Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
architecture Romans influenced by the Greeks
the history of roman architecture
roman architecture structure engineering
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: architecture Romans influenced by the Greeks
The Pantheon
The Pantheon was originally commissioned by Marcus Agrippa during the reign of Augustus (27 BC - 14 AD) it was then rebuilt by Emperor Hadrian c.125. The Pantheon is one of the most influential architectural designs in history, its pediment, pillars and dome are it most copied elements and their influence can be seen in building all over the world.
From the front the building looks like a lintel and post style build, but it is actually a circular building. If you approached the Pantheon when it was originally built you would have approached through a colonnade that would have hidden the barrel shaped of the main part of the building. When looking at the Pantheon from the front you see the traditional architectural design of the time, for a grand building, the pillars and the pediment. The pillars are made from single pieces of marble in a Doric style, which were imported from Egypt. The pillars rise up from the floor and fuse with the pediment with intricate Corinthian capitals. The Doric style presents itself again in the frieze because it is plain and only contains a Latin phrase.
The true greatness of the building is in the main room, the atrium is a huge open area in a radial style with a central point being in the center of the room. The room is filled with a combination of circles and squares which illustrates the Romans fascination with geometric shapes. Along with geometric shapes the inside of this building full of brilliant shades of oranges, blues and purples. There are ionic style pillars around the base of the room as well as sculptures of different gods. Just above the main room there is a frieze of false windows that make a band around the midlevel of the room. Although the windows are false there ar...
... middle of paper ...
...re vast differences on the insides of these buildings, with the past of nearly five hundred years the Romans learned a tremendous amount. As mentioned before, the romans mastered the use of concrete which allowed them to build stronger, grander buildings. Also, the romans commanded a vast empire which allowed them to gather materials from far off lands.
The Pantheon and the Parthenon are two of the most influential building in history. They share some basic styles, pillars, pediment and frieze, even though they share these elements they are vastly different on each building. The Pantheon shows how with the advancement in technology bigger, stronger thing can be built. The Greeks however show great craftsmanship in the Parthenon, with its carvings and reliefs. The fact that these building are standing today is a testament to genius of both the Romans and the Greeks
For much of the last millennia many great architects have looked upon the Pantheon as a staple of classical architecture, as well as a model for many modern day buildings. Created by the Romans, the Pantheon would use many elements better than any other works of architecture to that time. No further than Columbia Missouri is this evident in the construction of what used to be known as the First Academic Building on the University of Missouri campus. The Architects Bell and Binder headed the creation of the new building after the First Academic Building burnt down in 1892. Known today as Jesse Hall, this modern day work of architecture pulls many elements from the Pantheon to create a unique work of public space. The most glaring comparison of both comes from the domes that top both buildings. Each building also shares similar characteristics in their front facades. Yet, while there are many similarities to both works, each contain unique differences in their layout and construction.
The Pantheon was a Roman concrete structure. Roman concrete is a mixture of lime and volcanic ash (pozzolana, found near modern-day town Pozzouli). Roman concrete is also called hydraulic cement-based concrete. It is known for curing relatively rapidly, even in damp condition, thus it could be used for massive construction. The most daring thing about the use of Roman concrete in the Pantheon is that Portland cement needs steel reinforcement due to tendency of cracking caused by tension forces, meanwhile the Pantheon did not. The Pantheon still stands today is because of its special structure.
Second, these two structure perfectly aligned themselves with the trend of their respective era. Third, despite being thousand years apart in term of style and techniques, those two structures achieved a very similar goal in defining beauty, somewhat harmony and strength. The evolution of the work of Art can be observe as we go from the rough exterior aspect of the Roman Pantheon to the slick and stylish aspect of the Macon Auditorium. Through our public building and even in some case our private home each of us live in a little piece of the Pantheon. We can forcefully assert that the Middle Age set the foundation of our modern society through various form of Art, and Architecture is the living proof of Art defining the human
Pantheon and Hagia Sophia Pantheon and Hagia Sophia are two extremely outstanding architectural pieces of their times. They have been built according to the traditions of those particular times. The materials used to built these buildings and the purpose for which they were used are all very important aspects and have been briefly covered in this report. Pantheon The statesman Agrippa built pantheon in 27 B.C. Then it was completely rebuilt by the emperor Hadrian. The Pantheon is remarkable for its size, its construction, and its design. The dome was the largest built until modern times. The present structure was probably originally built as a temple for all the pagan gods. We do hear of it as being a law-court and a reception area for Emperor Hadrian meeting his quests too. Some say that the rotunda of the building was once a Roman bath. Due to all this mystery, the Pantheon is often referred to as the Sphinx of Rome. The visitor will probably not appreciate the construction as much as the Flavian amphitheatre, but it is still a great masterpiece of engineering and well worth a visit. Most Roman and Greek temples at the time of the Pantheon's construction were large, colonnaded, rectangular enclosures with sanctuaries situated in their centers. The Pantheon was different. It consisted of a large circular drum topped with a hemispherical dome. It is a masterpiece of both engineering and art a lasting memory of Ancient Rome’s might. Roman architecture is architecture of wall and enclosed tactile space. Individual column with entablature is no longer the basic architectural unity. Spatially, it shows a development from closed, simple space units and regular articulation to more complex spatial relations, more fluid interpenetrati...
