The Existence of God

910 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Arguements for the existence of God

In some ways the arguments for the existence of God combat each other, in asking which one is more convincing. There are two types of arguments, there are empirical arguments along with a rationalistic argument. Anselm, Paley, and Aquinas are the three significant leaders in the philosophy world for finding an argument for the existence of God. The question that is being posed is which is more convincing, Anselm’s rationalistic proof, or the empirical arguments?
First let us see a summary of what each argument entails. First, Anselm. One of the most fascinating arguments that is for an all-perfect God, and this is Anselm’s ontological argument. The main goal of this argument is to show that it is “self-contradictory” to deny that there is a greater being. Ontological arguments are trying to prove the existence of God from the definition of God. This is coming from the concept that if a bachelor were to say, every bachelor is a male, we could apply this concept to the existence of God, and generally imply that God Exists. Though there is one issue with this way of thinking, a bachelor means within the definition that someone is unmarried, whereas with God, there is no proof for the existence of God within his definition. (Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Anselm developed two different versions of his ontological argument, in the classical version of his argument he says
“[Even a] fool, when he hears of… a being than which nothing greater can be conceived… understands what he hears, and what he understands is in his understanding…. and Assuredly that, than which nothing greater can be conceived, cannot exist in understanding along. For suppose it exists in the understanding alone: then it can be conceived to exist in reality;...

... middle of paper ...

...ip with God we are still built with infirmities that are temptations for sin, and with that we are no longer perfect.
In conclusion, we look at the different arguments proposed by Anselm and his rational reasoning argument, we look at Aquinas with his cosmological argument, and at Paley with his teleological argument. All of these arguments are arguing for the existence of God, and they can all have an effect on people. One person may prefer the rationalistic approach rather than the empirical approach. It matters not what you think is the best argument, because God can use all arguments.

Works Cited

"Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy." Anselm: Ontological Argument for the God’s
Existence.Accessed April 03, 2014. http://www.iep.utm.edu/ont-arg/.

Miller, Ed L., and Jon Jensen. Questions That Matter: An Invitation to Philosophy.
Boston, MA:McGraw-Hill, 2006.

Show More
Related

  • Anselm's Ontological Argument Essay

    794 Words  | 2 Pages

    To begin, Anselm’s ontological proof functions from the essence of God to God’s existence. The argument

    Read More

  • A Philoshpical Approach to Proving the Existence of God

    4011 Words  | 9 Pages

    The Ontological Argument, which argues from a definition of God’s being to his existence, is the first type of argument we are going to examine. Since this argument was founded by Saint Anslem, we will be examining his writings. Saint Anslem starts by defining God as an all-perfect being, or rather as a being containing all conceivable perfections. Now if in addition of possessing all conceivable perfections t...

    Read More

  • Anselm's Omnipotence

    1231 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the Proslogion, Anselm tries to prove the existence of God and his powers through the ontological argument. This argument redirects the argument of God’s existence from science and observation to logic, where Anselm explains that there has to be a being that nothing greater can be thought of, and that is God. One of Anselm’s main topics of contention is God’s omnipotence and whether He is actually infinite. In the Proslogion, Anselm talks about God’s omnipotence and if it can be disavowed because of self-contradictory statements, how God’s non-action gives him more possibility and power, and how being all-powerful can lead to God being both merciful and yet not feel the pains of sinners.

    Read More

  • The Proof of the Existence of God

    1421 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Proof of the Existence of God There are many arguments that try to prove the existence of God. In this essay I will look at the ontological argument, the cosmological. argument, empirical arguments such as the avoidance of error and the argument from the design of the. There are many criticisms of each of these that would say the existence of God can’t be proven that are perhaps.

    Read More

  • Comparing Anselm's Reply To Gaunilo

    534 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are often many mixed views when discussing God’s existence. In Anselm’s works “The Proslogion” and “Anselm’s Reply to Gaunilo” and Gaunilo’s work the “Reply on Behalf of the Fool”, both of their philosophies on the matter are imparted. Anselm’s logic regarding God is correct as he sustains his argument even when it confronted with criticisms and it is comprehensible.

    Read More

  • A Critical Discussion of Blaise Pascal's The Wager

    2073 Words  | 5 Pages

    The more probable something is likely to happen, or the more evidence presented in favor or opposed to something, the greater the tendency that a decision will coincide with that probability or evidence. This kind of logic has also been used when arguing about the existence of God. It has been argued that God’s existence is necessary based on the logic that it is contingent not impossible and therefore must exist; it has also been argued that the presence of evil in the world is evidence enough that God, or at least God as we make Him out to be, does not exist. The decisions that people make about their personal relationship with the being that has been dubbed “God” are usually based on this kind of criteria. But what if someone were to make a decision concerning God’s existence without having any evidence to sway us, how would that person choose?

    Read More

  • St. Anselm's Ontological Argument

    959 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many philosophers, including Elliott Sober, have criticized Anselm for his reply to Gaunilo, as well as Gaunilo's attempt to show the Ontological Argument is not deductively valid. Gaunilo says that there must be something wrong with the argument, but he does not point out where the mistake is. It is necessary to do so because Anselm's argument does look valid. Indeed, Anselm says that the Ontological Argument is deductively valid because of the difference between God and an island. "This seems implausible, since deductive validity doesn't depend on an argument's subject matter, only on its form, and the two arguments have the same logical form" (87).

