A person can exercise their first amendment constitutional rights by choosing their right to die. According to the first amendment, one has the right to freedom of speech. With this in mind, there are four different types of euthanasia: voluntary, nonvoluntary, active and passive. As mentioned by Fieser (2015, p 3), voluntary euthanasia is when a competent adult requests or gives informed consent to a particular death causing action, whereas with nonvoluntary euthanasia the decision is made by a third party, and not the person himself who is to die. Patil (2016, p 142) describes active euthanasia as the use of a lethal injection or chemical to kill and is used to terminate life and end sufferings and meaningless existence. Patil (2015, p142) goes on to state that passive euthanasia is the discontinuation of extraordinary measures and is allowed to die a natural death. Additionally, the Oregon Health Authority, (n.d.) states that on October 27, 1997 Oregon enacted the Death with Dignity Act which allows terminally-ill Oregonians to end their lives through the voluntary self-administration of lethal medications, expressly prescribed by a physician for that purpose. Given the fact that individual...
... middle of paper ...
...duals indicate their wish to end their suffering is indignity and the incapability to take care of basic needs such as going to the bathroom, and their reliance on others thus making living intolerable. James Fieser (2015, p 6) indicates the plea of death will suppress the normal feelings of living thus resulting in a life of desolation. In light of euthanasia, “There is no worse death than a hospital death as patients want to spend their last moments at home” (Frances, 2015, p 1). To sum up, the patient has the right to end their pain and misery through euthanasia.
Ultimately, an individual has the right to choose a suitable death, when they will leave the earth, and to end their deterioration of life. In conclusion, it is the patient who gets to decide how their last moments will be. Euthanasia is an alternate tool to aid in one’s transition from life to death.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- “An individual’s interest in self-determination and bodily integrity includes the right to refuse life-saving treatment even when this hastens the dying process” (Connelly, 1998 p.197). For this reason, euthanasia or “good death” refers to the taking of a human life is merciful and that all human beings are entitled to end their lives when they seem fit (Ho & Chantagul 2015 p. 252). Euthanasia is beneficial for a patient who has suffered long enough by choosing the right to a good death, when they die, and the right to end their suffering.... [tags: Euthanasia, Death, Life, Medical ethics]
828 words (2.4 pages)
- According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, Euthanasia is an adjective that is defined as the act of practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy. Euthanasia is a topic that many people see differently, depending on others thoughts and beliefs they may see things differently, this can be outlined in the different types of euthanasia, how society views types of euthanasia in general and my views and the contrary of examples where euthanasia is questioned.... [tags: Euthanasia, Medical ethics, Voluntary euthanasia]
1220 words (3.5 pages)
- Miller, Madison Mrs.Carty English 1 Honors 4-30-14 Euthanasia A person on life support is a hanging by a thread. Euthanasia is an option. Euthanasia is an assisted suicide. Its a huge controversial topic weather it right or not. Euthanasia is ending someone 's life to relieve a certain amount of pain. I wanted Euthanasia as topic because I wanted to learn the history of a topic that has a huge amount of impact on people. Euthanasia is an important topic because it 's a way to take away a person 's life away.... [tags: Euthanasia, Death, Medical ethics]
1235 words (3.5 pages)
- According to James Rachels, “both passive and active euthanasia are permissible.” (Luper and Brown, p.347). He gives a doctrine from American Medical Association quoting,” mercy killing is contrary to which the medical professional stands” (Luper and Brown, p. 347). He makes arguments against the doctrine as to why it would be rejected. One, a physician should let the patient end his life if he wants to so that the patient does not have to endure the suffering. However, Rachels says in that situation it’s better for the physician to kill the patient, rather than letting one die because using lethal injections can be painless and quick, whereas, letting one die can be a slow and painful proc... [tags: Death, Euthanasia, Morality, KILL]
1283 words (3.7 pages)
- Euthanasia, also known as “mercy killing,” is defined as an “intentional ending of the patient’s life by a physician, usually by lethal injection” (Religion Facts). A difference must be made between euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, and between active vs. passive euthanasia. In a sense, euthanasia may be compared with homicide, as death is a direct result of the action of physician, while in doctor-assisted suicide the physician is only giving the patient the means to end his/her own life (could be compared with suicide).... [tags: Death, Euthanasia, Medical ethics, Medical law]
1539 words (4.4 pages)
- As there are many forms of euthanasia, the different types shall be explained referring to Beresford (2005): “Actions that result in the withdrawal of life sustaining treatment are often referred to as passive euthanasia, while those that involve the positive act of causing death of another are referred to as active euthanasia. A further distinction can be made between voluntary euthanasia, where the consent of the patient is first obtained, and non-voluntary euthanasia, where consent is not obtained: for instance, when a patient is in a persistent vegetative state or other wise lacks the capacity to give informed consent.... [tags: Suffering, Death, Euthanasia, Medical ethics]
1211 words (3.5 pages)
- In 1973 the American Medical Association adopted a statement forbidding ‘mercy killing’ but allowing the cessation of treatment when requested by an incurable patient. In his essay “Active and Passive Euthanasia” James Rachels argues that active euthanasia should be avoided only to satisfy the law, not because of any perceived moral difference between active and passive. Rachels’ essay gives a convincing, logical argument to allow active euthanasia in certain cases. Rachels questions the doctrine that the AMA sets forth regarding intentional termination versus not using extraordinary means.... [tags: Conptemporary Moral Issues]
698 words (2 pages)
- James Rachels believes that active and passive euthanasia are not morally different from each other (Timmons, 2007, p.346). He uses the cases of Smith and Jones to argue against those that believe active euthanasia, the act killing someone, is morally worse than passive euthanasia, the act of letting some one die (Timmons, 2007, p.347). In the case of Smith and Jones, both of the men will acquire a large inheritance if anything were to happen to their six-year-cousins (Timmons, 2007, p.347-348).... [tags: Death, Euthanasia, Morality, Homicide]
1097 words (3.1 pages)
- I argue that both active and passive euthanasia are morally permissible because they both involve the ending of life due to extraordinary circumstances. If it is evident that a person is not going to get better, even with treatments, and the person wants to end their life, then that is what should be done. If a person wants to live and wants to go through with treatments for as long as possible then they should be allowed to live, but it is sometimes wrong to prolong life. We must think about the quality of life in these situations.... [tags: Death, Morality, Suffering, Suicide]
1324 words (3.8 pages)
- This means that doctors must never do anything to actively kill a patient; however the doctor does have the ability to use some discretion to ease and shorten suffering (i.e. whether to take extreme measures to prolong life). As has been noted, passive euthanasia is already a generally accepted medical practice and is permissible by Canadian law. A question to ask about passive euthanasia is, “Should we put time and effort in trying to prolong life of someone whose injuries or illnesses are so severe that they will be dead despite doctor’s best efforts?”.... [tags: Death, Euthanasia, Morality, Bystander effect]
2187 words (6.2 pages)