Is it morally right to love oneself before loving someone else? Is the ideal of sacrificing our ideals and virtues for someone else to be happy? Which sounds better? In our society today, we live by the idea that in order to be happy, we must put that to the side in order for others to seek happiness. Doesn’t that sound backwards, in any sense? Wouldn’t make sense to have self-worth and be happy and content with ourselves first? With that being said, everyone would already be happy because everyone is happy with themselves, and then we wouldn’t have to worry about everyone else being happy. Sounds simple to follow this theory, but not truly what everyone believes it to be. Ethical egoism is often misconstrued for egotists, a person who is arrogant, boastful, inconsiderate, and self-centered. When behaving this way, it limits opportunities for happiness, when ethical egoism only concerns with maximizing one’s rational true happiness, according to Judith Boss of Ethics for life. With that being said, Ethical egoism is the most convincing moral theory because I believe that it is the best method to achieving maximum happiness. I also agree that our happiness comes first and rational actions are a must in order to know a short term or long term action is beneficial to me. Ayn Rand believes that in our society, altruism is a failed theory and we must follow her theory is that a man’s life is the standard value and how other theories like utilitarianism is not a moral right to follow in order to achieve happiness.
So what exactly is ethical egoism? The definition from the Judith Boss text Ethics for Life states that ethical egoism is a theory that mainly focuses on a person’s self-interest. Most philosophers believe that it’s one of ...
... middle of paper ...
...ing ticket or injuring myself or other people. If I would to continue to make it a habit of being late all the time, I’ll most likely bring these type of habits into other situations in my life like work, relationships, etc. In these sorts of situations, it’s we don’t make rational decisions in order to prevent any future mishaps so that it doesn’t steer away from our happiness, like losing a job or tainting relationships with the people we care about. According to Ayn Rand from her book The virtue of selfishness, Neither life nor happiness can be achieved by the irrational whims. Hedonism defines that type of happiness to be the standard of value, thus only concerning with our immediate pleasures. If we only act on these types of pleasures, such as running a red light to avoid waiting for the green light, we’re thinking irrationally now and that’s not morally right.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Ethical Egoism is a theory of morality that states “one ought always to maximize one’s own personal good as an end” (Holmes 55). In other words, Ethical Egoism is a moral viewpoint that believes it is morally right to only do what maximizes our own good or happiness. It is important to distinguish the differences between egoism and ethical egoism. An egoist may be considered selfish in that they are only concerned with maximizing their own personal good. In contrast, an ethical egoist would not be considered selfish in that they believe that everyone should maximize their own personal good and that it should be universal, not individual (Holmes 55).... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Consequentialism]
1343 words (3.8 pages)
- ... We of course can further our interests by being kind to others, because they will be more likely to do the same out of love, unless of course it is not in their interest. However, being cruel and feared is better and a more sure way to maintain our power, influence, and position, because fear is a sturdier motivator than love. Machiavelli explains our choice between the two in The Prince, “Here a question arises: whether it is better to be loved than feared, or the reverse. The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared.... [tags: goals, wants, desires, personal]
2942 words (8.4 pages)
- The Argument on How Utilitarianism is a Superior Moral Theory than Ethical Egoism Philosophy has been a field of study for centuries. Some philosophers have developed ways to determine what is ethical and what is not. This has led to several normative ethical theories describing how people are ought to live a moral life. Some of the most prominent of these theories have set the criteria for morality in very unique and peculiar ways. Two of which are the ethical egoistic theory and the utilitarian theory, each seeing morality in its own distinctive way.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Normative ethics]
1135 words (3.2 pages)
- Defending Deontological/Kant Growing up we are put in situations where we learn what is the moral thing to do and non moral just by our upbringing like religion, culture, and or race. This is called Ethics which is one of the major branch of philosophy that systematize, defend, and recommend concepts of right and wrong conduct. With that being said there are different kind of ethical approaches different philosophers discovered/ believed in which lay in the structure of consequentialist (the consequence of an action), Deontological ( duty, obligation, motivation, intention), and teleological ( striving to be a certain kind of person or fulfilling a kind of purpose ).... [tags: Ethics, Immanuel Kant, Deontological ethics]
1302 words (3.7 pages)
- Inequality in Virtue Ethics and Ethical Egoism Distributive justice attempts to limit economic inequalities that may arise in a society and is often associated with a minimum standard of living. While political equality concerns a citizen's political power, economic equality is commonly equated to equal opportunity, though the two are not mutually exclusive (Justice and Equality). In this paper I will explore the virtues of charity, tolerance, and empathy, considering their potential contribution to the reduction of inequality.... [tags: ariostotle, locke, and rousseau]
1885 words (5.4 pages)
The Philosophical Concept Of Human Self Interest And The Relationship Between Ethics, Altruism, And Rationality
- Egoism is the philosophical concept of human self-interest and the relationship between ethics, altruism, and rationality (Robbins). Psychological egoism and ethical egoism are the two concepts or positions that explain how one is or ought to be motivated to obtain their self-interest. The difference between ethical and psychological egoism is that the former deals with how a person should act and the latter deals with a universal concept practiced by all. With the theory of psychological egoism, selfishness proves it to be false; thus, can true ethical egoism be possible.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Individualism, Ethical egoism]
1157 words (3.3 pages)
- Jeremy Bentham was a British political reformist and philosopher. Bentham is best known for his moral philosophy and philosophy of law. While Bentham’s work was not heavily influential during his lifetime most historians agree his works published posthumously had a huge impact on western philosophy and law. Bentham lived from 1748 to 1832 and lived primarily on his wealthy fathers inheritance allowing him to focus on writing. Most of Bentham’s work was philosophy of law - his most famous work being An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation which focuses primarily on moral philosophy.... [tags: biography, british reformist]
1009 words (2.9 pages)
- Ethical Egoism A rear assumption is that the needs and happiness of other people will always effects on our moral ethics. If we accept this assumption, we think that our moral ethics are balancing our self-interest against that of others. It is true, that “What is morally right or wrong depends not only on how it makes us feel, but also how it affects others”. The idea of each person ought to pursue his or her own self -interest exclusively to do in his life time for others is known as Ethical Egoism.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Ethical egoism]
728 words (2.1 pages)
- The ethical issue I picked that I thought was most important in this case is privacy. I picked this as the ethical issue because if the pictures are sent to each other than both people involved privacy is compromised. It is not only a legal and policy issue because when their privacy is broken it can change how they feel about their self and how others in the area view them if they find out she sent nude photos. The moral agents in this case in my opinion are both Mary and her boyfriend. I find that Mary is a moral agent because if she sends the nude photo then she is responsible for own actions since she let down her privacy by sending the photo to her boyfriend who could show them to anyo... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Normative ethics, Altruism]
1425 words (4.1 pages)
- Hedonism and Ethical Hedonism Philosophers commonly distinguish between psychological hedonism and ethical hedonism. Psychological hedonism is the view that humans are psychologically constructed in such a way that we exclusively desire pleasure. Ethical hedonism is the view that our fundamental moral obligation is to maximize pleasure or happiness. Ethical hedonism is most associated with the ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus *http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/e/epicur.htm* (342-270 BCE.) who taught that our life's goal should be to minimize pain and maximize pleasure.... [tags: Papers]
987 words (2.8 pages)