Before we get to the discussion I would like to point out that religious ethics and philosophical ethics are not consistent and you the audience will be able to draw your own conclusion as I continue to deliver my speech. First I am going to explain what absolute and relative means in the world of ethics. When someone has an absolute value or view it simply means that the person views are independent and not based or linked to any experience that the person might have had. So instead of comparing an idea to something in the pass the person will speak base on the situation at hand. Relativism on the other hand is the theory that holds that morality is relative to the norms of one 's culture. That is, whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced. So based on both theories we are going to look to see the views that each ho...
... middle of paper ...
...a person on a matter. So there is no way that religion and philosophical ethics can be consistent because they are built on different premises although they both seek to justify what’s right or wrong.
In concluding it can be seen where both areas share common principles on morality but religion is very wide spread and different religion believe in different things as well as different society views morality differently. Religion and its principles have always been under speculation because of their moral and the strict emphasis they placed on the society in which they are practiced about what is morally right or wrong. Although they do not know there creator they choose to believe in a higher power and the principles that governs his teachings. So base on what you have just heard, what conclusion have you drawn, is philosophical ethics consistent with religion ethics?
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The relationship between art and philosophical ethics can be divided into a dichotomy of two, radical understandings: aestheticism and moralism. Aestheticism prioritizes, if not entirely isolates, the artistic and technical value of an artwork over its moral implications. The aesthetic tradition asserts that art ought to be composed solely “for art’s sake,” hinging this position upon the assumption that only the essential component of an artwork—the sense to which the artwork is intended to appeal—is relevant in its critique (Peek, “Ethical Criticism of Art”).... [tags: aestheticism, moralism]
1298 words (3.7 pages)
- Ethics is the philosophical study of morality. These days our society is changing due to advanced technology, hence the study of ethics is very important than the previous decades. In fact, the study of ethics is not a new issue but Socrates and Plato used ethical reasoning to explain different unjust issues before 2000 years. Ethics is one of the major issues, which does have not any guideline to a particular activity that is morally good, bad or neutral. However, everyone has different understanding and judgment about ethics depend on their cultural, economical, and family back ground.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Happiness, Philosophy]
1511 words (4.3 pages)
- Philosophical Views of Animal Ethics For this essay, I chose to look at Immanuel Kant’s and John Stuart Mill’s views on the human treatment of non-human animals, specifically in the case of animal testing. I will look at Kant’s and Mill’s views separately, then the issue of the testing of animals, and finally, the philosophers’ views on the issue. I believe that both philosophers would come to the same conclusion, that animal testing is unethical in most cases. Immanuel Kant has a deontological view of ethics.... [tags: Ethics, Philosophy, Morality, Immanuel Kant]
922 words (2.6 pages)
- Ethics is a philosophical issue that is controversial today. Ethics recommends, systemizes, and defines the concepts of right and wrong behavior in our society. One’s ethics can raise the question, “What is the correct way to live in our society?” It investigates what is considered good or bad. Ethics resolves questions over human morality that ultimately dictates what is wrong or right. It does it’s best to explain what evil and good actions for human beings may look like. Many people view good moral actions interchangeably with ethics.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Religion, Argument]
855 words (2.4 pages)
- Philosophical Blindness: A Hypothetical Understanding of Ethics In Jose Saramago’s novel Blindness (1997), the readers are introduced to a bizarre world where the entire population has been affected by a blindness epidemic. Strange enough, a main character, the doctor’s wife, is presented into the plot as the only immune person to the blindness. Every reader somehow absorbs the struggles each characters exposes throughout the novel and ponders how life would be in such circumstances. The struggles the characters depict as they bare through the epidemic lead the readers towards philosophical questioning in order to reason how such tragedy would be possible.... [tags: José Saramago's novel]
1286 words (3.7 pages)
- The philosophical theories of Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics propose opposing theories on the moral worth of an action. Early utilitarians’ proposed that human beings seek pleasure and that pleasure is the only intrinsic good and since they seek pleasure, they also made a claim that humans tend to avoid pain. Therefore as humans, we tend to follow through on the actions that maximize pleasure; this theory had been simplified into the idea that actions should bring about “the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number”.... [tags: Philosophy]
1273 words (3.6 pages)
- Philosophical Foundation of Ecological Ethics ABSTRACT: Principles of Buddhist philosophy central to the formation of an ecological paradigm of mentality include a dynamic vision of the world, a system of relative truth apart from dogmas, a moral foundation for scientific knowledge, an emphasis on nonviolence and the absence of repressive scientific methods, and the progressive movement of the intellect to Universal Consciousness which postulates the unity of microcosm and macrocosm. The comparative analysis of laws and principles of modern ecological science and basic Buddhist thought points to their common intentional direction.... [tags: Ecology Ecological Philosophy Papers]
1413 words (4 pages)
The Philosophical Concept Of Human Self Interest And The Relationship Between Ethics, Altruism, And Rationality
- Egoism is the philosophical concept of human self-interest and the relationship between ethics, altruism, and rationality (Robbins). Psychological egoism and ethical egoism are the two concepts or positions that explain how one is or ought to be motivated to obtain their self-interest. The difference between ethical and psychological egoism is that the former deals with how a person should act and the latter deals with a universal concept practiced by all. With the theory of psychological egoism, selfishness proves it to be false; thus, can true ethical egoism be possible.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Individualism, Ethical egoism]
1157 words (3.3 pages)
- ... Kantian ethics would say that we have a duty to act morally good, but where does duty come from. Kant argues that only acts performed out of duty have moral worth, where a sort of special esteem comes from these acts. This duty often goes against a person's desires, but it still comes from within ourselves to want to uphold moral order, where rational incentives matter more than their opposing desires. Hume on the other hand notes that since moral decisions affect actions, while decisions of reason do not, morality must not be based on reason.... [tags: ethics, philosophical studies and discussion]
1494 words (4.3 pages)
- In what ways does Aristotle present the human being. In this paper I will interpret how Aristotle understands the human being. In the first part of this paper I will explain the concept of the human telos. In the second part I will present how Aristotle defines knowledge the four causes in his theory. In the third part I will round off the idea of a human being according to Aristotle. In the fourth part I will explain the four causes in Aristotle’s theory. Finally, I will disclose with two types of virtues presented in the theory.... [tags: virtue ethics, philosophical analysis]
766 words (2.2 pages)