test

1773 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: US policies during the Cold War.

Five years after World War II ended the United States entered the Cold War, an ideological fight between Communism and Democracy. The cause the United States to put in place a Policy of Containment. This policy stated that the United States would keep Communism from spreading. In 1950 Communist North Korea invaded Democratic South Korea with support from the USSR and China. President Truman called for a United Nations Security Council meeting and through discussion the UN deemed it necessary to enter the fight and push the North Koreans back over the 38th Parallel. The United Nations (Which was majorly consisted of Unites States troops) was led by WWII Pacific General, Douglas MacArthur. By 1951 tensions had rose between MacArthur and President Truman. They shared many different opinions on how to fight the Korean War and how to handle their enemies. This tension and disagreement ultimately led to MacArthur being relieved of his duties and having Matthew Ridgeway replace him.
As stated in the book “Reminiscences of General of the Army Douglas MacArthur” on pages 13-14, MacArthur was born on January 26, 1880 in Little Rock, Arkansas. In MacArthur's early life he served in the military during WWI and was General in the Pacific during WWII. According to “The Fall of the Philippines” by the Department of the Army on page 19, Douglas MacArthur was promoted to Commander of the U.S. Army Forces in the Far East on July 26, 1941. MacArthur led American troops to reclaim islands in the Pacific that the Japanese had invaded. Some of these islands included the Philippines and Guadalcanal. In “Volume 2, 1941-1945 The Years of MacArthur” on pages 782-783 it's stated that on August 29, 1945 Douglas MacArthur oversaw the occupation of Japan, he ...

... middle of paper ...

...g this time Truman had fully built up a disliking for MacArthur. Due to MacArthur not showing respect for superiors and insubordination, on April 11, 1951 President Truman relieved MacArthur of his duties and turned them over to Lt. General Matthew Ridgeway. This decision to remove MacArthur did not go well with the public. The United States had a record low approval rate of 23%. Many Americans felt that firing MacArthur was not the correct thing to do. Truman claimed that he relieved MacArthur due to insubordination and disrespect to his superiors and claimed multiple times that he did not regret his decision. The decision to relieve General Douglas MacArthur was subject to mass controversy but ultimately was justified by congress. MacArthur being relieved of his duties altered the first fight of the Cold War which experts say prevented escalation to World War III.

Show More
Related

  • Truman vs. MacArthur

    739 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Korean War changed the face of American Cold War diplomacy forever. In the midst of all the political conflict and speculation worldwide, the nation had to choose between two proposed solutions, each one hoping to ensure that communism didn?t sweep across the globe and destroy American ideals of capitalism and democracy. General Douglas MacArthur takes the pro-active stance and says that, assuming it has the capability, the U.S. should attack communism everywhere. President Harry Truman, on the other hand, believed that containing the Soviet communists from Western Europe was the best and most important course of action, and that eliminating communism in Asia was not a priority.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Jefferson And Harry S. Truman

    1805 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Cold War began and Truman worked to contain communism. The Soviets had put a containment around Berlin and therefore the American’s could not get in supplies to the democratic people there. Truman then got the daring idea to do an airlift to get supplies to the people there and it was highly successful. This was a brave action because of a few reasons. The nation was scared of another world war with the Soviet Union and Truman had the lowest approval ratings he had ever had. This action had a chance of causing retaliation from the Soviet Union and was therefore highly risky. He also had reelection coming up which required the public’s approval and this action could risk getting that approval. While this showed bravery for the previously stated reasons it also showed his compassion for people. He made sure these people were taken care of with very few excuses. This event also led to an expansion in the defense department in the United States. This growth of the defense department continued for several years and continued to provide some protection throughout the Cold War. While it can be difficult to see exactly how this effected the rest of the Cold War but it can be argued that it definitely helped the side of democracy in the world. Both bravery and compassion are great traits for a successful President, so it is no surprise that he was so

