Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: character of claudius
In this essay we are going to discuss whether Claudius was an effective ruler. In order to achieve an answer to this, we will also discuss how he governed his empire and how he went about administrating laws and provinces.
To start with, however, it is best to briefly introduce Claudius before he became emperor. This will help us to understnad his situation and how past events effected his ruling.
Claudius was the great nephew of Augustus, and so was part of the most important family in rome at the time. From a young age Claudius was physically and mentally challenged, and due to this he was the out cast of his family, everyone including Augustus believed him to be an embaressment. Augustus also done him no favours, he didn’t give him any ‘honours except a seat in the college of augurs and listed him in his will among heirs in the third degree.’ Claudius was then forced to socialise with slaves and freedmen, which is unusual because of his status within the family. Claudius was also unable to enter a career as a political magistrate, firstly because he was unable to perform the required ten years of military service due to his incapabilities. However, Claudius eventually, and unexpectedly, became emperor after his nephew and previous emperor, Gaius, was assassinated. Claudius was taken straight to the Praetorian barracks and was proclaimed emperor.
So, now we see how Claudius lived his life before and also how he unexpectedly took the role of emperor. Now, in order to discuss whether Claudius was a successful emperor, it is best to follw on from what was mentioned earlier. Claudius, from a young age, socialised with freedmen and slaves, both of these being the lowest socially ranked people in rome. Once Claudius...
... middle of paper ...
...lso, it seems, unable to make the distinction between his authority and the senates, and he began to encroach on the senates authority quite often. Claudius would one minute attempt to please the senate, for example, he gave the senate back the provinces of Macedonia and Achaia, and then anger the senate with his administrative laws, and he simple minded attacks on senators themselves. Claudius’ reign was full of misconceived tasks in his aim to make an impact, but rather he angered senatrors and equites with his simple mindedness, and attacks on their established way of life.
Finally, If we weigh up Claudius’ successes and failures, we see that he was an effective emperor, the good and effective things that he done for his people and his military success, out weigh his failure with the senate and the upper class, which in all fairness, didn’t hinder his ruling.
Claudius’s Decision to Invade Britain in AD43 as Motivated by a Desire to Emulate Julius Caesar
Claudius was a significant ruler of the early Roman imperial era. He reigned from AD 41-54. He was easily influenced by those with questionable agendas, such as his last two wives and his freedmen, yet his principate was deemed successful. His expansion of the empire, his new reforms and his control over the senate were all beneficial to the state and and his rule was one which paved the way for those who ruled after him.
In conclusion, Augustus has written his personal account and presented himself as popular and successful leader. He did many things that helped society as well as did many things that did nothing long term. Augustus may have done things for only the betterment of himself but they did pay off when it all came to an
Although playing what’s thought to represent a noble king, Claudius totally differs from that title. Claudius is a manipulative, under minding, selfish person: “That we wish wisest sorrow think on him,/ Together with remembrance of ourselves,/ Therefore our sometime sister, now our queen” (1.2.6-8). King Claudius kills the king of Denmark his own brother just to turn into the king of
...ion this all showed that style of governing and ruling an empire started a century long pattern of events that eventually lead to the fall and destruction of the old oligarchy led by the Senate. The combination of desire for personal gain and glory of a politician or general was what weakened the Roman customs and the Senate. This was a cycle among the Senate, to find themselves stuck in a problem and to find others to fix with of course military means but in turn make everything more corrupt with their disruptive practices such as Pompey and Julius Caesar. But they were not the only ones there were others who were to blame for causing such decay and corruption such as Marius, Sulla, Gaius and Tiberius Gracchus. They were the ones who kept this corruption cycle going and it was Augustus Caesar who finally broke the cycle and brought stability and order back to Rome.
when in fact, he despises him and wishes death upon him. Claudius is not the
In the early first century AD, the Roman Empire was subject to autocratic rule and the old Republic was long dead. Augustus had been ruling for forty years and most of that time he was loved and praised by the Senate and the people of Rome. Throughout his reign, Augustus had the one lingering problem of finding a successor to take over the role of Emperor. He had chosen 3 different heirs in his time of rule; however, they all passed before they had the chance to inherit Augustus’ esteemed power. His fourth choice, Tiberius, was the one to succeed Augustus. He was often referred to, by Augustus, as an outstanding general and the only one capable of defending Rome against her enemies. The statement, ‘Tiberius is condemned by many ancient historians (including Tacitus), and his reign is often portrayed as being detrimental to the welfare of the Roman Empire’ is invalid as he treated the senate fairly, created strong economics and security in the state and boosted the empire into an unprecedented state of prosperity. This hypothesis will be proven through this essay by analyzing factors such as Tiberius’ administration of the Empire, his relationship with the senate, his financial control, the effect of Sejanus over his rule and why were his last years as Emperor referred to as a ‘reign of terror’ by Tacitus.
Emperor Nero, infamously known as one of the most malevolent, oppressive, and tyrannical leader throughout history, was the last ruler of the Julio-Claudian Dynasty. He was born outside Rome in Antium and his mother married his great uncle, Emperor Claudius, in order for her son to be the next Emperor of Rome. It wasn’t apparent that her son was to become one of the most feared and cruel leaders in Roman history from 54 CE to 68 CE. By examining his achievements and failures as an emperor, his influences and changes over the entire economic, political and social spectrum are revealed.
Claudius is also a character who is neither true to himself nor to others: he is not being true to the rest of the kingdom. He does not want to give up his gains, so the people of Denmark do not know why their previous King has died and his brother taken over. While making an attempt to pray, he realizes that his sins cannot be forgiven.
Claudius was even punished after death. His throne and whole castle was taken over by Fortinbras. Not only where his wife and friend dead, but he later died himself by his brother's son. Claudius killed and his turn to die came, but it took some time and other people to die too.
Delving into the character of King Claudius in Shakespeare’s tragedy, Hamlet, we find a character who is not totally evil but rather a blend of morally good and bad elements. Let’s explore the various dimensions of this many-sided character.
Firstly, the new King of Denmark, Claudius displays the sympathy for the dead King of Denmark, his brother’s death.
...ns his messengers they had “no further personal power to business with the King” than his articles allowed (1.2). This limitation reveals Claudius’ rigid authoritativeness. Thus, Claudius’ flamboyant use of language and his diplomatic foreign policy reveal his strong leadership qualities.
Claudius is a villain because of his enormous greed, his overwhelming selfishness and his use of intelligence for evil purposes.
King Claudius, as illustrated in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, displays both charm and eloquence. Claudius is an intelligent person and is able to deceive people into believing he is innocent and morally guided. He is adept at manipulating people in order to advance and maintain his own power and fails to show any remorse for his actions. Claudius utilizes his linguistic skills to portray himself as an innocent and prudent leader; however, upon further inspection his diction is a mere smoke screen that hides his manipulative and cunning nature.