Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relationship between god and evil
Problem of evil essay help123
The problem of evil analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relationship between god and evil
The problem of evil is often used by atheists as an escape from acknowledging the Lord (Elwell 2001). The unbeliever does fairly question the motive of an all loving God allowing evil to supposedly prevail in this world. He or she wants and explanation of why God would allow natural and moral evils to continue, seemingly, undaunted and unchecked by our invisible God. Anyone considering the truth of a Christian’s claim to have a personal relationship with the Almighty often fails to see the logic of faith and misunderstands the internal consistency that does in fact stand in harmony when considering the ultimate plan of God.
The Bible is the only authority that is needed to render a truthful explanation of all of these seemingly contradictory problems of evil. First, however, it is helpful to use sources outside of the Bible to define various terms and then the answers can be sought from God’s word.
The ‘problem of evil’ is the attempt to understand the reason and existence for evil by various authorities throughout generations such as theologians and philosophers (Elwell 2001). It has many faucets and also depends in understanding what ‘internal consistency’ means: To question if a “theological position” “contradicts itself” (Elwell 2001, 414). There are two types of evil that need to be defined. First, natural evils are such that are outside of responses to a consequence for evil actions. For example, it is considered natural evil if a tsunami takes the lives of thousands seemingly indiscriminately men, women, and children. Second, moral evil is such that is the consequences of abuse of free will. For example, it is considered a moral evil committed when a parent leaves a child to starve to death when the home has a cupboa...
... middle of paper ...
...e to do evil. Again, what Satan intended for evil, God intended for good. Evil is not an eternal aspect of God’s good plan, but God promises he will contend fully and permanently with evil in his good time.
What an unbeliever has to reconcile is to understand that our ways are not His ways. God once said to Isaiah, “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.”
Works Cited
Isa 45:7 (all scripture KJV Bible unless otherwise noted)
Gen 3:22
Job 1:8, 2:3
Job 42:11
Isa 43:7
Job 42:12-17
Romans 1:28-32
Gen 50:20
Genesis 50:20
Rev 20:10
Rev 22:3-6
Isaiah 55:8-9
Elwell, Walter A., ed. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology: Second Edition. Grand Rapids Michigan: Baker Academic, 2001.
In his essay, "The Magnitude, Duration, and Distribution of Evil: a Theodicy," Peter van Inwagen alleges a set of reasons that God may have for allowing evil to exist on earth. Inwagen proposes the following story – throughout which there is an implicit assumption that God is all-good (perfectly benevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient) and deserving of all our love. God created humans in his own likeness and fit for His love. In order to enable humans to return this love, He had to give them the ability to freely choose. That is, Inwagen holds that the ability to love implies free will. By giving humans free will, God was taking a risk. As Inwagen argues, not even an omnipotent being can ensure that "a creature who has a free choice between x and y choose x rather than y" (197)1. (X in Inwagen’s story is ‘to turn its love to God’ and y is ‘to turn its love away from God,’ towards itself or other things.) So it happened that humans did in fact rebel and turn away from God. The first instance of this turning away is referred to as "the Fall." The ruin of the Fall was inherited by all humans to follow and is the source of evil in the world. But God did not leave humans without hope. He has a plan "whose working will one day eventuate in the Atonement (at-one-ment) of His human creatures with Himself," or at least some of His human creatures (198). This plan somehow involves humans realizing the wretchedness of a world without God and turning to God for help.
The problem of evil is a difficult objection to contend with for theists. Indeed, major crises of faith can occur after observing or experiencing the wide variety and depths of suffering in the world. It also stands that these “evils” of suffering call into question the existence of an omnibenevolent and omnipotent God of the Judeo-Christian tradition. The “greater good defense” tries to account for some of the issues presented, but still has flaws of its own.
Coogan, Michael David., Marc Zvi. Brettler, Carol A. Newsom, and Pheme Perkins. The New Oxford Annotated Bible: New Standard Version with the Apocrypha : An Ecumenical Study Bible. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2010. Print.
Throughout the world, most people believe in some type of god or gods, and the majority of them understand God as all-good, all-knowing (omniscient), and all-powerful (omnipotent). However, there is a major objection to the latter belief: the “problem of evil” (P.O.E.) argument. According to this theory, God’s existence is unlikely, if not illogical, because a good, omniscient, and omnipotent being would not allow unnecessary suffering, of which there are enormous amounts.
This essay examines a paper by Peter Van Inwagen, “The Argument from Evil”. Inwagen’s paper attempts to give a possible reason for why there is evil in this world. However, this essay will attempt to give reasons for why Inwagen’s reason for evil does not explain evil without compromising God’s essential quality of moral perfection.
