According to Darwin, the relationship between science and religion is commonly represented as an issue that is irreconcilable where one side is claiming something, the other can’t accept; the inconsistencies between the two cause them to deny one another. The popular view of what constituted as science held by the majority of scientists including Darwin himself was that science was the methodical study of the organisation and conduct of the natural and material world through experimental investigation and empirical observation. Whilst, religion was primarily concerned with spiritual and immaterial substance that cannot be empirically verified and therefore could not amount to knowledge in the same way science would; he recognised religion as a simple social construction which evolved overtime. As a result, he deemed those who believe in religion rather than science as ignorant, which is clearly stated in his book “The Descent of Man” (1871), where he observed that: “Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, and not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.” (Darwin, 2010) In this case, it is noticeably evident that ...
... middle of paper ...
...usly stupid, or else the science of Darwinism is fully compatible with conventional religious beliefs—and equally compatible with atheism, thus proving that the two great realms of nature’s factuality and the source of human morality do not strongly overlap.” (Gould, 1992) This means that there is always room for both scientists and religious thinkers to follow religion and science harmoniously.
Despite the several ethical and moral views opposing science, in effect the scientific assumptions that achieve empirical verification to support the hypotheses always avails over religious beliefs by the majority of the world. Therefore, science will probably continue to govern our understanding of the world and thus religious believers and secular thinkers are required to discover ways to incorporate their views into a consistent narrative of how we as humans came to be.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Dawkins, who offers an explanation of this seemingly high-convoluted behavior in terms of a simple “evolutionary game theory”. This theory is especially relevant for this essay in terms of how politics can be understood scientifically as it implies that all human interaction and behavior is highly predictable. Political science is just syntactic sugar for “people interacting with other people”; that’s all it is really. Dawkins says that our actions are mainly determined by our genes and we make decisions based on how well that decision will allow our genes to propagate in the gene pool.... [tags: Political philosophy, Democracy, Human, Voting]
1363 words (3.9 pages)
- In Science and Religion: Are They Compatible, Alvin Plantinga argues that proponents of naturalism - like Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett - tell us that according to the theory of evolution, neither God nor any other agent has designed or created the living world, and that evolution therefore, clearly contradicts the central tenant of theistic religion (which Dennett labels “entirely gratuitous fantasy” ) If what these experts say is true, and we must understand evolution only in the context of naturalistic, unguided evolution, “then evolutionary theory is deeply incompatible with theistic religion, whether Christian…or Jewish” However, Plantinga stresses that evolution does not need to... [tags: Judaism, Christianity, Muslim]
1720 words (4.9 pages)
- Dual Motive Theory (hereinafter refer to as “DMT”) is a scientifically-grounded theory based on evolutionary neuroscience and brain physiology which provides powerful new evidences that human exchange, and indeed human perception, emerged from the interplay of archetypal neural circuitries governing early vertebrate self-preserving circuitry overlaid and integrated with later evolved mammalian other-preserving circuitry. DMT rests on the fundamental taxonomic fact that we humans are mammals. Mammals have evolved brain circuitry for both self-interest and for other-interest or Empathy.... [tags: evolutionary neuroscience, brain phisiology]
666 words (1.9 pages)
- 4. Do social factors affect the content of science or merely its production. Modern science is a discipline, which like all endeavours arose from earlier human cooperative activities. Therefore, the societal framework of a science lab, as demonstrated by Latour & Woolgar , actually determines the scientific validity of what are frequently inconclusive results. The scientific community however is not simply determined by normal societal conventions. Rather, as Bloor points out, scientists work within their own framework of norms, where ability to debate and argue is more valuable that the inconclusive hard data scientists work with.... [tags: Scientific method, Theory, Science]
1433 words (4.1 pages)
- The debate that Sociology is a science of society has lasted for many years. A cultural movement of intellectuals occurred in the 17th and 18th century as they placed reason and individuality ahead of tradition and religion, this was known as The Age of Enlightenment. Intellectuals began to tackle traditional understandings of nature and society through scientific reasoning and methods. “Sociology has been variously defined as the science of human relations, of the phenomena of social interaction, of social forms, of group interpretation, or simply as the science of society” (Sorokin 1931).The scientific method was seen as a way of controlling and understanding the world through empirical re... [tags: Scientific method, Science, Sociology, Empirical]
1406 words (4 pages)
- For years, evolutionary theory and Creationism have been at war with one another, with supporters from both sides passionately defending their beliefs while attempting to undermine the validity of the other. Despite what millions of people will say, Creationism is the only logical and /or possible way that the universe could have been created. It is shocking that millions upon millions of people would be deceived into believing the same lie, but it is true. Ever since Charles Darwin came up with his theory of evolution, thousands upon thousands of people have continued to be enticed into accepting it and, even worse, believing it.... [tags: Creationism, Darwin's Finches]
2294 words (6.6 pages)
- Evolutionary Psychology has been controversial since its rise in the 1990s, with critics and proponents debating its merits as a science. While critics (e.g. David Buller, Elizabeth Lloyd) have extensively criticized the fundamentals of Evolutionary Psychology, few philosophers or scientists have challenged them. Given the growing influence of the evolutionary behavioral sciences within mainstream science like Psychology and Anthropology, it is important analyze the critiques and see if the arguments against Evolutionary Psychology have merit.... [tags: human mind, adaptation]
2527 words (7.2 pages)
- An Evolutionary Ethical Theory of Social Risks and Opportunities ABSTRACT: Social standards guide us in what to do and what to refrain from doing. But can social — moral or legal — standards be trusted. This paper presents an evolutionary ethical theory that generates trustworthy ethical norms. Each norm is assigned a demonstrable risk, called an ethical risk, that depends on both human behavior and danger to the survival of society. The assigned risk is minimal if and only if everybody obeys the norm.... [tags: Ethics Theology Religion Research]
5259 words (15 pages)
- Expansion and the Evolutionary Lottery For a young scholar learning the basic concepts of science and biology, evolution was this grand theory of past life becoming more like present life over time via the utilization of such complicated and foreboding means as "natural selection" and "survival of the fittest." I came to understand that there was endless diversity of life, and variation was a result of the interactions of organisms with their environments. Natural selection placed pressure on the organisms forcing adaptations to be made, hence new species to arise over time.... [tags: Evolution Essays]
1357 words (3.9 pages)
- Evolutionary Ethics ABSTRACT: Michael Ruse has argued that evolutionary ethics discredits the objectivity and foundations of ethics. Ruse must employ dubitable assumptions, however, to reach his conclusion. We can trace these assumptions to G. E. Moore. Also, part of Ruse’s case against the foundations of ethics can support the objectivity and foundations of ethics. Cooperative activity geared toward human flourishing helps point the way to a naturalistic moral realism and not exclusively to ethical skepticism as Ruse supposes.... [tags: Morals Philosophy Philosophical Essays]
2436 words (7 pages)