Victor Jara Case Study

2359 Words5 Pages

1.0 Introduction This case study that involves Delaney Constructions Limited (henceforth Delaney) & Victor Jara Developments Ltd (henceforth Jara) is a classic encapsulation of a construction contract. The contractual obligations of the two companies as well as that of the financier Pinochet Bank (henceforth the bank) are clearly stated in the contract upon its signing. However, certain eventualities arise that may bring a sharp focus on the amendments that can be made to the contract. This is consistent to the assertion that both parties of a construction contract are able to cause delays. Whilst the Client can account for a delay by continuously altering the designs of a project, the contracted party may cause these delays owing to the absence …show more content…

The Contract Administrator already accepted that the factors that were mentioned by Delaney were variations. Secondly, according to the terms of the contract, Delaney had informed the Contract Administrator of the aforesaid variations. Indeed, it could be argued that exclusive of the adverse weather conditions, the bank is responsible of the other variations as they facilitated the valuation. Also the Contract Administrator had not notify Delaney that they were not going to pay the excess variation within five days that is required by SBA/Q’s requirements concerning the Employer to the Contractor Payment (Bishop 2014). In the case of Bacal Construction (Midland) Ltd v The Northampton Development Corporation (1976), Delaney was lead to belive the information provided to them by the employer was accurate and therfore not have been aware of the PAH variation. As Delaney has followed all procedure and protocols set out in the contract regarding the variations, the exclusion of monies related to the variation is clearly a breach of contract on the Banks behalf, which is …show more content…

The section of the contract relating to extension of time and payment losses that the parties have agreed upon and signed signify that extension of time submitted by the contractor can only be considered by the financier. Nevertheless the Jct that is currently in use states that the contractor is at liberty to ask for extension of time given that there is an even out of the contractors control that can cause the work to be delayed. In the event that the contractor requires extension of time, they should write a letter to inform the Client/Project Manager of the reason for delay. In reference to clause 2.19 the Project Manager may ask for more details to be provided and should be done so in the form of a

Open Document