The author suggests that an effort in attempting to figure out “why” evil exists will not provide substantial answers, but more focus on understanding the necessity of evil to allow
In “The Fish” by Elizabeth Bishop, the narrator attempts to understand the relationship between humans and nature and finds herself concluding that they are intertwined due to humans’ underlying need to take away from nature, whether through the act of poetic imagination or through the exploitation and contamination of nature. Bishop’s view of nature changes from one where it is an unknown, mysterious, and fearful presence that is antagonistic, to one that characterizes nature as being resilient when faced against harm and often victimized by people. Mary Oliver’s poem also titled “The Fish” offers a response to Bishop’s idea that people are harming nature, by providing another reason as to why people are harming nature, which is due to how people are unable to view nature as something that exists and goes beyond the purpose of serving human needs and offers a different interpretation of the relationship between man and nature. Oliver believes that nature serves as subsidence for humans, both physically and spiritually. Unlike Bishop who finds peace through understanding her role in nature’s plight and acceptance at the merging between the natural and human worlds, Oliver finds that through the literal act of consuming nature can she obtain a form of empowerment that allows her to become one with nature.
Although this is not a guarantee to come from evil, it is what leads most down the righteous path. Being able to will for God to fix their will is what allows God to intervene and fix someone’s defective free will. The fixing of defective free will by a person freely willing that God fix it is what Stump believes to be the foundation of a Christian solution to the problem of evil.
Philosophers of the Medieval period struggled with the problem of evil - specifically, the existence of evil brought a question to the fore: if the world was created by an omnipotent and omnibenevolent God, then how was it that evil existed? To further complicate the matter, a second question branched off of the first as individuals pondered over whether or not God was ultimately the cause of evil. If God created everything, and evil exists as part of everything, then God, logically, had created evil. But this presented yet another issue, in that if God had knowingly created evil, then he could not truly be all-good. And it is these concerns that philosophers addressed.
The question of evil is a common topic among non-believers. Evil has existed since the beginning of time. In today’s society people have become so desensitized to evil, the true origins become hard to understand. God gave us each the free will and ability to choose right from wrong, although many of God’s creation continue to choose sin. The Holy Bible explains to us the nature and root of sin. This explanation helps us understand why bad things happen and how it might affect our relationships with the Most High.
During the sixteenth century and even into the seventeenth century, scientific discoveries and new empirical ways of thinking began to emerge. This period of history is commonly referred to as the Scientific Revolution. The Scientific Revolution challenged past authorities by challenging church teachings, philosophy, and traditionally held views of humanity’s place in the cosmos.
Theological books describe evil in two broad categories, that is, moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is a phenomenon that entails the willful decision to do wrong. It is associated with acts of intentional wrongdoing that includes robbery, murder, rape, and theft. This category of evil is the foundation of sin, and is punishable according to biblical teachings. It is also considered as an offense under the laws of the land. These offenses can occur because of influence, or due to an individual’s willingness to take part in sin.
The problem of evil has been a huge debate between atheists and theists. The problem of evil is how can evil occur in the world if God, a perfect being, created the world, and why do bad things happen to good people if God is in charge. Used to critique theism, the problem of evil questions God’s perfection and his existence. It questions God’s perfection by saying, “Whoever does not chose the best is lacking in power, or in knowledge, or in goodness” (Leibniz 89). This means that people do not think that God can be all powerful or perfect because they do not think that this world was the best possible choice. The problem of evil also critiques the question of God’s existence by saying, “If there is more evil than
In this country, according to CSN news, “74 percent of U.S. adults believe in god.” That is a pretty high number for such a complex, modernized society. But where does all the faith and belief come from? People believe that God is always looking out for us and that he would never do anything to hurt us intentionally. People believe that God is in control of our destiny and controls everything that happens to us in this world. But then, this brings me to my main question, if God is seen as such a good being, then why are there so many problems in this world? Epicurus, a Greek philosopher phrases the idea of God and evil by saying “Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then God is omnipotent. Is God able, but not willing? Then God is malevolent. Is God both able and willing? Then where does evil come from? Is God neither able nor willing? Then why call such a being God (Lecture 30)?” Why are there disease, natural disaster, animal suffrage, poverty, abuse, and so much more? In this research paper, I will talk about what evil is and a few problems of evil that are present in the world. Then, I will attempt to answer if there is so much evil present in this world, is it even likely that there is a God and should we blame him?
Evil 's beginning can be found in Genesis chapter three when the serpent begins to tempt Eve. Evil can be anything of God 's creation that man has put a twisted spin on in order for it to be pleasurable or satisfying. Because humans find pleaure in evil, it begins to diminish the relationship to God, and blinds man from the truth of the gospel. Because of evil, some have tried to pin the point of evil onto God since He is the creator of everything, thus creating problems between God and evil by trying to draw distinctions between the two. The problem with evil is that it takes different forms, according to Erickson one form is that of religion when "some particular aspect of one 's experience has had the effect of calling into question the greatness or goodness of God, and hence threatens the relationship between the believer and God." 11 The next form is theological saying that "it is not a question of how a specific concrete situation can exist of light of God 's being what and who he is, but of how any such problem could possibly exist." 12 By identifying these different types of problems with evil, the soultion will be realized. One way of solving this debate is to leave the idea of God 's omnipotence. This approach is called finitism, which says that there are two principles within the universe, "God and the power of evil" 13