Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Electoral college reform us essay
Why the electoral college should be revised
The electoral college then and now
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Electoral college reform us essay
Ever since its conception, the Electoral College has been the subject of much debate. Its ability to sway elections out of the hands of the people has always been a subject of controversy. When it was created, the whole point was that it would prevent the people from picking only the most popular candidate and make sure the president would be a person who actually fulfilled the qualifications of the office. Since then, it has been the focus of much debate as to whether or not it actually fulfills its intended purpose. Representative William Delahunt and Senator Richard Durbin are of the mindset that the Electoral College is no longer doing its job well enough to justify its usefulness, and as such, should be abolished. In support of the Electoral College are House resolutions adopted by the Virginia Legislature. These are laid before the senate in an attempt to convince the body that the Electoral College is still able to correctly perform its intended purpose, and, perhaps more importantly, its job is still required.
Delahunt brings legislation in favor of abolishing the Electoral College before the House of Representatives on the heels of the 2001 election, which President Bush won after losing the popular vote, but the Electoral College chose him to ascend to the office of president over his competitor. He starts off by making clear two things, first: that he wishes the President the best of luck regardless of the fact that he is of a different party, and second: that he in no way doubts the legality of the election and the way it took place. He takes issue with how one body can effectively render null the votes of 500,000 American citizens. He brings up how poorly the Electoral College is arranged. In...
... middle of paper ...
...d that the preservation of such a historically tested system as the Electoral College is within the best interests of the America and her citizens.
The Electoral College has and always will be a cause for great amounts of controversy during our election process. There are many in opposition to, and many in favor of, this system that has withstood the test of time for 200 years. Like it or not, the Electoral College represents the will of the founders of our nation and shows their opinion on how they felt our government should operate. Even if the Electoral College should one day be abolished, it has left a significant impact upon our history as a nation, not only because of its ability to swing the elections to one side or the other when it is least expected, but also because of the sense of unity and oneness that such a system inevitably creates.
The Electoral College vs. Popular Vote The United States is a privileged country with freedoms and opportunities many countries strive to achieve. People come into the United States in hopes of obtaining these rights and a better life for themselves; they strive to achieve “The American Dream.” Citizens are given the chance to vote, speak their mind, and live according to their desires without prejudice. However, the same government that promises hope has flaws that frustrate the American people: the Electoral College is one topic of debate. Many feel this system is a safe way to regulate who leads the country, while others feel that issues should be left to popular vote.
It is clear that Hamilton felt it was necessary for the intellect of the people would become of great significance in choosing a person to whom much trust is being invested as the President of the United States. Furthermore, the writer also wanted to make sure the person chosen as the President of the United States would be well protected during his time in office. Too, Hamilton mentions more important ways to avoid tumult to make sure the process of electing the President was planned thoroughly. Alexander Hamilton points out that it should be several electors from each state in the voting process, although the final vote
Electoral College is Wrong The Electoral College is the name given to a group of electors who are nominated by political activists and party members within the states. The electoral college really isn't necessary and should be abolished. There are numerous reasons why this is so important. With the Electoral College in effect, third parties don't have a chance to become the president, which isn't fair.
The Electoral College has been the favored method by the United States to elect the president for many years. When the College was first created in 1787 it was seen as an efficient and reliable way to vote the president into office. It has been more than 2 centuries since this method of electing was chosen and many things have changed in U.S. society. The Electoral College is failing to keep up with these advancements in society and a new method must be chosen soon.
Due to the discrepancy between the winner of the popular vote and the winner of the electoral college in the most recent election, there has been a lot of talk about eliminating the electoral college and moving to a direct popular vote. While many people argue for this shift, usually with little knowledge of what a popular vote election would look like, there are also many citizens who are opposed to the idea. In our polarized political climate, this fact is not surprising. Those who support the electoral college defend it by claiming that it is not only constitutional, but it also represents the whole county, and makes for a more certain, legitimate election process.
The Electoral College was created by the framers at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. They believe that it wasn’t a good idea for the people to elect the president directly because they did not trust that voters would have enough information to make a good choice. The Electoral College basically chooses who the next president will be since it takes away our freedom to vote. The Electoral College should be abolished because it’s undemocratic, the small states are overrepresented, and it hurts third parties. The United States of America is a democratic country that is characterized by the equality of rights and privileges.