    Read More

  • Bases Of Power

    599 Words  | 2 Pages

    His coercive and informational power, however, were not as effective. His coercive power and defensive approach made it challenging to connect with his civilian leadership, which caused many disagreements between the two. His informational power was the deciding factor for President Truman to relieve General MacArthur for insubordination. President Truman’s legitimate power and referent power were effective in that his subordinates respected him, and most of the time supported his decisions. He coercive power was effective in the end when he relieved General

    Read More

  • America's Reluctant Entry into World War II

    2065 Words  | 5 Pages

    It is clear that the two generals did not care for each other before World War II even started, as they “rubbed each other the wrong way” when they first met while stationed at Fort Leavenworth together from 1908-1911. When Marshall became MacArthur’s superior, MacArthur would say, “My worst enemy has always been behind me.” The two had their quarrels from the time they met up until the end of World War I, which had been evident for many spectators to witness. However, both MacArthur and Marshall were able to put their hostility towards each other aside when they had to focus on the task at hand in order to help the American military progress. There were times in which General Marshall would encourage and support the decisions MacArthur made, and there were times in which Marshall would not support the actions of MacArthur during the course of World War II. The support for MacArthur endured during the first half of America’s participation in World War II, whereas Marshall’s support and encouragement had become minimal towards the end when MacArthur’s “egotistic” attitude had taken the best of

    Read More

  • U.S. Generals of World War Two

    2917 Words  | 6 Pages

    General George C. Marshall was Army Chief of Staff during World War II. General Marshall planned some important strategies against the Japanese. He was born on December 31, 1880, in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, and was educated at Virginia Military Institute. He was commissioned a second lieutenant in the infantry in 1901 and served in the Philippine Islands from 1902 to 1903. During World War I he served as chief of operations with the U.S. First Army in France. He became a colonel in 1918 and received wide military recognition for his handling of troops and equipment during the Saint Mihiel and Meuse-Argonne operations. From 1919 to 1924 he was aide to the U.S. commander in chief, General John Pershing, and during the next three years he saw service in China. Marshall taught in various army schools and organizations from 1927 to 1936, when he was promoted to the rank of brigadier general.

    Read More

  • General Douglas Macarthur's Farewell Address to Congress

    1860 Words  | 4 Pages

    Early in his career, Douglas Macarthur was sent to the Philippines and Panama, and was promoted to the position of first lieutenant. In 1906, he joined his father and served under President Theodore Roosevelt. Later, he joined the mission of US occupation of Veracruz, Mexico. In World War 1, he prevailed as the commander of 42nd Division and by the end of the war, he was promoted to brigadier general. From 1919 to 1922, he became the youngest superintendent for West Point Military Aca...

    Read More

  • Tojo Hideki Essay

    1155 Words  | 3 Pages

    His remarkable abilities as a staff officer led to quick promotion. After serving as chief of police affairs of the Kwantung army (the Japanese army in China), he became its chief of staff in 1937. He was appointed vice minister of war in May 1938 and director of military aviation in December. In July 1940, as minister of war, he drafted new mobilization plans that strained diplomatic relations with the United States.

    Read More

  • America’s Response to Pearl Harbor

    2302 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Pacific war started with striking Japanese victories. The Japanese arrived in Manila by January 1942. The American forces held out up to early May, after ...

    Read More

  • Korea: MacArthurs war with Truman

    817 Words  | 2 Pages

    MacArthur, though in many ways was a failed general in that he lost many troops and strategic strong holds, was still a very popular “hero” from WW II. Although it depends on who you talk to. My great-grand father was U.S.S. Colorado and everyone in the Pacific during the was thought MacArthur was a horrible leader, and commander. MacArthur tended to make his own choices on U.S. foreign policy. MacArthur wanted to take troops all the way up to the Yule River on the border of Korea and China. Truman hated MacArthur for this, absolutely hated him. Truman felt that MacArthur’s daring had unduly escalated the war. China was now involved, and Truman feared Russia was to follow. Even though at that time Russia was considered a friend, Truman knew it was only one major conflict away from another world war. MacArthur wanted to bring in Chinese nationalist from Thailand into the war and attack Mainland China. MacArthur even went as far as to fly to Thailand and meet with nationalist leaders to discuss doing so. MacArthur even suggested using up to 20 atomic bombs on strategic Chinese locations. He did not want his soldiers to die for a stalemate, he wanted total victory.

