Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical decision making case study essay
Factors in ethical decision making
Ethical dilemma case studies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction In becoming a public administrator one will face a number of issues. Some of these issues will entail confronting ethical matters. In this paper, the following decision making models are discussed; Werhane, Greenleaf, Rest, Nash, Markkula, and Badaracco. These models are explained, compared, and contrasted. Additionally, their strengths and weaknesses are identified. The end product in this assignment is the creation of my own ethical decision making model influence by the six models studied in this paper.
Ethical Decision Making Models The Werhane Model relies on the concept of moral imagination. Moral imagination has three components. The first is Reproductive Imagination. Reproductive Imagination is having a sense
The Badacco’s Model inquires that individuals think about what the real issues are at hand. Furthermore, the model prompts individuals to assess what they are accountable for and what they have control over. Furthermore, the Badaracco’s Model encourages the individual to think about how the decision will be realized and forces an individual to look at multiple perspective to ensure the appropriate decision was taken (Week 10, 2016). Moreover, there is an emphasis in the model about looking at one’s core values to determine whether the decision made aligns with the right core values. Lastly, the individual through the use of this model analyzes whether the decision at hand aligns or measures up with their
Rest’s Four Component Model, Markkula’s Model, and Werhane all indicate that the first step is recognizing the ethics behind an issue. The second element that is common across most models is the concept of consequences. Markkula’s Model, Greenleaf’s Ethical Test, Nash’s Model, Greenleaf’s Ethical Test, and Rest’s Four Component Model all consider the consequences a decision may have on an individual or group of people. Greenleaf’s Ethical Test requires an individual to consider the effect the decision will not just individuals or groups of people but the whole society. A third element that is common across some models relates to viewing an issue through different perspectives. Werhane’s Model explicitly emphasizes individuals to look at problems from different points of view. Nash’s model also asks individuals to do the same. Meanwhile, Markkula’s has an individual seek out other individuals that will offer different perspectives on the issue. Bardacco’s model goes beyond analyzing an issue through different perspectives, but also helps an individual develop methods to evaluate appropriate
Stout, M., & Love, J. (2013). ETHICAL CHOICE MAKING. Public Administration Quarterly, 37(2), 278-294. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.library.unlv.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1355492932?accountid=3611
In society we will always faces ethical and unethical choices. There are time when we cannot always chose the ethical approach. Other decisions primarily only affect us as individuals. However, when you are in the public eye such as police officer your decisions affect others. In this paper the discussion will be based on the Kansas City case study.
Ethical decision-making is the responsibility of everyone, regardless of position or level within an organization. Interestingly, the importance of stressing employee awareness, improving decisions, and coming to an ethical resolution are the greatest benefits to most companies in today’s world (Weber, 2015).
How a person makes decisions can be based on multiple different things. A lot can be based on a person’s values and morals. These morals and values can be very different from person to person and culture to culture. Culture is the learned portion of human behavior, it is the basis many values and morals are built on. Just because a person has different ideas from you does not make them wrong. Ethical decisions must be made by looking at and accepting different viewpoints. The Ethical Lens Inventory (ELI) is a tool to help determine how one makes decisions. To begin to understand the ELI, one must understand the four core values of autonomy, sensibility, rationality, and equality. Autonomy is defined by dictionary.com as “the independence
Ethics is the study of how people should live. people have different views and beliefs of how they're supposed to live their life. people from all over the world have different ethical beliefs and different ways to determine which beliefs are right and which are wrong. when you visit a different country, you notice things they are doing and those things might seem wrong to you and you would never consider doing what they have just done but in their society its normal and everyone does it. inside the margins of this paper I am going to analyze the top three models used to determine a morally significant being based on the criteria in your book. I will first define a moral agent and a morally significant being then take you through the steps to deciding what a significant being is and which criteria you would use for each.
