ya

√Introduction:

The relationship between communication and organization:

Did the chicken come first, or did the egg. This age old question is serves to reinforce the concept that despite the conception that two concepts may be unique and very different in their own various capacities, it is possible for two concepts to be foundationally associated in a manner, which assures the mutual continuation of both. As with the case of the chicken and the egg, regardless of whoever is deemed as the source of origin, both are deemed prerequisite for the continuation and development of both chickens and eggs. The nature of the relationship between communication and organization is similarly indistinguishable.

The concept of communication embodies much more than simple conversation between individuals. This is because defining communication to simple verbal exchanges would limit the capacity for true communication. Communication is complex, requiring many different processes in order to achieve maximum utility.

Communication begins with the sender, or the individual who is responsible for initiating a communication exchange. The sender must determine how his message will be codified and establish the form is which communication will be exchanged. Codification of communication can be verbal, it can be non-verbal through use of gestures, facial expressions or posturing, it can be written, and lastly the codification of a message can be found in no message at all. Upon establishing a message and the code in which it will be relayed to another, the sender must offer said message into a communication channel to allow a potential receiver to accept the message. Upon receiving and decoding the message sent through the channel by the sender, th...

... middle of paper ...

... the department heads, and the various positions within the departments. Additionally, we had to create an auditing process for individuals found not to be completing their assigned task to satisfaction.

In particular one of the issues faced here was lack of communication between the department leaders and the executive boards. This proved extremely problematic as there were times where the executive board would be unaware of the daily activities of the organization due to lack of reporting on the part of the department heads. In order to resolve this problem, the executive board began a series of bi-weekly meeting target to allow the department heads to present the activities of their respective departments and allowed the executive board to receive a more in depth understanding of what was taking place within the various student council departments.

Conclusion: