Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Euthanasia moral and ethical issues
Ethical and legal issues euthanasia
Ethical and legal issues euthanasia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Euthanasia moral and ethical issues
Some nations like Belgium, and Netherlands allow euthanasia because of some rational reasons, but Korea still regards euthanasia as an illegality. However, in 2009, Korean Supreme Court finally handed down the decision that accepted a woman's death with dignity and ordered to remove her artificial respiratory machine. Till this decision was handed down, there was a long, long court struggle. Is it a watershed that Korean society become generous to euthanasia? Or, is it just a proof that euthanasia is still hard to be done in Korea? Through this essay, I will explain the reason why euthanasia should be allowed in Korea for three reasons; human's right to die in dignity, burden to patients' families and themselves, and unrelatedness with social atmosphere that neglects life. First of all, every human has a right to take a charge and die in dignity. As an example of this point, there was a British man who won a suit that he asked the hospital to stop his meaningless extending life. He suffered from stroke and paralysis caused by stroke, and he wanted to die with dignity as a human. He and his family thought that there's no hope as her wife said, "nothing is going to get better". Then court respected their decision. In other words, court recognized one's right to die in dignity. Even in Korea, there was a similar case. As previously stated, in 2009, an elderly woman who became a vegetable because of brain damage which broke out in the process of screen for cancer got the right to rest in peace. Her family and proponents of their decision, argue that prohibiting euthanasia is depriving her of right to maintain dignity as a human. In addition, according to liberalism all people have freedom to do what they want to do except to har... ... middle of paper ... ...bortion applying to the law about health of mother and child. The law stipulates the permissible cases in detail. This kind of preparing regulation also applies to disputation about euthanasia. If there are proper regulations that stipulate the allowable cases circumstantially, It can prevent people from neglecting life. In conclusion, euthanasia should be allowed in Korea. I gave three reasons through this essay. Let me repeat theses again. As a human, we all have own right to die in dignity and prohibiting euthanasia obstructs this right. Secondly, patients' families and patients themselves undergo some troubles in financial and also emotional way. Finally, euthanasia is not related to social atmosphere that neglects life. Even though it causes that atmosphere, proper regulations can prevent this. For these reasons, euthanasia should be allowed in Korea.
Another reason a patient may opt to euthanasia is to die with dignity. The patient, fully aware of the state he or she is in, should be able choose to die in all their senses as opposed to through natural course. A patient with an enlarged brain tumor can choose to die respectively, instead of attempting a risky surgery that could leave the patient in a worse condition then before the operation, possibly brain-dead. Or a patient with early signs of Dementia or Alzheimer’s disease may wish to be granted euthanization before their disease progresses and causes detrimental loss of sentimental memories. Ultimately it should be the patient’s choice to undergo a risky surgery or bite the bullet, and laws prohibiting euthanasia should not limit the patient’s options.
The term Euthanasia is derived from the Greek roots, taking the words ‘eu’, meaning good or well, and ‘thanatos’, meaning death, to create the term “good death ”. (Definition of Euthanasia . 2011) The term ‘Euthanasia’ is not defined specifically within Australian Legislation, however the generalised definition states that Euthanasia is intentionally taking another person’s life by the means of a direct action or depriving a person of the medical care needed to preserve life. (Euthanasia: What Does It Really Mean? Date Unknown). Linda Jackson (2005) continues to add that Euthanasia can then be further separated into four specified categories: Passive voluntary euthanasia, active voluntary euthanasia, passive involuntary euthanasia and active involuntary euthanasia. Voluntary Euthanasia will be the specified area that will be focused on within this assignment.
patient's life is much more merciful than allowing him or her to die a slow
Today there are five to ten thousand comatose patients in long term care facilities (Wheeler A1). There are countless elderly people in care facilities that have repeatedly expressed a desire to die. There are countless terminally ill patients that have also begged for death. Should these people be allowed to die, or should they be forced to keep on living? This question has plagued ethicists and physicians throughout the years.
...d to a person’s suffering. People from all over the world have completely different opinions about assisted suicide. Many people believe that euthanasia is a very effective way of ending a person’s grief. Many people are fighting against the law. The law against assisted suicide is unjust and should be illuminated. The government should have no say in whether a person’s heart stops beating because of their agony. Euthanasia should be up to the sick individual and the government’s decision to place a law should be withdrawn. But euthanasia has to be done in an ethical manner and humanely. Restrictions should be placed around euthanasia and should be done in a very delicate and specific way. It should be understood that euthanasia should only be used under extreme circumstances and to ease a person’s pain. A person’s torturous life can easily come to a gentle close.
