Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Legal philosophical opinions on abortion
Legal philosophical opinions on abortion
Leality of abortion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Legal philosophical opinions on abortion
Euthanasia originates from the Greek language meaning ‘good death’ or ‘gentle and easy death’ (The Life Resources Charitable Trust, 2011). Euthanasia is the deliberate and intentional act of one person to end another’s life to relieve that persons suffering. There are three different types of euthanasia; voluntary, non-voluntary and involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia is at the request of a competent person to end their life. Non-voluntary euthanasia is performed and the person is not competent. Involuntary euthanasia is performed on someone who is competent but has not expressed their desire to end their life or has stated they do not want to die (QUT, 2017).
Assisted suicide is different to euthanasia and suicide. Suicide is the act of killing
…show more content…
Autonomy is undermined by the concept of the best option for the patient and the patients right to choose. Without the legalization of euthanasia patients can’t legally exercise their right to consider all options. According to the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia, in the code of conduct for nurses in Australia, Principle 3.6 under end-of-life care, Nurses have a vital role in helping the community to deal with the reality of death and its consequences. Part ‘a’ of this principle suggests that nurses must understand the limits of healthcare in prolonging life, and recognise when efforts to prolong life may not be in the best interest of the person. While euthanasia is illegal nurses are not able to accept the limits of health care in prolonging life or accept that ending someone’s life to end that persons suffering may be in the best interest of the …show more content…
(2017, September 20). Euthanasia and Assisted Dying. Retrieved from End of life Law in Australia: https://end-of-life.qut.edu.au/euthanasia
The Life Resources Charitable Trust. (2011). A General History of Euthanasia . Retrieved from A New Zealand resource of life related issues: http://www.life.org.nz/euthanasia/abouteuthanasia/history-euthanasia1/Default.htm
The life resource charitable trust. (2011). Basic Arguments About Euthanasia. Retrieved from A New Zealand resource for life related issues: http://www.life.org.nz/euthanasia/euthanasia3/Default.htm
The life resource charitable trust. (2011). Economic Aspects of Euthanasia. Retrieved from A New Zealand resource for life related issues: http://www.life.org.nz/euthanasia/euthanasiapoliticalkeyissues/economics/ Campbell, J. (2003). Get a Life! - Euthanasia and Human Values. Retrieved from Independent Living Institute:
The word Euthanasia comes from the Greek and means “good death” (http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/hp.asp) and in the range of this paper, it will be called physician assisted suicide or “active” euthanasia. The definition of “active” euthanasia is ending one’s life yourself or with aid of a doctor. It can be done in various different ways; however, the most common form is with a combination of drugs, usually given by a physician. ( http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/hp.asp) The reason Physician Assisted Suicide (or PAS) is an important issue in this country and around the world is that there are many people out there suffering from debilitating, incurable and intensely painful diseases that would like to end their lives with dignity and without suffering. (Leo & Lein, 2010, The Value of a Planned Death)
Euthanasia is an issue so interwoven within human rights and ethics that it cannot be ignored and must be addressed with Australian society. As the Euthanasia debate consists of many different arguments and stakeholders, one issue cannot be addressed and evaluated without consulting the “bigger picture”. Evidently, if Euthanasia became legal throughout Australia, there would be many implications that would follow. Firstly, religious parties would not agree with the decision that has been made, and would possibly rally and protest against those hospitals and health care centres that acted upon euthanasia laws.
The Web. 2 May 2011. “Euthanasia.” Literary Reference Center. Web.
However, the framework in practice is very complex, and has various inconsistencies, such as the legality of refusing treatment, the sovereignty of a living will and the issue of prosecuting those who assist someone to end their lives. There is evidence that shows doctors using palliative sedation as a means to facilitate death in patients that are in extreme pain and the use of limiting or even stopping treatment at the patient’s request is not uncommon. The difficulties of putting the law into practice make it extremely difficult for courts, legislators and doctors to reach clear decisions on individual cases. Therefore, the inconsistencies in the legal framework need to be addressed, as with these present the argument against legalising the right to die is weakened. Legalising assisted dying would simplify the framework and ensure that set barriers and safeguards could be created in order to protect the patient and his/her
This essay will present in detail and with documentation the formation and growth and stated goals of the euthanasia movement in our country.
The right of someone to take their own life has been a topic of debate since the time of Romans. In this paper euthanasia will be discussed including the history, current legislation, reasons for, reasons against, and the authors opinion on the topic. With an aging population, increasing lifespan, and an increasing rate of cancers euthanasia will become a larger topic of discussion in the years to come.
Paul, P 2002, Euthanasia and assisted suicide, American Demographics, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 20-21, viewed 30 April 2014, .
[4] P. Allmark, "Euthanasia, dying well and the slippery slope," J. Adv. Nurs., vol. 18, pp. 1178-1182, 1993.
“Euthanasia is defined as a deliberate act undertaken by one person with the intention of ending life of another person to relieve that person's suffering and where the act is the cause of death.”(Gupta, Bhatnagar and Mishra) Some define it as mercy killing. Euthanasia may be voluntary, non voluntary and involuntary. When terminally ill patient consented to end his or her life, it is called voluntary euthanasia. Non voluntary euthanasia occurs when the suffering person never consented nor requested to end a life. These patients are incompetent to decide because they are either minor, in a comatose stage or have mental conditions. Involuntary euthanasia is conducted when it is against the will of the patient (Gupta, Bhatnagar, Mishra). Euthanasia can be either passive or active. Passive euthanasia means life-sustaining treatments are withheld and nothing is done to keep the patient alive. Active euthanasia occurs when a physician do something by giving drugs or substances that ends a patient’s life. (Medical News Today)
Euthanasia is a sensitive topic and its sensitivity brings the world to a division. The two sides are those who support the issue and those who are not in favour. The side that supports the idea can argue that...
Today, medical interventions have made it possible to save or prolong lives, but should the process of dying be left to nature? (Brogden, 2001). Phrases such as, “killing is always considered murder,” and “while life is present, so is hope” are not enough to contract with the present medical knowledge in the Canadian health care system, which is proficient of giving injured patients a chance to live, which in the past would not have been possible (Brogden, 2001). According to Brogden, a number of economic and ethical questions arise concerning the increasing elderly population. This is the reason why the Canadian society ought to endeavor to come to a decision on what is right and ethical when it comes to facing death. Uhlmann (1998) mentions that individuals’ attitudes towards euthanasia differ. From a utilitarianism point of view – holding that an action is judged as good or bad in relation to the consequence, outcome, or end result that is derived from it, and people choosing actions that will, in a given circumstance, increase the overall good (Lum, 2010) - euthanasia could become a means of health care cost containment, and also, with specific safeguards and in certain circumstances the taking of a human life is merciful and that all of us are entitled to end our lives when we see fit.
Kuhse, Helga. “Euthanasia.” A Companion to Ethics. Ed. Peter Singer. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 1991. 294-302. Print.
Robert Matz; Daniel P. Sudmasy; Edward D. Pallegrino. "Euthanasia: Morals and Ethics." Archives of Internal Medicine 1999: p1815 Aug. 9, 1999 .
Dougherty, Charles J. & Co. “Legalizing Euthanasia Would Harm Society.” Euthanasia- Opposing Viewpoints. Ed.
Lewis, P. (2007). The Empirical Slippery Slope from Voluntary to Non- Voluntary Euthanasia .Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 20, 197-205.