Exploring the Boundaries between Alternative Medicine and Biomedicine

2708 Words6 Pages

Alternative medicine has been considered the “hidden mainstream” of patient care in America. As biomedicine increased in popularity, alternative methods of healing arose as a response to the treatments used by physicians. Historically, alternative (or “complementary”) medicine conveyed itself by highlighting its “natural” attributes. These characteristics attracted those who were wary of the chemicals used in allopathic medicines. Much of the skepticism that has accompanied complementary alternative medicine (CAM) stems from the lack of scientifically-based evidence that shows its efficacy; there is no “alternative” medicine there is simply “unproven” medicine (Fontanarosa and Lundberg 1618). This argument suggests that medicine and healing are inherently scientific and avoids the cultural and spiritual aspects of the healing process. However, alternative medicine has been increasingly incorporated into biomedical practice and more research initiatives are working towards demonstrating its efficacy. An important advancement has been the relationship between allopathic physicians and alternative medicine. Throughout alternative medicine’s history, there have been some physicians who promoted “alternative” treatments. This campaign may have led to further acceptance and use of CAM. In this essay, I will explore the boundaries between alternative medicine and biomedicine, describe the involvement of physicians in alternative practices, and shed some light on the tensions that surround this relationship.
The nineteenth century served as the basis for many types of alternative medicine that have developed into practices still being used in contemporary times. Many of these original alternative practices have involved physicians in two ...

... middle of paper ...

...t claims his or her health is improving. This tension has been decreasing as more physicians are being exposed to the idea of alternative treatments that are being used complementary to allopathic prescriptions (Kaptchuk and Eisenberg 201). The discussion of such models continues to occur. The increasing acceptance of CAM by physicians shows that as doctors are more involved with alternative practices, and keep their patients’ interests in mind, tensions against alternative medicines can be resolved. The boundary between alternative and conventional is not always defined; it is flexible and has been increasingly more malleable as time progresses and more light is shed on alternative practices. Fontanorosa and Lundberg are correct in implying that all these forms of treatment are indeed medicine, but scientific boundaries cannot encompass the realm of the alternative.

More about Exploring the Boundaries between Alternative Medicine and Biomedicine

Open Document