socrates

832 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Trial of Socrates arguing his innocence

This paper will argue that during “The trial and Death of Socrates”, Socrates could have given better arguments for his defense. First it will outline the prejudices or accusations Socrates has to face during his trial. It will then show how Socrates acted as tough he wanted to lose the case and finally it will conclude explaining the arguments Socrates could have given in order to be acquitted.

During the first speech (18a-19b) Socrates has to overcome two different types of prejudices: the old prejudice against Socrates set by the plays of Aristophanes and the new prejudices that included impiety charged by Meletus as well as the corruption of the youth.
In fact more than once is Socrates confused for someone else. Aristophanes is responsible for latter but it is reconstructed by Meletus as including both impiety and corruption and Socrates is portrayed as a corrupt teacher .the first charge of impiety also originates with Aristophanes but Meletus confuses Socrates with the atheistic Anaxagoras when he describes Socrates as seeking to study the heavens (18a) the second charge of corruption is also in Aristophanes' Clouds but confuses Socrates with Protagoras. This led to confusion (18e) of Socrates with other sophists like Gorgias, Prodicus, and Hippias.
The new prejudice against Socrates really is because of the Socratic paradox (20c-21a): “he knows nothing and only in this he claims to be wise “ this paradox aroused hatred against him (21b, 23ab), even though he explains that the knowledge of his ignorance lead to his philosophical mission in life .his mission to question and to seek “the unexamined life is no life for a man”(21c-23c) this is explained by Chaerephon's enquiry at Apollo's oracle at Delphi declaring Socrates the wisest of men (21b-) Socrates turns this philosophical interrogation into his philosophical purpose ,as a consequence the young followed him trying to copy his questions to their leaders (23c) this arose the charge of corrupting the youth ( 23d) since like Socrates, they also questioned the leaders of democracy and religion, claiming not to believe in the gods and discover the heavens (d) .
Having in mind all theses accusations Socrates, should had defend himself better but that was not the case. Throughout the trial, he acted as though he wanted to lose the case. He went out of his way to antagonize the jury, making comments that associated himself with certain people and ideas that were offensive to the jury.

Show More
Related

  • The Apology and Crito

    345 Words  | 1 Pages

    Plato’s "Apology" gives the substance of the defense made by Socrates to the Athenians at his trial. Meletus, Anytus and Lyncon brought Socrates to court on charges of corrupting the morals of the youth, leading the youth away from the principals of democracy, neglecting the Gods of the State and introducing new divinities.

    Read More

  • The Death Penalty In Plato's Euthyphro And Socrates

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    The first sets of charges against Socrates are from Plato 19a-24a where the early accusers accused Socrates of being a physicalist and sophist. These charges in truth were false and were not placed against him. The next sets of charges against Socrates were specific charges found in Plato 24b-28a. These charges were made by Meletus, Anytus, and Lycon. The accused charges Socrates was acquitted guilty for were corruption of the youth, and impiety. For these charges Meletus demanded death penalty which Socrates received at the end of the trial. Socrates was guilty for corrupting the youth not in a bad way but a good way. He corrupted the youth by educated them and trying to keep them out of trouble and the bad of the community. Yet on the other hand Socrates was not guilty for being impiety. Socrates says “ I do not have the leisure to engage in public affairs to any extent, not indeed to look after my own, but I like in great poverty because my service to the gods” (23b). Therefore making Socrates not guilty of being

    Read More

  • Examples Of Heroism In Andrew Carnegie

    788 Words  | 2 Pages

    In document D it is shown that Carnegie mistreated the Americans that worked for him. Carnegie lowered wages for his workers and then proceeded to give away money to the Scottish. This is evidence for the counter argument that Andrew Carnegie is not a hero. All in all, Carnegie does the most to make up for these mistakes. He donates all his wealth to many charities and foundations in the United States. He may have hurt his workers but he made up for it by giving all he had to better the lives of the poor in America. Thus Andrew Carnegie is a hero. A man who helped illions with his donations to America and

    Read More

  • Plato's account of Socrates Apology

    1700 Words  | 4 Pages

    Socrates enters into his trial acknowledging the fact that he is going up against a jury of men, many of whom already have a biased, negative view towards him. He explains that many of them, though not knowing him personally, feel as though they do based solely on word of mouth, weakening the validity of the trial against him. As Socrates states in the account of his defence;

    Read More

  • Socrates, Guilty Or Not

    931 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Apology, Socrates examines the charges brought against him by Meletus and tries to prove that they are false. The first charge brought against him is that he was corrupting the youth. Socrates responds to this by asking Meletus in his opinion, how Socrates was corrupting the youth. Meletus says that Socrates was teaching the youth to go against the government. Socrates asks if there was anyone who was beneficial for the youth. Meletus says that the council, jury, assembly, even the general public was beneficial to the youth and that Socrates was the only person corrupting them. Socrates claims that it was impossible for the one person to be capable of corrupting the youth when they had so many to show them in the right direction.

    Read More

  • Andrew Carnegie

    366 Words  | 1 Pages

    Andrew Carnegie life was a true rags to riches story. He started out as a poor Scottish immigrant whose first job paid $1.20 per week. He worked his way up to being a multimillionaire while he was still in his thirties. Carnegie is not just known for making money, but he mainly known for giving his fortune.