Understanding these conceivable implications, the Framers sought to minimize the risk that a tyrannical leader rise to power in such a fashion. In spite of this potential danger, the Framers originally intended to give the masses the ability to select those electors who would make the cast the final vote to elect the president. Through this compromise the framers hoped to maintain the most important essence of a democratic society while simultaneously protecting the young nation from the unreliable nature of mob thinking. (Dahl, 75-77) By selecting individuals who were wise, not subject to political vices and incorruptible the Framers hoped to ensure that presidential elections were fair and provided the nation with the best possible chance of electing exceptional
Voting is at the center of every democratic system. In america, it is the system in which a president is elected into office, and people express their opinion. Many people walk into the voting booth with the thought that every vote counts, and that their vote might be the one that matters above all else. But in reality, America’s voting system is old and flawed in many ways. Electoral College is a commonly used term on the topic of elections but few people actually know how it works.
In conclusion, the Electoral College should be abolished because small states are unrepresented, there are many flaws in the system, and it is not accurate based on people 's votes. Overall there seems to be no need for it, it was made for the reason that back then they thought it was a simple way of choosing a president, but really it just causes problems and does not represent the candidates or voters fairly. If America is truly about equality and democracy, then they will abolish the Electoral College and let the people have a
The Electoral College today is a very complex system of voting and campaigning. When it was first created, the Framers thought the average citizen of their day was not intelligent enough to know who should be leading their country. So they created the Electoral College which was run by people who knew what they were doing. The Electoral College is a body of people who represent each state and they determine the president. The real question is: Has the Electoral College gotten too far out of hand where it needs to go? The answer is yes. The reasons are because any third party candidate running in the election has no chance of winning any electoral votes. Also, it gives too much power to the big states in electoral votes. Finally, it creates problems on majority electoral votes and equality of smaller states is diminished.
The Electoral College was a compromise between those at the Constitutional Convention who wanted the US president elected by popular vote and those who wanted congress to select the president. They believed that having it where each state would get a certain number of votes based on population would keep a manipulative and charming person out of office. They thought it would prevent bribery and corruption along with secret dealings. I don’t think that this is the case and it one of the reason I feel that the Electoral College should be abolished.
The Electoral College should be abolished because the United States today is much more populous and very different than when the founders wrote the Constitution more than two centuries ago (Raasch 1)...
The political culture that defines American politics shows that despite this compromise, America is still very much a democratic society. The very history of the country, a major contributor to the evolution of its political culture, shows a legacy of democracy that reaches from the Declaration of Independence through over two hundred years to today’s society. The formation of the country as a reaction to the tyrannical rule of a monarchy marks the first unique feature of America’s democratic political culture. It was this reactionary mindset that greatly affected many of the decisions over how to set up the new governmental system. A fear of simply creating a new, but just as tyrannic... ...
If the Electoral College stays, then the people will not be able to choose the right person for the right job. So this shows how it can cause so many people to be frustrated with the Electoral College, which does not really help the country at all, in terms of the choosing a new President.
As the United States of America gets older, so does the presidential election voting system. The argument to change this method of voting has been becoming more and more popular as the years go on. It has been said that the Framers of the Constitution came up with this method because of the bad transportation, communication, and they feared the public’s intelligence was not suitable for choosing the President of the United States. Others say that the Framers made this method because they feared that the public did not receive sufficient information about candidates outside of their state to make such a decision based on direct popular vote. My research on this controversial issue of politics will look into the factors into why the Electoral College exists and if it is possibly outdated for today’s society. It will look into the pros and cons of this voting system, and it will explore the alternative methods of voting such as the Direct Popular vote. Many scholarly authors have gathered research to prove that this voting system is outdated and it does not accurately represent the national popular will. Many U.S. citizens value their vote because they only get one to cast towards the candidate of their choice in the presidential election. Based on the Electoral College system their vote may possibly not be represented. Because of today’s society in the U.S. the Electoral College should be abolished because it is not necessary to use a middle-man to choose our president for us. It is a vote by the people, all of us having one voice, one vote.