These phases may change people’s perspectives on how they will approach certain situations. It would help if everyone could apply these phases in their daily lives because it would eliminate tough situations where there is no time to think. Wheelwright gives his readers a better understanding of what an ethical person should think like. In Gig, Thomas uses two out of wheelwright’s phases, but even then he still wasn’t satisfied with the result. It all depends if these phases are applied in our lives correctly. They may not work one hundred percent correctly, but they will help make our lives a little easier.
The six steps of the model are as follows: Identify the ethical dilemma, collect information, state the options, apply ethical principles to those options, make the decision, and implement the decision (Beemsterboer, 2010). The first step is to identify the ethical dilemma, which Beemsterboer describes as the most critical step in the model. To identify the ethical dilemma, one must recognize that the problem is an ethical dilemma with no one clear answer, and expound upon what the ethical question is. The next step is to collect information about the situation and values involved “as a basis for an informed decision.” (Beemsterboer, 2010, para. 8). After defining the ethical dilemma and gathering information about it, one must then state as many options as possible which may resolve the problem (Beemsterboer, 2010). Due to that fact that more than one decision may remedy an ethical dilemma, it is important to discuss all available options to better understand all angles of the situation and how to deal with as many of them as possible. Once all alternatives have been stated, each must be weighed against ethical principles. Beemsterboer suggests in the discussion of each option a list of pros and cons be made to demonstrate how the option may protect of violate ethical principles and values (2010).?? After analyzing each alternative it is much easier
What is ethics? Ethics are the philosophical principles of good verses bad moral behavior. It is a guideline to help people make decisions or make a judgment calls. There are two main types of ethical principles that will be discussed in this paper, and how they are applied to the decision making process. They are Deontological and Utilitarian. Deontological ethics are based on the righteousness or wrongness of the action-taking place. It does not base itself on the bad or good consequences that come from the action. Immanuel Kant introduced deontological ethics in the 18th century. Kant believed that every decision or action made by a person had to be evaluated by his or her moral duty. He stated that humanity shouldn’t side on its
...tes possibilities of collision and clogging of ideas during the implementation stage. Within these factors, the therapy is essential in ensuring that different problems are addressed using personalized ideas.
Carson, Thomas. A. A. The "Ross Ethical Theory" Ross Ethical Theory. N.p., n.d. Web. The Web.
The main idea of this perspective is that people make goal-directed decisions based on their rational thinking. (Hutchison, 2015) In this case study, rational choice perspective is used by Laura, Danny, and Kid. Each member provides a strong example of rational choice based on their own self-interest.
In this assignment we will be identifying an ethical dilemma an individual has experienced. We will begin with a short introduction of what an ethical dilemma is, moving on to providing brief details of the dilemma an individual has experienced. We will then go on to selecting one ethical theory, to show how it can help an individual understand and deal with the situation when placed within, followed by a conclusion.
Ethical theories are a way of finding solutions to ethical dilemmas using moral reasoning or moral character. The overall classification of ethical theories involves finding a resolution to ethical problems that are not necessarily answered by laws or principles already in place but that achieve justice and allow for individual rights. There are many different ethical theories and each takes a different approach as to the process in which they find a resolution. Ethical actions are those that increase prosperity, but ethics in business is not only focused on actions, it can also involve consequences of actions and a person’s own moral character.
Vroom-Yetton-Jago’s normative decision model includes five forms of decision-making and helps leaders and followers determine how much input followers should have in the decision-making process. On a basic level, when leaders allow followers to patriciate in the decision-making process, they are giving them something to do. When employing this model a leader is ultimately giving their followers five possible things to do decide, consult individually, consult group, facilitate, and delegate.
Everyone in this world has experienced an ethical dilemma in different situations and this may arise between one or more individuals. Ethical dilemma is a situation where people have to make complex decisions and are influenced based on personal interest, social environment or norms, and religious beliefs (“Strategic Leadership”, n.d.). The leaders and managers in the company should set guidelines to ensure employees are aware and have a better chance to solve and make ethical decisions. Employees are also responsible in understanding their ethical obligations in order to maintain a positive work environment. The purpose of this case study is to identify the dilemma and analyze different decisions to find ways on how a person should act