings, our perception and viewpoints of the world are inclined to change as we develop as a society.We are easily influenced by each other, and learn to adapt to our surroundings
Perception is defined as the awareness of the world through the use of the five senses, but the concept of perception is often used to isolate one person’s point of view, so how reliable can perception be if no one person’s is exactly the same? The word perception itself is riddled with different, well, perceptions of its meaning. When some hear the word they might automatically think of it as something innately flawed, that can easily be fooled by illusions, while others may think of its usefulness when avoiding scalding a hand on a hot stove. I am here to agree with both and to argue that perception is something necessary and helpful, and something that should be scrutinized for its flaws. By looking at perception as a way of knowing in the
How do we obtain our knowledge? Do we use our senses of touch, taste, hearing, smell and sight? This is a basic philosophical question that has been asked and elaborated upon by philosophers. Plato and Aristotle have formed their own opinions upon whether or not the senses can be trusted. In order to understand their ideas on the senses, first their philosophy on the connection between the soul and body must be examined. Plato states that the body and soul are separate, while Aristotle says they are one. Concerning the senses, Plato says they cannot be trusted and knowledge cannot be gained through them. Aristotle creates an opposing view, saying that the senses are essential to gaining knowledge and learning about the world.