The Roman Pantheon built by the Romans using advanced engineering skills combined a cylindrical structure with an outer colonnade Greek classical design to make an architectural monument. The amount of time and effort that went into the building of this structure shows a cultural emphasis on quality workmanship and perfectionism. This workmanship and perfectionism showed the importance given to the worship and honoring of the Gods. This pantheon is the only active place of worship amongst Rome’s ancient temples still in existence. Modern commentators tend to view the building as a high point in an "architectural revolution" brought about mainly through the Roman development of a superior pozzolana concrete that lent itself to the forming of unitary, three-dimensional structures. Other factors cited for the technical success of the Pantheon include the use of a series of massive, concentric stepped rings and the lightening of the dome by coffering and gradated light-weight aggregates. ( Mark, Robert, and Paul Hutchinson, 1986) The concrete dome was one of the world’s largest unreinforced concrete builds for over a millennium until the modern era. The success of the Pantheon longevity was largely attributed to acquired new techniques of construction and materials that shaped the development of Roman construction technology. This allowed for the use
The engineering discoveries of ancient Rome have played a key role in the history of architecture and engineering. Many of Rome’s roadways, bridges, and aqueducts have been in use from the first century until the twentieth century. Many American buildings have used the Roman dome. Several major structures from early Rome still stand, including the Collosseum. These remnants of feats of Roman engineering stand as a monument to the ability of ancient Roman builders.
Before addressing the column’s physical attributes it’s important to discuss the significance of the closely related landmarks that surround it. According to author Marilyn Stokstad, “The last and largest Imperial Forum was built by Trajan about 110-113 CE and finished under Hadrian about 117 CE on a large piece of property next to the earlier forums of Augustus and Julius Caesar” (Stokstad 191). At the north end of the courtyard was a closed off section from a building referred to as the Basilica Ulpia (Fig. 2). It was created in c. 112 CE and named after the family which Trajan had been a part of. The basilica was a long, spacious structure measured 385 feet long (without the apes included) and 182 feet wide that was mainly used for government related purposes (Stokstad 192). There were also two libraries behi...
The Greek Parthenon is dedicated to the Goddess Athena and was designed to house a single, large statue of her. Furthermore, the building itself is designed to be pleasing to the eye and has a repeating series of 9 to 4 ratios in its construction (overall length to width, face of building width to height, etc…). It is also sighted on a prominent feature, visible for miles around. In short, it is as much a statement of artistry and power for the Athenian city state as it is a temple to venerate Athena. The Roman Pantheon is a much more utilitarian building built in the middle of the city and is admired today more for the fact that it has the largest concrete dome ever built than for its overall beauty. It is an engineering statement. Seen from the front it resembles the Parthenon but one gets a whole different feeling when viewing it from the side where it looks like a square building mashed together with a rectangular one and then with a cylindrical one. Only the front of the Pantheon has any decoration versus all four sides of the Parthenon. This utilitarian theme continued inside where the statues of many gods were placed around the outside perimeter, leaving the center open for a variety of
The origins of the classical style of architecture can be traced back to ancient Greece. While monumental structures did exist before the advent of the temple, much of what is taken from the classical style is derived from the temple. The Greek temple was a fairly standardized building across all of Greece. There were distinct proportions that almost all temples followed as well as certain rules of layout. The main rule that the temples followed was symmetry. This is seen today in buildings that emulate the style. Symmetry in a building provides a sense of strength and stability, which makes sense to have in a temple because it is the house of a god. Similarly, in a capital building which is a representation of the government, it makes sense to have this sense of stability. Later, in Roman Civilization, the temple changed slightly (but remained largely the same), and new building types and techniques arose. The arch was a large
The Façade, designed by the architect Carlo Maderno, “Is 114.69 metres wide and 48 metres high, and has an order of Corinthian columns and pilasters, over which lies an imposing cornice with a central tympanum, crowned by a balustrade with thirteen statues (nearly 6 metres high).” There can be found an inscription on the entablature stating that the Façade was built under Pope Paul V Borghese. In the lower order there are five entrances to the atrium, over which are nine windows, three of which possessing a balcony. The main window, the “Benediction Loggia”, where the Pope gives his blessing upon his election, and at Christmas and Easter. When Maderno added the nave, which is the main body of the church,
Architectural designs changed greatly since the ancient times. Most famous architectures and sculptures today originated from the Greek and Roman civilizations. Moreover, some of the inventions from those civilizations are also being used today, such as the arch, which originated from Roman architecture, and the columns, which originated from the Greek architecture. Throughout history, these architectures and inventions have become the foundations for our buildings, churches, and much more.
Greek-Roman architecture was so tough and perfectionalized in the 480 BC that many buildings around the world have copied there intellectual style. The Romans took to their hands to perfect ionize what the Greeks had started. They mastered constructing all of their buildings with concrete, and kept the essential meaning of the Greek Temples which meant they incorporated their strong symbols for power and dignity. It sure worked since this style has revolutionized the art world. As a matter of fact in 1914 El Paso, Texas build El Paso High school which has been recognized by many and for decades as a magnificent building inspired with this style.
Although the Pantheon and the Cathedral of Chartres are both some of the greatest architectural advances in history they are very different. We can compare the time that each of the buildings was built, where and for who they were built for, and why they were built. Another thing we can compare is the structure of the buildings and the type of material they are built from.
This week, we studied the Parthenon in Athens, Greece and the Pantheon in Rome. In this essay, I will discuss the style and function of each of these buildings. I will consider whether or not each is a typical example of the architecture of their culture. Finally, I will compare and contrast the similarities and differences of these two cities as seen in the architecture of these buildings.
Without the use of concrete the Romans could not have successfully built the barrel vault which holds up the ramping system that are present in the structure. The sanctuary is built into the hillside so that the structure is built into the hill. The building contains seven terraces, 400 feet tall from where the fortune tellers would help pilgrims to colonnaded rotunda on top which contains the 17th century palace of the Barberini. The structure is meant to look out on the plains and mountains, and has a axial