v

686 Words2 Pages

The article I’ve chosen to analyze is Joe Sharkey’s “Airport Screeners Could See X-Rated X-Rays,” (Elements of Argument, P. 15-17). Joe Sharkey is a columnist for the NEW YORK TIMES, as well as an author. His columns mainly focus on business travel, although his non-fiction books concentrate on criminal misconduct. He has also co-authored a novel, Lady Gold. At one time he was the Assistant National Editor for the Wall Street Journal, the City Editor for the Albany Times-Union, and a journalist for The Philadelphia Inquirer. Knowing about the author is important because you know that he/she is accredited and knows about the topic they are writing about. There are so many people out there that just write to write not knowing what exactly what they are talking about, giving false accusations or their own opinion about things. So knowing about the author gives you a little more ease when you are talking about their article to other people, since you will know who the author is and some of their background. You wouldn’t want a doctor writing an article about teeth and oral health, nor would you want a dentist to write an article about broken arms and legs. However, you would want a doctor writing about broken arms and legs and a dentist to write about teeth and oral hygiene. Airport Screeners Could See X-Rated X-Rays was published on May 24, 2005. It’s important to know the date of publication, because it allows people to understand the events that occurred during this time and the events that occurred up to this time. This aids individuals to better understand the history in another individual’s viewpoint. This article was published four years after the event known as 9-11 and a year after two planes in Russia blew up. Both events oc... ... middle of paper ... ...ing. He mainly talks about the new technology being introduced to airports. However this new technology lets people know about the new screeners being installed in the airports plus what they will do and how they will work. He states important facts, views, and ways on how these new screeners will help with airport security not only to keep their staff and selves alive and safe, but to also keep you alive and safe as well. In 2005 the screeners were improved technology for the airport, but not foolproof. As this technology is better, there are still possibilities for people to get prohibited items through security. As an example, in his article he states that, “a weapon or explosives pack could be tucked into flabby body folds that won’t be penetrated by the scanner”. Nonetheless since these scanners have been installed there has been no major attacks on U.S. soil.

Open Document