The variation in the way humans perceive things is part of the intricacy of mankind. What is thought of as evil to one person can be viewed as good to another. The struggle between good and evil is a major theme in William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, when a group of innocent boys, stranded on an island, try to build a civilization from scratch. The question is: while their actions were wrong, are the boys themselves evil for committing them? The boys in Lord of the Flies were not evil, but rather driven by their fear and struggle for survival to become savages, and were inhibited by their instincts to put their survival before their morals.
Animals and men alike kill when in need. When backed into a corner, they will attack, and when they are hungry they will hunt. For example, when Ralph is being hunted by Jack’s “tribe”, he slaughters some of the other boys in order to preserve himself. As the book progresses, the boys slowly revert to their instincts and become more animal-like. When the boys believe Simon is the beast during their feast, they “leapt on to the beast, screamed, struck, bit, tore. There were no words, and no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws” (153). Golding’s description of this scene leads the reader to believe that the boys took up barbaric behavior and leaves them quite disturbed. No civilized being would ever tear with teeth and claws in such a situation. The boys all saw themselves in danger, and eliminated the threat (their perceptions of the beast). Instincts in situations like these are unconscious actions, and therefore do not make a person “good” or “evil”. Only someone’s morals can define them like this, and they do not apply to actions in a life-or-death situation.
The ideas of ...
... middle of paper ...
...e ideas were quickly shed, and nothing was accomplished. This is because there is no firm authority on the island. When society is created, so are its rules of acceptance. As the society develops and changes, so do their values, and their views on what is “right” and “wrong”.
No one can be exclusively good or evil. Rather, their natural instinct drives them to do deeds that are then considered by society as either good or evil, and only premeditated situations should be used to judge someone’s character. As each person in that society is an individual, the opinions will vary somewhat. Those boys were affected by the horrible, disgusting things and feelings they experienced on that island. That, combined with their instinct, drove them to commit their “crimes”. None of the inhabitants on that island were evil. They just did what they needed to do to get off alive.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- William Golding’s novel “The Lord of the Flies” is an exploration into the idea of the savage natural instinct of human evil. It is suggested that Golding’s novel is partly based upon his real life experiences with the violence and brutality of World War II. The novel defines the struggle within all humans to differentiate between the learned civilized instinct and the human savage instinct. The civilized instinct is the impulse to obey rules, behave morally, and act lawfully. The savage instinct is the impulse to seek brute power over others, act selfishly, forget morals, and indulge in violence.... [tags: savage, instinct,, civilized]
609 words (1.7 pages)
- No Clear Hero in Lord of the Flies The idea of a hero is a complicated one and there are several possible interpretations in Lord of the Flies. In action films the hero is usually the 'good guy' even if he (or she) is quite violent. Action heroes are strong and tough and think quickly when there is a problem. In novels the hero can simply be the main character of the story, though usually we feel some sympathy for him or her as well. Sometimes the hero is someone quite unexpected, who manages to do or say things that earn our respect and admiration.... [tags: Lord of the Flies Essays]
826 words (2.4 pages)
- How Golding Presents the Decline from Civilisation to Savagery in Lord of the Flies Lord of the Flies is the name given to the inner beast, to which only Simon ever actually speaks. As Simon's waits for the beast's arrival near the bloody sow's head on the stake (buzzing with flies), The Lord of the Flies speaks to him, warning him not to get in its way or else he shall be killed by the boys. The Lord of the Flies name comes from the sow's head and the countless flies buzzing about it, which soon move from the sow's head to swarm around the head of Simon as the Lord of the Flies tells him, "I'm a part of you." In biblical texts, the Lord of the Flies is the title of Beelzebub (a direct tran... [tags: Lord of the Flies William Golding Essays]
2830 words (8.1 pages)
- Darkness has always existed within humanity suppressed under rules and order, but when restraints are broken, the capacity for humans to do evil is unleashed. Novelist William Golding’s allegory Lord of the Flies is about a group of British boys’ descent from civilization to savagery on an uninhabited island after their plane crash. Lord of the Flies delivers the aspects of dystopian society in a subtle show-not-tell manner. The construction of society and exploration of human nature is unfolded through foil and symbolism, but the story is not without its shortcomings.... [tags: Human, English-language films, Civilization]
1038 words (3 pages)
- ... Minutes later, the fire is monstrous and consumes a nearby tree that spreads to a large portion of the island. Piggy chastises the group for so hastily and childishly rushing to build a fire, barely even heeding the rest of Ralph's instruction. Piggy then points out that a little boy is now missing as the fire is spreading. Everyone is silent, struck with shame, but they ultimately pretend nothing has happened and remain still. The mountain, that pink pillar of innocence and purity, has now caused destruction, and even further, beginning the violent and gradual downturn of the civilized nature of these English boys.... [tags: the nature of man]
1954 words (5.6 pages)
- Heart of Darkness and Lord of the Flies Seldom are works as brilliantly written as Conrad's Heart of Darkness or Golding's Lord of the Flies. There are effective comparisons and contrasts between the two novels. The novels deal with many similar issues and contain many of the same themes. Many of the themes present in Heart of Darkness and also present in Lord of the Flies. Both novels deal with the theme of civilization versus savagery. Also, both novels imply that every man has a heart of darkness or an evil that is usually drowned out by the light of civilization.... [tags: comparison compare contrast essays]
611 words (1.7 pages)
- Look closely at the beginning and end of chapter nine. What is the importance of the character of Simon here and in the rest of the novel. Lord of the Flies, written in 1954 by William Golding, is a symbolic microcosm of the world Golding knew and participated in. The island and the boys represent Golding’s view of the world and humankind in general. It is an examination of the definition of society, man’s inclination for evil and destruction and the inevitable result of anarchy and chaos. It is an exploration of the break down of society in the absence of rules and regulations.... [tags: English Literature]
1114 words (3.2 pages)
- In both novels, the main characters are isolated from any form of true civilisation. In Lord of the Flies, the boys find themselves on a desolate island which is devoid of any human life due to a plane crash, whereas in The Road the Man and Boy live in a bleak, destroyed America in which almost the entire population has been wiped out due to an unnamed natural disaster. Because of the lack of resources and essentials, it is inevitable that the main characters have to find means of surviving – in Lord of the Flies; this is mainly through hunting and building shelter and in The Road, the Man and the Boy trek along the barren landscape in search for any remaining food they can find.... [tags: Book Analysis, Survival of the Fittest]
1725 words (4.9 pages)
- Lord of the Flies by William Golding Coursework "We've got to have rules and obey them. After all we're not savages." This essay is about the above statement which was said by Jack in chapter 2. The essay is going to be about Jack's character, the move to savagery and how William Golding presents this book to us. The statement does not really portray the real character of Jack because throughout the first few chapters Jack is described to be the one who likes savagery, violence and power.... [tags: Papers]
822 words (2.3 pages)
- ... . maybe it’s only us” (Golding, 96) although he fails in conduct this piece of information to the group: “Simon became inarticulate in his effort to express mankind’s essential illness.” (Golding, 96) In a clear opposition to Ralph and Simon we find the characters of Jack and Roger. Jack is the nemesis of Ralph. He represents impulse towards savagery and the corruption of an uncontrolled world. As David Wilson indicates, Ralph’s name derives from the old English word for “Wolf Council” (98) and creating a parallelism with this fact, Jack may be representing Hobbes premise that delivers judgment by asserting that “man is a wolf to man”.... [tags: raph´s goodness, religious fiction, law ]
1082 words (3.1 pages)