Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
introduction to economic principles essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: introduction to economic principles essay
All the twelve great economists had great contributions to economics and they all showed great enthusiasm in studying economics. There were some differences between their concepts of economics, but all of these concepts built up the basic ideas of the economics we studied today.
There were several criterion employed in ranking the economists.
First of all, the economist should have great influences in economics. He / she should have substantial theories which could be applied in the real world and could be used as reference to other economists.
Then he / she should enjoy his / her works in finding theories or developing his / her own ideas, he / she should show enthusiasm in studying economics. If he / she could enjoy his / her works, he / she would concentrate in the process of defining the theories and ideas and would give better results. Hence, meaningful and great economics theories would be formed.
Third, he / she should dedicate to spread the ideas of economics so that all people could receive the concepts of economics and hence improve the economy in the world.
Spreading the economics ideas was very important, other could make changes to his / her concepts and correct them.
Finally, he / she should have contributions to the society. It was very important for the economist to consider the public benefits when creating his / her own ideas which might have great influence to the society. As economics relates the allocation of resources in the world, the economics theories created might affect the wealth distribution in the world.
Among the twelve great economists discussed in this course, I would rank Alfred Marshall the first and Lerner Abba Potachya the second.
In my point of view, Alfred Marshall (1842-1924) who was the first economist I learned in this course, was the greatest economist among the twelve. He was just like the father of economics. He contributed most of his life in economics.
When he started teaching political economics at St John’s College, he was committed his career to developing this subject and helping to transform it into a new science of economics. He spent several years in developing and defining his economics ideas and deepening his understandings. He also visited the USA to probe economic conditions, and throughout his life he was tireless in his efforts to master the practicalities of the economic world. It seems that most of his life was surrounded by economics.
The author, Thomas DiLorenzo, grew up in Pennsylvania. He received a bachelor of arts in economics from Westminster College in Pennsylvania. Soon after, he continued on to receive a Ph.D. in economics from Virginia Tech. Following after that, he proceeded to teach at the State University of New York at Buffalo, George Mason University, and the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. As
In this class we constantly talked about the free market place and how it truly made a government different. How it made a country different. How it made a people different. Today, we are going to explore the ideas of economics and how the economic greats, Adam Smith, Thomas Malthus, David Ricardo, John Stuart Mill, Karl Marx, John Maynard Keyes, and Milton Friedman changed the ways we would forever do business.
Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Thomas Malthus have all greatly influenced how people thought about modern economics, especially in areas relating to markets, in terms of the economy and whether certain things affected population rates. In this essay I will cover each of the three topic areas and how each economist interpreted these areas in order to explain why certain phenomena occur within British economics, most of which are still widely accepted today.
Andy Smith J. Ward February 17, 2014 History 102 Revolutionary Thinkers Locke versus Smith John Locke and Adam Smith were critically acclaimed to be revolutionary thinkers and their thoughts and reasons have very good reasons backed up with ways to describe the Economy and the Government as inefficient or wrong in their Era of their lifetime. John Locke and Adam Smith are both believers that the government should be active in supporting social and political change in the economy. Both Locke and Smith’s thoughts can be equally said revolutionary in comparison, but in terms of what era they lived in and more history that has happened to see more mistakes to correct what happened and possible future outcomes for a clear revolutionary though I believe Adam Smith’s ideas were more revolutionary and his dominant ideas that have helped what we think is the way we do things in todays economy. Smith's influential work, The Wealth of Nations, was written based on the help with the country’s economy who based it off his book. Smith’s book was mainly written on how inefficient mercantilism was, but it was also written to explain what Smith thought was to be a brilliant yet complicated idea of an economic system based on the population and the social ladder.
John Maynard Keynes, British economist, journalist, was born on June 5th 1883, in Cambridge, England. His father, Dr. John Neville Keynes, was an economist and a philosopher. Keynes attended Eton and then Cambridge University. At first he studied Mathematics but then turned his attention to Economics when he was offered the job at the British treasurer after the First World War when the British economy was at pressure. A man who gained a modicum amount of wealth during 1919 to 1938, married to Lydia Lopokova in 1926 and passed away in April 21st, 1946. Keynes believed that price level has to be stabled in order to have a stabled economy, and that is only possible if interest rates go down when prices rise. He also believed that the market forces alone will not deliver full employment but boosting government spending (main force of the economy in Keynes theory) will aim in his theory full employment or close to that. He believes by Governments intervening and spending will finally stop recession, unemployment and most importantly depression. For spending will increase the aggregate demand of the economy.
Smith believed that the unexpected result when people pursue economic gain is to promote public interest. Smith wrote document C, “The Wealth Of Nations”. In this Smith writes, “As every individual, endeavours as much as he can both to employ his capital.” Smith believes this would be a better economic system. People get wealthy making the whole country wealthy. He believed in self reliance.
Adam Smith is widely regarded as the father of modern economics and one of the greatest economists throughout the course of history. He is mainly famous for two books that he wrote, these two books are considered the base and infrastructure of the world of economics. The two books he wrote were, “The Theory of Moral Sentimental” and “The Wealth of Nations”. But although Adam Smith was such a great economic philosopher, he wasn’t a very good forecaster or future predictor. The economic scenario now is very different from the economic landscape of the 1700’s.
The dominant figure in British economics of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, who’s Principles ... still, has the power to fascinate and excite the reader. Though he wrote infrequently, his teaching at Cambridge was a major source of influence on his contemporaries. An able mathematician, he sought to express himself in the simplest lan...
helped create the new economy of capitalism with his book, "The Wealth of Nations", countries
The theory of economics does not furnish a body of settled conclusions immediately applicable to policy. It is a method rather than a doctrine, an apparatus of the mind, a technique for thinking, which helps the possessor to draw correct conclusions. The ideas of economists and politicians, both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed the world is ruled by little else. Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist." (John Maynard Keynes, the General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money p 383)
According to Sloman (2003), many people think that economics is about money. Well, to some extent this is true. Economics has a lot to do with money: with how much money people are paid; how much they spend; what is costs to buy various items; how much money firms earn; how much money there is in total in the economy. But despite the large number of areas in which our lives are concerned with money, economics is more than just the study of money. It is concerned with the production of goods and services and the ...
McEachern, W. A. (2012). Macroeconomics: A contemporary introduction (10th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Lord Lionel Robbins was born in 1898, and was one of the many great economists of our time. Robbins was known for his contributions to economic policy, methodology, and the history of ideas, but made his name as a theorist. Robbins was made famous for his definition of economics, "Economics is a science which studies human behavior as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses." (The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics 2007) Robbins was able to change the Anglo-Saxon thought economics off its Marshallian process and onto the Continental train of thought.
The crucial importance and relevance of economics related disciplines to the modern world have led me to want to pursue the study of these social sciences at a higher level. My study of Economics has shown me the fundamental part it plays in our lives and I would like to approach it with an open mind - interested but not yet fully informed.
In today's world, economics associated disciplines are of fundamental significance and application and this has encouraged me to pursue a degree in Economics. Economics has an important relevance in all of our lives. As consumers we try to make the best of our limited incomes. As workers we take our place in the job market. As citizens of a country our lives are affected by the decisions of our government: decisions over taxes, decisions over spending on health and education, decisions on interest rates, decisions that affect unemployment, inflation and growth. As dwellers on the planet Earth we are affected by the economic decisions of each other: the air we breathe, the water we drink and the environment we leave for future generations are all affected by the economic decisions taken by the human race. It is these stimulating issues that excite me about economics. I enjoy studying Economics enormously and believe my passionate interest in economics is continually strengthened by my regular reading of 'The Economist'