    Read More

  • Embracing Defeat by John Dower

    3331 Words  | 7 Pages

    General Douglas MacArthur, the Supreme Commander of the Allied Power (otherwise known as SCAP), from day one became, except in name, dictator of Japan. No aspect of the Japanese nation was untouched, with special attention directed to the areas military, government, and the economy. While most revolutions throughout history have emanated from below, starting from the people, the social and political changes forthcoming was truly a "revolution from above." Within a month of landing numerous measures were enacted, either to dissolve e...

    Read More

  • The Effects Of The Korean Armistice Agreement

    959 Words  | 2 Pages

    During 1950 there was much opposition to the thought of ending the Korean War. While the United States of America and the United Nations Command sought out to peacefully end the war, both North Korea and South Korea were hell-bent towards unifying the Korean peninsula in their own image. While at this time South Korea, was an ally of

    Read More

  • Douglas Macarthur And The Korean War Essay

    1815 Words  | 4 Pages

    June 27th, 1950 was the day the United States announced its direct assistance in the Korean War. The following day United States planes were already bombing the North Korean Army and the United States is getting prepared for more attacks. On July 7th, 1950 General Douglas MacArthur was appointed to be commander of all UN forces which was an easy choice for President Truman to make because he and MacArthur were great friends and Truman admired MacArthur for his great military leadership. After being appointed MacArthur said to Truman "I can only repeat the pledge of my complete personal loyalty to you as well as an absolute devotion to your monumental struggle for peace and good will throughout the world. I hope I will not fail you"(MacArthur). When MacArthur took command in Korea he provided the soldiers with a much needed moral boost that kept them fighting harder and gave them a new sense of hope. During the begin...

    Read More

  • United States Involvement in the Korean War

    955 Words  | 2 Pages

    U.S. participation was centered on America’s foreign policy at the time. Although the War did not break out until June of 1950, several conflicts brewed over the attempt to take over the entire nation under one rule for several years after World War II. The majority of these conflicts took place at the 38th parallel where Korea was split. Decisions influenced by President Harry S. Truman and his doctrine, which was essentially the policy to contain the spread of communism, gave the United Nations an opportunity to prevent global domination through communism (“Teaching with Documents”). The fear of international communism from the powers of the Soviet Union and the People’s Republic of China was the main reason that caused the United States to intervene.

    Read More

  • Test

    675 Words  | 2 Pages

    Making a good and persuasive argument is very much an acquired skill. It requires much practice and perfecting. It takes more than just having passion and making good points. Just because a person is passionate about the topic or has supporting details does not mean they can make a successful argument. Much more thought and skill is required. Gordon Adams, in his letter to the Arizona State University standards committee, demonstrates this quite well. Gordon Adams writes a passionate argument, yet his argument lacks several critical aspects.

    Read More

  • Tora Compare And Contrast Essay

    2275 Words  | 5 Pages

    The events for the Japanese side begin on December 12, 1932 when Isoroku Yamamoto was appointed Director of the Aeronautical Department of the Navy Ministry. He inspired reliance and assurance with the opportunity to make the air fleet a resourceful part for the Navy. He established a long needed driving force toward the future. It was Yamamoto's temperament that also had to do with his strategy and lead on his next groundwork. Yamamoto's assessment of the war with the United States came from his extensive research he did while attending Harvard University and his service as naval ambassador in Washington. He became familiar with the United States strengths and weaknesses. It was August, 1939 that Yamamoto was appointed Commander in Chief due to his knowledge base of the United States and his Naval command that earned him this position. Yamamoto determined that if Japan was to have the lead in the war, they would have to destroy the US Pacific Fleet in a long range, preventive attack using aircra...

    Read More

More about test

Open Document