In this essay, I will discuss whether euthanasia is morally permissible or not. Euthanasia is the intention of ending life due to inevitable pain and suffering. The word euthanasia comes from the Greek words “eu,” which means good, and “thanatosis, which means death. There are two types of euthanasia, active and passive. Active euthanasia is when medical professionals deliberately do something that causes the patient to die, such as giving lethal injections. Passive euthanasia is when a patient dies because the medical professionals do not do anything to keep them alive or they stop doing something that was keeping them alive. Some pros of euthanasia is the freedom to decide your destiny, ending the pain, and to die with dignity. Some cons
As stated, earlier about the fear, there could be misinterpretations of the law if all euthanasia methods were legalized. The other types of euthanasia leave an open authority for someone such as a family member or even the doctor to decide if the patient’s condition is too worse to get any better and their death is in the hands of others. With the practice of voluntary euthanasia there is a respect for the autonomy, which allows the patient to do what is the correct way to go for him. For instance, Dr. Kewon also states in his article “Voluntary Euthanasia And Physician assisted Suicide: Should The WMA Drop Its Opposition?” that the respect for autonomy is an ultimate way to respect the choice of the patient under “the law [that] respect[s] a patient’s right to decide the time and manner of their death” (103.Kewron). Not only this, but even if the World Medical Association were to a take “neutral” stance on euthanasia, especially voluntary euthanasia the worldwide criminalization notion on euthanasia would drastically change and become a “treatment” process instead of crime
The word “dignity” is used used when arguing both sides of this topic. Supporters of euthanasia think that it is the right of the person suffering to end their own life with dignity. The Euthanasia Society of America was started in 1939 when this issue became popular (Behuniak). This was started as a way to start advocating for people to
Our values, opinions and beliefs depend on what culture, religion and the society we come from. People who are against view euthanasia as murder and that we must respect the value of life. Those who are in favor of euthanasia believe that doing such act eliminates the patient’s pain and suffering. Also, the right to die allows the person to die with dignity. Euthanasia may involve taking a human’s life, but not all forms of killing are wrong nor consider as murder. It depends on the underlying reasons and intentions. If you value a person’s life and the cause of death is for the patient’s benefit and not one’s personal interest, then euthanasia is permissible.
Euthanasia has been an ongoing debate for many years. Everyone has an opinion on why euthanasia should or should not be allowed but, it is as simple as having the choice to die with dignity. If a patient wishes to end his or her life before a disease takes away their quality of life, then the patient should have the option of euthanasia. Although, American society considers euthanasia to be morally wrong euthanasia should be considered respecting a loved one’s wishes. To understand euthanasia, it is important to know the rights humans have at the end of life, that there are acts of passive euthanasia already in practice, and the beneficial aspects.
Because passive euthanasia is accepted by the American Medical Association in cases where it is clear the patient has no reasonable hope of living without the aid of a machine, passive euthanasia is not as controversial as active euthanasia. This paper will focus on the controversial morality issues regarding active voluntary or involuntary euthanasia, the ending of a persons life by lethal injection with or without the patients consent. Unless oth...
Urofsky, Melvin I. Lethal Judgments: Assisted Suicide and American Law. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2000. Print.
Euthanasia had become a big debate in our society and the world. Many people ask, what is Euthanasia? “Euthanasia is a deliberate intervention or omission with the express intention of hastening or ending and individual’s life, to relieve intractable pain or suffering” (Sanders & Chaloner, 2007, p. 41). Thus the meaning of euthanasia is having the right to die if you are terminally ill, suffering and/or suffering a great amount of pain. Many people do not agree with the use of euthanasia, but if humans can put down animals why cannot we use euthanasia on humans? Back in ancient Greek and Roman times, the word euthanasia meant “good death”. Also it was allowed because many people did not live to long ages. When the times began to change so did people’s views on euthanasia, due to the new religion of Judeo-Christian Belief. Because life and death were giving to us by God, euthanasia goes against his wishes. If they practice in the act of euthanasia because of their beliefs they would be committing a sin and end up going to hell. (Yip,2009,p.1)
Euthanasia is very controversial topic in the world today. Euthanasia, by definition, is the act of killing someone painlessly ,especially someone suffering from an incurable illness. Many people find euthanasia morally wrong, but others find people have control over thier own bodies and have a right to die. A solution to this problem is to have the patient consent to euthansia and have legal documentation of the consent.
Euthanasia, according to the dictionary, means the killing of a person who is suffering from an incurable disease. Lately, it had been a huge debate over whether euthanasia should be legalized or not. Personally, I believe that euthanasia should be legalized if it is voluntary. I have three reasons for my argument.