Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effectiveness of ESL lessons on vocabulary improvement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The study conducted by Yuksel and Tanriverdi in 2009 had one main purpose. The aim of the study was to determine the effects of watching an English captioned video clip on University level students who were learning English as a foreign language. More specifically the study wanted to investigate “how English language material with or without English language captions would affect vocabulary development of the foreign language learners in a Turkish university setting”.
Sample
There were 120 students who participated in this study, all of whom attended Kocaeli University in Turkey. Before starting their undergraduate degree, the participants took 20 hours of English courses a week and attended 80% of the classes. The participants had a wide variety of majors, some including Finance, Business Administration, Education, or Journalism. All of the participants were recent high school graduates and were at similar English proficiency levels (Intermediate). This was determined by a proficiency test that tested on reading comprehension, vocabulary, grammar, and writing. The participants were randomly assigned to the captions or no-captions groups. During the study 14 of the students failed to take one of the tests or the treatment therefore their results were removed from the study. The study was conducted with 104 participants; 53 students in the captions group and 51 students in the no-captions group.
Methods and Procedures
The study was measured using a pre-test, a post-test, and a control group. The students were randomly split into two groups. The participants in Group A watched the movie clip with captions, while Group B watched the movie clip without captions. Each group was given the same pre and post test (Vocabulary Knowl...
... middle of paper ...
...s answer was inaccurate they were marked down a level.
Results and Discussion
The study conducted by Yuksel and Tanriverdi found that while both groups A and B improved from pretest to posttest, the students in Group A preformed better. The students in Group A improved on an average of .91221 from pretest to posttest. The students in Group B did not perform as well, improving on average of .82168 from pretest to posttest. While Group A tested slightly better than Group B the t-test results found no statistical significant difference between the two groups.
Before the test began the participants initial knowledge of the ten target words was similar at slightly below Level II on the Vocabulary Knowledge Scale. After watching the Seinfeld clip twice both group A and B improved to above Level II. The posttest average for Group A was 2.7679 and Group B was 2.5650.
Another confound that may impact the results of this study could be the testing effect. Repeated testing may lead to better or worse performance. Changes in performance on the test may be due to prior experience with the test and not to the independent variable. In addition, repeated testing fatigues the subjects, and their performance declines as a result (Jackson, 2012). Because the professor is interested in determining if the implementation of weekly quizzes would improve test scores, an experimenter and/or an instrumentation effect may also affect results.
Dillon, Naomi. “LANGUAGE TEST. (cover story).” American School Board Journal 192.8 (2005): 10. MasterFILE Premier. EBSCO. Web. 18 Feb. 2001.
All students begin school with different levels of literacy development; English-speaking natives have obtained oral language proficiency in English which helps t...
... objective in nature, thus producing accurate data. Nevertheless, Allington and McGill-Frazon established that “reduction of a complex phenomenon to a few quantifiable variables can lead to over simplification of the phenomenon” (p.445). In other words, for observations to be complete, a combination of qualitative and quantitative data is necessitated in order to explain the totality of the phenomenon. An advantage of pre-test and post-tests designs is that it can be conducted with a single group or a control group. In the projected research topic, a pre-test and post-test was used with a group to maximize the internal validity. Neverthess, in the projected research topic, the experimental design is used to illustrate a cause and effect between two variables. The disadvantage is that external elements pose a threat to accuracy (Leedy & Ormrod, 2010, p.230).
