Modernism And Existentialism

1741 Words4 Pages

Regarded as the bridge of modernism and post-modernism in western modern philosophy, existentialism tends to explore the value of people’s being and power of people’s irrational strengths in creating value in the meaningless life. Including theism existentialism, atheism existentialism, and humanism existentialism, existentialism considers that life is meaningless, which is constructed by nothingness. In the meantime, claiming that human’s irrational initiative can create meaning and values in the meaningless life, existentialism substantially takes isolated irrational consciousness activities as the most real being in the world. In fact, being, freedom, meaningless, and herd mentality are main issues studied in existentialism. This essay thinks …show more content…

Existentialism considers that any external existences, ranging from material existence, to spiritual existence, such as religion, morality, and ideology are meaningless because the existences of these issues could not be established without the identification of people’s will (Webber, 2012, 3). As indicated by Sartre (1943, 310), “Each existence and external power does not exist originally”. The statement of Sartre shows that the existentialism denies original being of any external existence. Reversely, the existentialism believes that what exists originally in the universe is our “being”, which actually highlights the existing value of human’s “being”. Based on this illustration, existentialists argue that since human is the only original “being” in the world, any other existences are factually constructed by human’s creativity activities and the being of external existences is relied on the identification of human on them. Therefore, in the view of existentialism, any external existences are nothingness because their beings are decided and depended on consciousness of human. Furthermore, the existentialists deem that although there are not any other external existences in the world except for human, human should exercise its irrational instinct to create values, which is because people’s rational thinking is relied on external …show more content…

However, different from Hediger, Sartre divides being into two main types, being-in-itself and being-for-itself. Being-in-itself refers to an existence that is equivalent to the object itself (Sartre, 1943, 313). The being of certain object is decided by its own existence but not relies on external identification or judgment. Differently, being-for-itself is decided and identified by human’s subjective consciousness. Then, since the substance of consciousness consists in consciousness itself, the being of human is self-exceeding eternal. As a consequence, in the theory of Sartre, human is exceeding itself in its being forever long and human could not occupy the being of itself, which implies that “existence precedes essence”, as said by Sartre (Sartre, 1943, 315). In general, based on the Christian existentialism that recognizes externally spiritual existence, Sartre claims that human’s being exists and appears before the demonstration of human’s substance, which shows that in the view of Sartre, self-being of human is the mostly primary being and the non-existence of “me” means non-existence of any other things. Following this logic, Sartre raises that it is “myself”, the demonstration of “being” consciousness, which decides the nature of “me”. What’s more, Sartre

Open Document