The Supreme Court’s objective in establishing the exclusionary rule was to ensure that the 4th amendm...
... middle of paper ...
...t be faced with a scenario where evidence was found in an illegal manner. If citizens are expected to follow the law, then law enforcement should be held to that same standard! Gathering evidence in a fashion that violates the 4th amendment is justifiably punished by the exclusionary rule. With the plentiful amount of exceptions made to the exclusionary rule, it is inexcusable
With all the exceptions that have been added to the exclusionary rule,
The effect that my position has on the daily activities of law enforcement officers is simply that they must conduct searches and seizures in accordance to the 4th amendment.
With all this in mind it’s obvious that if the exclusionary rule or the fruit of poisonous tree can be use, then evidence must have been obtain through an illegal fashion. It is imperative that a citizen’s constitutional right is always protected.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The fourth amendment and the exclusionary rule have played a pivotal role in the court systems of the United States in determining whether or not evidence was legally obtained by a law enforcement officer. The fourth amendment protects US citizens from illegal search and seizures along with the right to avoid having to self-incriminate one’s self in court. The rights of the citizen will supersede the court case even if without reasonable doubt the defendant was guilty of committing a crime due to the exclusionary rule.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
2330 words (6.7 pages)
- The Fourth Amendment is the basis for several cherished rights in the United States, and the right to the freedom of unreasonable searches and seizures is among them. Therefore, it would seem illegitimate- even anti-American for any law enforcement agent to search and seize evidence unlawfully or for any court to charge the defendant with a guilty verdict established on illegally attained evidence. One can only imagine how many people would have been sitting in our jails and prisons were it not for the introduction of the exclusionary rule.... [tags: Exclusionary Rule Essays]
966 words (2.8 pages)
- The Exclusionary rule requires that any evidence taken into custody be obtained by police using methods that violates an individual constitutional rights must be excluded from use in a criminal prosecution against that individual. This rule is judicially imposed and arose relatively recently in the development of the U.S. legal system. Under the common law, the seizure of evidence by illegal means did not affect its admission in court. Any evidence, however obtained, was admitted as long as it satisfied other evidentiary criteria for admissibility, such as relevance and trustworthiness.... [tags: Illegal Search and Seizure]
835 words (2.4 pages)
- The ‘exclusionary rule’ was created to put under limitations the Federal officials and United States courts as they exercise their powers and authority. Additionally, it is in place to see that people maintain their own privacy and rights guaranteed in the Fourth Amendments. It also allows people to secure their premises, person, papers and other effects from unwarranted and unreasonable searches and seizures under the pretense of law. The United States constitution does not allow or tolerate police searches and seizures without warrants and therefore illegal searches and seizure unless there is a good reason for it.... [tags: Supreme Court, fourth ammendment]
1979 words (5.7 pages)
- In 1914, during the Supreme Court case Weeks versus the United States, the exclusionary rule was established (Hendrie 1). The exclusionary rule was a part of the Fourth Amendment. It states that evidence found at a crime scene is not admissible if it was not found under the correct procedures. This means that the government cannot conduct illegal searches of a person or place and use evidence that is found at that time. The government must go through the procedures of obtaining warrants or have probable cause to search an individual or place.... [tags: Illegal Search and Seizure]
939 words (2.7 pages)
- In order for the rights listed in the Constitution to have substance, there must be enforceable remedies imposed on the government for violations of those rights. In 1914, the U.S. Supreme Court, in the landmark case of Weeks v. United States,2 introduced the exclusionary rule as a remedy for violations of the Fourth Amendment.3 The Weeks Court felt that the only effective way to enforce the Fourth Amendment right to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures was to adopt a rule that evidence seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment could not be used by the government against a defendant at trial.... [tags: Illegal Search and Seizure]
615 words (1.8 pages)
- The Constitution of the United States was designed to protect citizens' civil rights from infringement by the government and law enforcement agencies. The Constitution guarantees that the civil liberties of the people of this country shall be respected and upheld. That fact is often considered to be common knowledge and taken for granted by the vast majority of the population. However it was not always that way. American legislation is constantly growing and developing. New rules and practices are being developed and established.... [tags: Illegal Search and Seizure]
1600 words (4.6 pages)
- The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule has undergone a harsh and controversial development. This article not only critically analyzes the numerous alternatives and slight modifications to the exclusionary rule but the advanced by courts and commentators as well, (Schroeder, 1361). The article also puts emphasis on the alternative route of police policy making and a means to control official misconduct and violations of citizens rights. The exclusionary rule is one of the most significant defense stance of the fourth amendment.... [tags: Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution]
791 words (2.3 pages)
- One controversial aspect of the Fourth Amendment is of how courts should seize evidence obtained illegally. The rights guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment in the Bill of Rights states that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.” However, it does not explain clearly what an unreasonable search or seizure is and in what cases a police officer should take caution when searching or seizing a suspect.... [tags: Illegal Search and Seizure]
2489 words (7.1 pages)
- The proposition that the exclusionary rule should be abolished is preposterous. There are few rules that are as useful in protecting the rights of the general public. Unfortunately, there are many who believe, for a number of reasons, that the exclusionary rule does more harm than good, and that American society suffers needlessly for the sake of protecting the rights of those who violate its laws. Opponents of the exclusionary rule perceive its gains to be dubious; its costs overwhelming. This perception is a flawed overestimation of the results of the rule’s principles.... [tags: Illegal Search and Seizure]
2149 words (6.1 pages)