    Read More

  • The Existence Of God

    2614 Words  | 6 Pages

    Truth, what is truth? This question itself has a thousand answers, no person can ever be sure of what truth is rather, truth can be justified, it can checked for reliability with strong evidences and logic. If the evidence proves to be accurate then it can be established that a certain answer is the truth. However, have we ever tried to think about what intrigues us to seek the truth? To think about a question and set foot firmly on the path of knowledge. Definitely it has! That was the very cause itself which is why this world has witnessed some of the greatest philosophers like Aristotle, Plato and Socrates etc. along with the school of thought. The ability to think and reason is one of the greatest ability humans have, it is what distinguishes us from the animals. It is what gives us free will, the ability to control our own outcomes. However, it is that ability to ‘think’ itself which has caused men to rebel with the myths and statements established about the unseen and natural forces since the beginning of time. It gave rise to questions such as: Do aliens exist? Is there a world of the unseen? Life after Death and the most popular question since the beginning of times, Does God exists? And the answer is ‘yes’. Here is how I will justify my stance.

    Read More

  • The Ontological Argument

    1591 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Ontological argument is a group of different philosophers arguments for the existence of God. "Ontological" literally means talking about being and so in this case, that being is the existence or being of God. The main component of the Ontological argument can be found in the Anselm’s "Proslogion" which is a short work that tries to demonstrate both the existence and the nature of God. His main aim in writing the Proslogion is not to directly prove the existence of God but to moreover, to show the relationship between faith and reason. Anselm wanted to understand the object of the belief. He is also not trying to defend his belief against the atheist and neither is he trying to convince the atheist that God exists. The ontological argument differs from other arguments in favour of God as it is an ‘a priori’ deductive argument, a priori meaning that can come to a conclusion by the use of reason and not proof. A deductive argument means that if the premises that are put into the argument are true, then the conclusion must be true. Thus, Anselm tends to base his argument on the definitions and terminology used.

    Read More

  • Anslem's Ontological Argument

    1228 Words  | 3 Pages

    Another Christian philosopher who rejected Anslem’s Ontological argument includes’ St. Thomas Aquinas. He claimed that as humans, it is ridiculous to assume the dispositions of God, since humans cannot comprehend the attributes of God nor the concept. Making Anslem’s argument “futile” since most people are not able to perceive God in the same way as Anslem. Only God could effectively use this argument to prove his existence. He also says God’s existence is not self-evident as Anslem takes it to be.

    Read More

  • St. Thomas Aquinas' Cosmological Argument

    836 Words  | 2 Pages

    Among the three arguments to prove God's existence, I find Aquinas's cosmological argument well-grounded in empirical evidence, and that the focus on simple facts proves acceptable in both historical and scientific dimensions.

    Read More

  • Does God Exist Research Paper

    929 Words  | 2 Pages

    Born as a Christian missionary child, I faced a religious conflict with my parents dealing with my faith. During my adolescence, they expected and pressured me to regularly attend Sunday service. I truly thought devoting my time and energy into the church was meaningless and wasteful being indifferent about Christianity. Eventually, I made them furious by debating the existence of God with my immature comprehension. "Does God really exist?", the ubiquitous question always arises as people try to comprehend about the creation of the world, reasons of human presence, and anticipation of the future. In this regard, several philosophers attempted to answer the compelling question and still continue to prove God's existence through their logical and rational arguments by examining and analyzing fundamental ideas. The acclaimed arguments for the existence of God in the present world are Anselm's ontological argument, Paley's teleological

    Read More

  • Three Arguments For The Existence Of God

    1220 Words  | 3 Pages

    The cosmological argument is based assertions of the first mover and a cause to prove he exist. The ontological argument is a concept of God as proof of existence. This argument is about how someone cannot doubt that there is a perfect being because you can picture one. Lastly the teleological argument is based on observation, and how things are designed for a purpose. Of all three of these arguments, the most convincing one to me is the teleological argument. I will explain why I think this with an example. When I see a beautiful sunset across the sky, I love to take a picture of it. I am amazed by the beautiful colors in the sky. When I look at that sunset I think, how could someone not believe in God. He is the one that created this beautiful sunset. He is the designer of the sunset. The sunset has a purpose, and I believe it is because God wants us to be reminded of the beautiful creations he creates. When I scroll though my Facebook feed, I often see people taking and picture of something and saying the same thing. I have seen people say something about the ocean, mountains, flowers, and so many other beautiful creations. I know that God is the designer of this world. Someone had to create that sunset, and it was God. Another reason I believe in the teleological argument is because of the purpose of objects. I believe if the eye was not designed the way it is designed, we could not see. God designed the eye the way he did for a purpose, and that was so we could see. The teleological argument is more convincing because it is about a designer that created this world and the things in this world for a purpose. I believe God created me for a certain purpose. I do not know if I have done what God has wanted me to do, but I do know I was designed for a reason. The ontological argument is not enough to convince me. This argument gives a definition of God and because of that definition he must

    Read More

  • The Mystery of God's Existence

    454 Words  | 1 Pages

    Although many cannot articulate their reasons for believing in the existence of God, their faith is nonetheless definite and true. An individual's faith in God is drawn through their personal experiences and the experiences of the community to which they belong. Thomas Aquinas, a thirteenth century theologian, used his experiences of the world to develop his proofs of the existence of God. His five proofs, which depend on natural reason, include a belief that there ...

    Read More

  • The Existence of God

    860 Words  | 2 Pages

    The ontological argument aims to prove the existence of God as an a priori argument. One of the distinguishing features of Descartes's argument is its simplicity. The argument is deductive and based on reason alone and requires no need for physical evidence of God, it attempts to prove Gods existence objectively and necessarily.

    Read More

More about The Existence of God

Open Document