    Read More

  • Socrates Modest Revision of the Status Quo

    739 Words  | 2 Pages

    “I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only make them think.” These words were spoken by a very famed philosopher, who in his apology, or defense, claimed his innocence in many charges, including the corruption of youth. Of course, in his era, society was spilt between recognizing him with fame or infamy. This is noticed in two of the most insightful plays of Socrates’ life: Aristophanes’ Clouds and Plato’s Apology. Clouds introduces Socrates charges with Apology concluding his trial. Despite a compelling account placing guilt on Socrates by Aristophanes’ Clouds, my belief sits along with Plato’s Apology’s more logical implication in the innocence of Socrates, who offered an alteration to the connection of thought and speech to the youth of his age rather than the accused corruption.

    Read More

  • Socrates Was NOT Guilty

    1660 Words  | 4 Pages

    Socrates, in his conviction from the Athenian jury, was both innocent and guilty as charged. In Plato’s Five Dialogues, accounts of events ranging from just prior to Socrates’ entry into the courthouse up until his mouthful of hemlock, both points are represented. Socrates’ in dealing with moral law was not guilty of the crimes he was accused of by Meletus. Socrates was only guilty as charged because his peers had concluded him as such. The laws didn’t find Socrates guilty; Socrates was guilty because his jurors enforced the laws. The law couldn’t enforce itself. Socrates was accused of corrupting Athens’ youth, not believing in the gods of the city and creating his own gods. In the Euthyphro, Socrates defends himself against the blasphemous charges outside the courthouse to a priest Euthyphro. Socrates looks to the priest to tell him what exactly is pious so that he may educate himself as to why he would be perceived as impious. Found in the Apology, another of Plato’s Five Dialogues, Socrates aims to defend his principles to the five hundred and one person jury. Finally, the Crito, an account of Socrates’ final discussion with his good friend Crito, Socrates is offered an opportunity to escape the prison and his death sentence. As is known, Socrates rejected the suggestion. It is in the Euthyphro and the Apology that it can be deduced that Socrates is not guilty as charged, he had done nothing wrong and he properly defended himself. However, in the Crito, it is shown that Socrates is guilty only in the interpretation and enforcement of Athens’ laws through the court system and its jurors. Socrates’ accusations of being blasphemous are also seen as being treasonous.

    Read More

  • Andrew Carnegie

    1162 Words  | 3 Pages

    A man of Scotland, a distinguished citizen of the United States, and a philanthropist devoted to the betterment of the world around him, Andrew Carnegie became famous at the turn of the twentieth century and became a real life rags to riches story.

    Read More

  • The View Of A Political Community

    1748 Words  | 4 Pages

    Socrates the main character and figure of the texts sought what is and not what should be. As Professor Dungey, of California State University, Northridge stated to reiterate, he ran around in Athens questioning life and if the political matters that the city was engulfed in were correctly approached by those that ruled the polis. The perpetuation of his questioning led to a certain stigmatized view of Socrates. Aristophanes’ Clouds prove to be a factor that led to the demise of Socrates and altered the general populace’s view of him and philosophy. Moreover, Aristophanes presented three main premises in his play to portray Socrates and what he defen...

    Read More

  • Socrates Views Of Death In Plato's The Apology

    498 Words  | 1 Pages

    Rather, Socrates would have indeed preferred to continue his teachings peacefully without any criminal charges, but presented with this occasion, he implements his teaching fully and impressively for all to see. Then, to complete my understanding, I concluded, he would be allowing himself to have an “unexamined life [that] is not worth living” (West, p. 38a) if he testified in his defense with anything but the truth and reason. In the end, Socrates, I believe, never attempted to shield his beliefs to die a hero or to ignite his teaching with the rage that would be his death, but simply, his teachings beautifully left him no other clear choice than to continue his philosophical pursuit of outrunning wickedness by examining himself and others with nothing but reason even in the face of

    Read More

  • A Just Man Should Fear No Death in the Apology by Plato

    841 Words  | 2 Pages

    Socrates defends himself against the charges brought against him by his prosecutor Meletus in two ways. One way consists of a description of Socrates’ motivation and method, which he hopes will explain to the jury why some people, including his prosecutors, dislike him. The second defense consists of Socrates responding directly to the two charges brought against him: “corrupting the young” and impiety, or more specifically, “not believing in the gods in whom the city believes” (p. 28). I’ll address these two lines of defense in turn.

    Read More

  • Socrates Moral Matters

    1748 Words  | 4 Pages

    Socrates chose at this hearing to speak in his own philosophical style and at times he appeared not to be either aware of the penalty that could be imposed on him or apathetic. To Socrates his teachings on what it meant to be virtuous, a good citizen, and someone who lived a good life at times seemed to be more important. This was also noted in the book “Plato:The Last Days of Socrates” in a preface to Plato’s work Apology, in which the author noted how “The curious thing about the Apology is given over to Socrates’ attempts to dispel the long term prejudice against him, while the tactics adopted were most likely to increase the prejudice.” It would seem that Socrates had been more interested in protecting his legacy than actually attempting to provide proof of innocence to the court. It has been speculated that Socrates at the time either did not know of the sentence that they would carry out against him or that the courts would give him another option for punishment. Once Socrates was found guilty he was in the position of having to choose a punishment as an alternative to the death penalty for the crimes he was alleged to have committed. At this time he also voiced surprise by the narrow margin of the votes cast against him.

    Read More

  • Deciphering Socrates: A Journey through Plato's Works

    1279 Words  | 3 Pages

    Usually people think Socrates is innocent based on the fact that they believe his accusations are not necessarily bad. Although I also believe that they aren’t bad, I have based my conclusion of Socrates’ innocence only on his actions in “The Republic of Plato”.

    Read More

  • The Unexamined Life Is Not Worth Living

    1037 Words  | 3 Pages

    When Socrates was brought to trial for the corruption of the city’s youth he knew he had done nothing wrong. He had lived his life as it should be lead, and did what he ne...

    Read More

More about socrates

Open Document