Past analysis have shown that word learning gains were only stronger for English only students that despite summer loss in the treatment and control groups the program still had an effect. The quasi-experimental study showed small but significant effects (Lawrence, Crossen, Pare-Blagoev, & Snow, 2015). Within this study 28 schools were part of the randomized trail. Treatment was specified as participating in the word generation program. Again, we see in this particular study that the school itself was randomized in the treatment group rather than than the classrooms within schools. Note this is not a concern, but just a limitation. The effect sizes were as followed; Math d=1.13, Science d=.47, Social Studies d=.38, English d=.44, averaged together with an overall effect size of d=.62 (Lawrence et al., 2015). The main concern here is within the effect size for English which is the specific area they are testing with the Word Generation program and it is reported with an effect size of d=.44. Looking at the difference of means between the pre-test and the post-test vocabulary was reported having an average pre test of 18.57 and an average post test of 19.89, the difference is .71 (Lawrence et al., 2015). The effect size calculated from raw scores is .17. Traditionally in psychological research we would like to effect sizes ranging from .20=small, .50=medium, and .80=large (Cohen, 1992). According to Lipsey (1998)
The expectation that a bad student in a public school will turn into a good student in a private school is not only absurd, it is yet another slap in the face of public school teachers. The presumption is that private school teachers are more effective than public school teachers. The expectation of improved scores is completely unrealistic. It's not that simple.
English is an important and required course to take in any level of education. In the past, we all have taken various English courses that have helped us enhance our reading and writing skills. Over the couple of years I have been here at the University of Cincinnati, I have taken English composition classes, which have helped me evolve as a writer. However, after taking this course, my reading and writer skills have enhanced tremendously. With the goals and outcomes set for the class, that allowed students to gain an indication of the level of reading and writing skills will be accomplished. The outcomes entailed knowledge in critical thinking, rhetoric analysis, conventions, electronic environments, and cognitive analysis. In order to determine
During baseline, the student attempted to solve four word problems, resulting in two word problems solved correctly and two word problems solved incorrectly. The student applied one step out of five possible steps when solving. Word problem sessions (1-4) for the baseline are as follows: 0%, 0%, 20%, and 20%. The baseline data showed a range of 0% to 20% with a median of 10%.
Throughout my childhood, the idea of having a college education was greatly stressed. As a result, it was my duty as the next generational child, to excel in my studies and achieve a life of prosperity and success. Learning became the basic foundation of my growth. Therefore, my youth was overtaken by many hours spent reading and writing what was known to be correct "Standard" English. I first found this to be a great shortcoming, but as I grew older, I began to realize the many rewards acquired by having the ability to be literate.
This research was prepared by Rashid Ahli for the English Language subject, taught by Mr.Abass Abdulsamad.
The purpose of this assignment is to explain the impact of English language learners in the classroom. As a foreign student, English language learner in the United States faces multiple challenges for achieving academic success. To successfully complete a task, they need to master both English as a language and how it is used in core content classes especially when they are an adult. When trying to assist in instructing English language learners, they usually have many concepts and language abilities that they need to master, as do the teachers that are trying to teach them. With the incorporation of the concepts and approaches to identify and assess the issues and concerns that we have learned in our classroom instruction, such as lesson preparation,
Context before group (Condition 1, 2, 3) had a higher mean value (p < 0.05) than Context after group (Conditions 4, 5, 6). While re-reading as a technique has more correctly recalled sentences rather than re-typing (p<0.05). All the other comparisons between conditions were insignificant.
Doerksen & Shimamura (2001) conducted three experiments to test this. For all experiments, they used 24 undergraduates from University of California, Berkeley. In the first experiment, 164 words were produced, 64 neutral and 64 emotional. Participants silently watched the randomised words on the monitor, which were shown for two seconds each for five minutes. The words were also either in yellow or blue. After this, participants then wrote down as many of the words they could recall. Following this, the words were then shown in black, and the participants had to determine which of the words were in yellow, blue or was a new word. Experiment two was conducted similarly, except the words were shown in black with a white background, which had a yellow or blue border. A third experiment was then conducted, similar to the second experiment except the emotional words were replaced with categorical words. From conducting these experiments, Doerksen & Shimamura (2001) got similar results for all three
The problem to be investigated is whether the students are increasing their vocabulary through the current methods used in the classroom. Students’ vocabulary knowledge will be assessed through expressive knowledge of current vocabulary words. Those results will be compared to standardized vocabulary measures to determine the relationship to overall vocabulary ability. The following questions will be explored:
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Myford, C. (2011). The relationship between raters' prior language study