Euthanasia Argumentative Essay

1378 Words3 Pages

An Elderly woman who is bed-ridded asks that you come over in her aid of need. The minute you reach her bedside she looks at you with innocent eyes and asks if you could cut off her life support and die. She tells you that she is currently suffering from unbearable pain that cannot be treat with medical aid. She begs you to let her end her own life in a quick and dignified manner. Would you agree to her wishes? Or go against her will and refuse. Euthanasia is the act offending the life of a person by lethal injection or by medicating drug to the patient. It is viewed a “way out” of suffering for severe pain in the body. I support the advocates argue that it reduces the amount of suffering and gives the patient are right of voice, while opponents point to the risk of lawful killing and religious actions. Euthanasia can be categorized into four different …show more content…

The law again Euthanasia is an unjustified attempt to restrict patients the right to control their life. Especially if they have the choice of continue living until a major organ gives out or riots away and have a painless death. Self-administered euthanasia: the patient administers the means of death. Other-administered euthanasia: a person other than the patient administers the means of death. For example, when the famous psychologist Sigmund Feud was in his last waking moments on a hospital bed, he had a desire to end his life by the hands of his friend Max Schur (Racheal, 98-101). Is it completely wrong to have a dignified right to die by one’s own consent. A Utilitarian would agree to the situation as hand. In their eyes, we should pursue of greatest happiness no make what the cost may be. In the sense that no personal will ever be inflicted. Sigmund Feud and the old woman both have a desire to die because they believe it is in their best interest and happiness. Thus, causing no suffering and pain to them in

Open Document